Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSince the historians came out a couple of
Weeks ago with the rankings of all the presidents, my dear friend suggested instead of calling him 45, why don't we start being more accurate and call him 45th?
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since the historians came out a couple of (Original Post)
JMCKUSICK
Mar 2024
OP
marble falls
(71,394 posts)1. He makes me want to drink 4 5ths
Jerry2144
(3,210 posts)2. Because he will become
46th, then 47th, then 48th etc. He will continue to drop in the rankings for hopefully the next hundred years.
Just call him the nations worst president. Then no need to update the ranking
czarjak
(13,512 posts)3. Last be best.
kimbutgar
(26,979 posts)4. If he is defeated in November history will not be kind or forgiving to him
Which Im ok with!
