General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatching the coverage of the Supreme Court's decision on the abortion pill.......
and I still just can not believe we are here as a country .how the hell did this happen. I know Roe vs Wade started it all, but damn, I just cant even believe its been two years since that gawd damn verdict. I just cant believe were here supposedly one of the best and modern and leaders in the world potentially banning an abortion pill. 🤬 🤬 🤬
jmbar2
(7,827 posts)Is the woman speaking to the court Ms. Hawley?
a kennedy
(35,643 posts)jmbar2
(7,827 posts)a kennedy
(35,643 posts)Hope22
(4,588 posts)Was it million or dozens effected here! Hmmmmm ..
spanone
(141,255 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,358 posts)The SC has upended the notion of redress for actual harm suffered by a plaintiff and instead now considers cases where no actual harm exists, cases especially manufactured to get to the SC on appeal to push a religious agenda that this court is all too eager to alliw.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)basing THEIR arguments are based entirely on hypotheticals.
They are overstepping their authority
Who do these draconian judges think they are
MOMFUDSKI
(7,080 posts)A yes verdict can affect every drug out there. But not Viagra. No, not Viagra.
3Hotdogs
(15,184 posts)The only way to overturn it, if that is what happens, is to hear the case. If they did not, the r/w judge's decision would remain law.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)In every single election. They will be sorry.
a kennedy
(35,643 posts)wryter2000
(47,940 posts)If they have to worry about Alabama, they are in a whole heap of trouble.
Hope22
(4,588 posts)And not cry for every woman who has needed or may need this treatment. Why the hell males have the right to preside over an issue that does not affect them is beyond my understanding. At no point do they consider the danger pregnancy presents.
jmbar2
(7,827 posts)If the drug "injures" doctors in hospitals forced to treat adverse events, could that also be used with gun shot injuries?
And if they can refuse to help, based on moral objections, would that also not apply to gunshots?
Opens a can of worms!
Sympthsical
(10,909 posts)Outside of Thomas, of course.
Was listening in the shower, and kept rolling my eyes. A lot of the topics they're discussing aren't something judges are equipped to make decisions about. Coney Barrett got into FDA approval processes and it sounded like she googled half an article right before the hearing.
I really do enjoy Justice Jackson. No matter what's going on, she punches right to the point. It felt like she was thisclose to saying, "You know this is all bullshit" when she was discussing the retracted studies.
lindysalsagal
(22,851 posts)if the drug fails.
BooHoo. So get the hell out of medicine and work at burger king.
mzmolly
(52,734 posts)the SCOTUS. Susan Sarandon said the same. .... Here we are.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)mzmolly
(52,734 posts)And the same will complain that Democrats should 'fight harder' while taking our power to do so.
lindysalsagal
(22,851 posts)Whew!
The forced-birth doc who might not like abortion doesn't balance with the de-stabilizing effect internationally. She got the final word and it was clear and solid and forceful.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)I am not confident about this at all
The courts have no business in the approval of drugs over the FDA
lindysalsagal
(22,851 posts)They never even got past the question of standing, and never discussed the function of FDA approvals.
LeftInTX
(34,031 posts)I guess another case will come along.
However, surprised there wasn't over reach, but pretty sure Roberts and another one would have tossed the case if standing was an issue. I'm sure Alito and Thomas wouldn't give a s_____
underpants
(195,721 posts)and we know how that went.
Takket
(23,579 posts)rubbersole
(11,131 posts)The 30+ year effort is paying off. Just getting started in their minds. Voters will stop this. Decades of work/vigilance ahead.
MustLoveBeagles
(15,398 posts)Bev54
(13,356 posts)KS Toronado
(23,478 posts)Keep the population as high as possible so there's more people than jobs keeping wages low, thus their
overhead. 
Bluethroughu
(7,215 posts)We need to have a massive Democratic Tsunami to add more Justices to the Supreme Court with term limits and criminal liability for bribery, overturn Citizens United, pass one vote right of all American citizens, and dump the electoral college.
Now, let's get it done at home and the Federal level.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Goddamit
On edit:
Sorry I yelled. Suddenly I miss my friend Leona so much. All during the Trump years (and beyond) shed periodically phone me to fume: Do you know what they just did?! and then we could have a good mutual rant for an hour. She died one year ago, and damn, I could use one of those phone calls right now.