Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 12:08 PM Nov 2012

Krugman: This Is The Chart That Debunks What Everyone Says About The National Debt

KRUGMAN: This Is The Chart That Debunks What Everyone Says About The National Debt

Joe Weisenthal | Nov. 25, 2012, 11:05 AM | 18,672 | 64

Paul Krugman posts a simple chart that makes a profound point.

It compares the yield on UK debt vs. US debt.



What should stand out for you, instantly, is that the two countries borrow at virtually identical rates, and have for years.

What this should show to people is that much of the popular stories that people tell about sovereign debt is a myth.

Countries that borrow in their own currencies and can "print" at will don't have default risk, so their borrowing costs are an expression of expectations of future interest rates and growth. The US has been notably profligate since the crisis. The UK (under Cameron) has been prematurely austere. The upshot: it hasn't mattered much on the yield front.

MORE[p]

Krugman Blog LINK: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/25/incredible-credibility

- snip -

But won’t that money printing cause inflation? Not as long as the economy remains depressed. Budget deficits could lead people to expect higher inflation down the road, once the slump finally ends — but that would be a good thing for the economy in the short run, discouraging people from sitting on cash and weakening the exchange rate, thereby making exports more competitive.

The point, then, is that the whole “credibility” argument is incoherent.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: This Is The Chart That Debunks What Everyone Says About The National Debt (Original Post) Hissyspit Nov 2012 OP
The problem is ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #1
Here is how I deal with that nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #2
Debt is integral to a functioning economy, of course, ronnie624 Nov 2012 #3
Look at the post immediately following your post ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #4
There is a point that can't be helped nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #5
Lol. n/t ronnie624 Nov 2012 #7
democratic politicians' propaganda about the debt enables republicans nt msongs Nov 2012 #6
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. The problem is ...
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 01:02 PM
Nov 2012

too many people (including many Democrats) attempt apply Household Economics to the Economics of Nations with a Sovereign Currency. While the former is easier to undersatnd because we deal with it on a daily basis; it has nothing to do with the latter.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
2. Here is how I deal with that
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 01:17 PM
Nov 2012

Do you have a credit card?

Well, yes.

Do you float debt on it?

Yes.

So you mean you don't run a balanced budget?

I know it is simple, but it works.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
3. Debt is integral to a functioning economy, of course,
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 01:32 PM
Nov 2012

but infinitely accelerating debt is not logical. At some point, such a system would have to be come unstable.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
4. Look at the post immediately following your post ...
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 02:00 PM
Nov 2012

and see why your explanation (while completely accurate) doesn't work with most in the public ...

The poster say:

Debt is integral to a functioning economy ...


and,

of course, but infinitely accelerating debt is not logical. At some point, such a system would have to be come unstable.


In the same post.

Where an understanding of National Debt/Sovereign Currency would reveal that national borrowing is never "unstable", household economics can never fathom it because "eventually we have to pay our credit card bill."

The difference being, we can borrow until the global community is unwilling to buy our debt; at which point we purchase back (by "printing more money&quot our own debt; thus allowing us to issue more debt, that the global community - having been paid back, is happy to purchase.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
5. There is a point that can't be helped
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

and the propaganda that we cannot deal with this debt in a rational manner, except austerity, is strong all over the place.

But I have used this explanation in the flesh and blood, and it usually works. It puts it in a context people understand. I usually throw into it the mortgage as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: This Is The Char...