Will this Fani trial judge dismiss the case?

[MOMFUDSKI]

Federalist Society is expecting certain results, of course.

[Botany]

1. No

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218816700

[dlk]

2. After watching the arguments so far, it's doubtful

Trump’s attorneys are using pretzel logic to bamboozle the judge. It doesn’t appear to be working. Of course, when it comes to Trump’s dirty dealings, nothing is certain.

[Mad_Machine76]

4. What hearing is this?

[dlk]

7. Trump's Georgia RICO case

His attorneys filed a motion to dismiss based on the First Amendment.

[Mad_Machine76]

12. Thanks!

So much to keep up with!

[dlk]

13. My pleasure

There's so much criminality to keep up with

[Ocelot II]

3. No.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

5. Yet another context free OP referencing some obscure statement with no link. "Expecting"? Pregnant?

[Sympthsical]

6. There's another Georgia pre-trial hearing

Trump's lawyers are more or less arguing that what Trump's accused of aren't even crimes and should never have been charged.

I imagine the reference to "expecting results" is that Federalist Society types are expecting a judge who is a member to rule in their favor.

I do not see McAfee dismissing the case. He bent over backwards to split the baby in everything so as to avoid being responsible for the case imploding. He's not going to flip the switch now.

Edit for clarity: This hearing is the result of a motion filed back in December. This is basically just the trial resuming after the Willis/Wade detour.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

9. Thanks. I was absent the day they implanted mind-reading tech, so I depend on kind souls like yourself. . . .nt

[Sympthsical]

11. I had to use context clues

I didn't even know there was a hearing today, lol.

[Tommy Carcetti]

10. Nope. nt