Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

a kennedy

(35,643 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:38 AM Mar 2024

Watching the coverage of the Supreme Court's decision on the abortion pill.......

and I still just can not believe we are here as a country…….how the hell did this happen. I know Roe vs Wade started it all, but damn, I just can’t even believe it’s been two years since that gawd damn verdict. I just can’t believe we’re here supposedly one of the best and modern and leaders in the world potentially banning an abortion pill. 🤬 🤬 🤬

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watching the coverage of the Supreme Court's decision on the abortion pill....... (Original Post) a kennedy Mar 2024 OP
Just tuned in... jmbar2 Mar 2024 #1
No.....Elizabeth Prelogar. a kennedy Mar 2024 #3
Thanks - fast talker! jmbar2 Mar 2024 #5
Erin Hawley is talking now..... a kennedy Mar 2024 #9
She had a stumble there. Hope22 Mar 2024 #13
Dobbs was just the beginning.... spanone Mar 2024 #2
That this is before the SC is a travesty. JohnSJ Mar 2024 #4
Another travesty is that this court accepts cases based not n the precedent of actual harm but on made-up harm. Lonestarblue Mar 2024 #6
They want to take away the authority of the FDA. The extremists judges are JohnSJ Mar 2024 #7
You can bet the FDA is beyond pissed! MOMFUDSKI Mar 2024 #18
They had to accept the case. The ban was already decided by the judge in Texas. The ban is/was law. 3Hotdogs Mar 2024 #30
We will punish them. wryter2000 Mar 2024 #8
I so hope you are right....... a kennedy Mar 2024 #10
I understand a Democrat won an election Alabama yesterday wryter2000 Mar 2024 #33
It's hard to watch this Hope22 Mar 2024 #11
Interesting arguments by Ms. Hawley jmbar2 Mar 2024 #12
The justices don't seem to be biting Sympthsical Mar 2024 #14
The forced-birth lawyer is panicking . The argument is a Dr. might object to doing the procedure lindysalsagal Mar 2024 #15
Well, Ralph Nader said it did not matter who nominated mzmolly Mar 2024 #16
Cornell west, David Sirota, Nina Turner, and other dumb asses JohnSJ Mar 2024 #19
Yes, it's quite a long list of fools. mzmolly Mar 2024 #23
US solicitor general Prelogar just eviscerated the forced-birth eejeeit. lindysalsagal Mar 2024 #17
Yes, but the way the conservative justices are presenting their hypothetical questions, JohnSJ Mar 2024 #22
MSNBC pundits agree: The suit was a flop: No standing. lindysalsagal Mar 2024 #20
Just read an AP article. Standing is an issue. LeftInTX Mar 2024 #26
Well there was no standing in the Student Loan case underpants Mar 2024 #29
How did we get here: "but her emails". That phrase led directly to all of this. Takket Mar 2024 #21
The oligarch funded Federalist Society is the root of the illegitimate contemporary SC. rubbersole Mar 2024 #24
This MustLoveBeagles Mar 2024 #25
The RW Judge shopping has also brought this upon the country and Mitch McConnell says they should continue. Bev54 Mar 2024 #27
Sometimes I think repugs do shit like this for one reason KS Toronado Mar 2024 #28
They are coming after women's right to vote next. Bluethroughu Mar 2024 #31
THEY LITERALLY BROUGHT UP THE COMSTOCK ACT. ETA sorry for yelling... Hekate Mar 2024 #32

Lonestarblue

(13,358 posts)
6. Another travesty is that this court accepts cases based not n the precedent of actual harm but on made-up harm.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:46 AM
Mar 2024

The SC has upended the notion of redress for actual harm suffered by a plaintiff and instead now considers cases where no actual harm exists, cases especially manufactured to get to the SC on appeal to push a religious agenda that this court is all too eager to alliw.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
7. They want to take away the authority of the FDA. The extremists judges are
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:52 AM
Mar 2024

basing THEIR arguments are based entirely on hypotheticals.

They are overstepping their authority

Who do these draconian judges think they are

 

MOMFUDSKI

(7,080 posts)
18. You can bet the FDA is beyond pissed!
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:43 AM
Mar 2024

A yes verdict can affect every drug out there. But not Viagra. No, not Viagra.

3Hotdogs

(15,184 posts)
30. They had to accept the case. The ban was already decided by the judge in Texas. The ban is/was law.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 12:04 PM
Mar 2024

The only way to overturn it, if that is what happens, is to hear the case. If they did not, the r/w judge's decision would remain law.

wryter2000

(47,940 posts)
33. I understand a Democrat won an election Alabama yesterday
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:27 AM
Mar 2024

If they have to worry about Alabama, they are in a whole heap of trouble.

Hope22

(4,588 posts)
11. It's hard to watch this
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:00 AM
Mar 2024

And not cry for every woman who has needed or may need this treatment. Why the hell males have the right to preside over an issue that does not affect them is beyond my understanding. At no point do they consider the danger pregnancy presents.

jmbar2

(7,827 posts)
12. Interesting arguments by Ms. Hawley
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:02 AM
Mar 2024

If the drug "injures" doctors in hospitals forced to treat adverse events, could that also be used with gun shot injuries?

And if they can refuse to help, based on moral objections, would that also not apply to gunshots?

Opens a can of worms!

Sympthsical

(10,909 posts)
14. The justices don't seem to be biting
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:17 AM
Mar 2024

Outside of Thomas, of course.

Was listening in the shower, and kept rolling my eyes. A lot of the topics they're discussing aren't something judges are equipped to make decisions about. Coney Barrett got into FDA approval processes and it sounded like she googled half an article right before the hearing.

I really do enjoy Justice Jackson. No matter what's going on, she punches right to the point. It felt like she was thisclose to saying, "You know this is all bullshit" when she was discussing the retracted studies.

lindysalsagal

(22,851 posts)
15. The forced-birth lawyer is panicking . The argument is a Dr. might object to doing the procedure
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:23 AM
Mar 2024

if the drug fails.

BooHoo. So get the hell out of medicine and work at burger king.

mzmolly

(52,734 posts)
16. Well, Ralph Nader said it did not matter who nominated
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:39 AM
Mar 2024

the SCOTUS. Susan Sarandon said the same. .... Here we are.

mzmolly

(52,734 posts)
23. Yes, it's quite a long list of fools.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:56 AM
Mar 2024

And the same will complain that Democrats should 'fight harder' while taking our power to do so.

lindysalsagal

(22,851 posts)
17. US solicitor general Prelogar just eviscerated the forced-birth eejeeit.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:40 AM
Mar 2024

Whew!

The forced-birth doc who might not like abortion doesn't balance with the de-stabilizing effect internationally. She got the final word and it was clear and solid and forceful.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
22. Yes, but the way the conservative justices are presenting their hypothetical questions,
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:55 AM
Mar 2024

I am not confident about this at all

The courts have no business in the approval of drugs over the FDA


lindysalsagal

(22,851 posts)
20. MSNBC pundits agree: The suit was a flop: No standing.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:52 AM
Mar 2024

They never even got past the question of standing, and never discussed the function of FDA approvals.

LeftInTX

(34,031 posts)
26. Just read an AP article. Standing is an issue.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:35 AM
Mar 2024

I guess another case will come along.

However, surprised there wasn't over reach, but pretty sure Roberts and another one would have tossed the case if standing was an issue. I'm sure Alito and Thomas wouldn't give a s_____

rubbersole

(11,131 posts)
24. The oligarch funded Federalist Society is the root of the illegitimate contemporary SC.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:20 AM
Mar 2024

The 30+ year effort is paying off. Just getting started in their minds. Voters will stop this. Decades of work/vigilance ahead.

Bev54

(13,356 posts)
27. The RW Judge shopping has also brought this upon the country and Mitch McConnell says they should continue.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:40 AM
Mar 2024

KS Toronado

(23,478 posts)
28. Sometimes I think repugs do shit like this for one reason
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:47 AM
Mar 2024

Keep the population as high as possible so there's more people than jobs keeping wages low, thus their
overhead.

Bluethroughu

(7,215 posts)
31. They are coming after women's right to vote next.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 12:33 PM
Mar 2024

We need to have a massive Democratic Tsunami to add more Justices to the Supreme Court with term limits and criminal liability for bribery, overturn Citizens United, pass one vote right of all American citizens, and dump the electoral college.

Now, let's get it done at home and the Federal level.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
32. THEY LITERALLY BROUGHT UP THE COMSTOCK ACT. ETA sorry for yelling...
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 01:26 PM
Mar 2024

Goddamit

On edit:
Sorry I yelled. Suddenly I miss my friend Leona so much. All during the Trump years (and beyond) she’d periodically phone me to fume: “Do you know what they just did?! “ and then we could have a good mutual rant for an hour. She died one year ago, and damn, I could use one of those phone calls right now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watching the coverage of ...