Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(63,240 posts)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 03:32 PM Nov 2012

Help with a refutation?

A friend has been complaining on FB about the "global warming controversy." In particular, he's asserted repeatedly that humans are responsible for "one sixth of one percent" of global warming.

He's not usually a flat-earther, but he is a Republican. Surprise surprise!

Obviously he won't give a citation, demanding instead that everyone else prove him wrong. I don't particularly care about proving his foolishness, but I remain kind of curious about it.

Any idea where he came up with that particular figure? He's quoted it often enough for me to think that he must have heard it somewhere.


Thanks!

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help with a refutation? (Original Post) Orrex Nov 2012 OP
Tell him the only "controversy" is that he refuses to provide a citation for his horseshit stats. nt MADem Nov 2012 #1
I'm gonna guess Limbaugh RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #2
Smells like he is talking about absolute increase in CO2 intaglio Nov 2012 #3
Thanks! Orrex Nov 2012 #4
Remember you have to use words they will understand Arcanetrance Nov 2012 #5

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Tell him the only "controversy" is that he refuses to provide a citation for his horseshit stats. nt
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:05 PM
Nov 2012
 
2. I'm gonna guess Limbaugh
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:09 PM
Nov 2012

He is the source of most of the GOP 'arguments' and he just pulls them out of his ass.

That is why Romney kept saying the most absurd stuff, why so many Republicans say off the wall stuff they feel completely confident in but can't back up...because they heard him say it, and they actually believe he tells the truth.

Limbaugh is making fools of them, because they don't know he just makes stuff up. It they ever do find out, you would think they would be mad as hell, particularly with their emotionally reactive tendencies.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
3. Smells like he is talking about absolute increase in CO2
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:13 PM
Nov 2012

Which is about 160 ppm since 1750, which is about a 58% increase or he could be talking about this as the increase in heat trapping due to this increase in CO2. In the last case he is ignoring positive feedback effects and is ignorant of compound interest calculations.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
5. Remember you have to use words they will understand
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:54 AM
Nov 2012

I would start now by making it clear your refudiating his point

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Help with a refutation?