General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsO J Simpson dead at 76:
https://www.tmz.com/2024/04/11/oj-simpson-dead-dies-cancer/shelshaw
(600 posts)Perfectly said
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)There was a time when people liked him.
Did he ever find the killer?
lastlib
(24,440 posts)I was amazed at how often the "real killer" hung out on golf courses.
Cha
(303,109 posts)RipVanWinkle
(257 posts)Just saw the breaking news on BBC.
claudette
(4,263 posts)For his kids.
Emile
(27,869 posts)obamanut2012
(27,458 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,698 posts)Rest In Purgatory O.J.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,608 posts)Hugin
(34,338 posts)They have sources ev-er-y-where (because they pay).
It's rare that a celebrity death gets reported in the MSM before TMZ has it splashed across their home page.
Skittles
(157,140 posts)my sympathy to his children
617Blue
(1,530 posts)good riddance piece of fecal matter.
eShirl
(18,698 posts)lpbk2713
(43,111 posts)SergeStorms
(19,262 posts)And it wasn't John Elway.
malaise
(275,715 posts)But a flawed man.
MorbidButterflyTat
(2,493 posts)and set records as running back for the Bills.
ESPN did an excellent 30 for 30: "OJ, Made in America," a five part series, was absolutely heartbreaking. He grew up in poverty and racism, then became a star. It's all so damn tragic.
For anyone interested:
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/16347689/made-america-five-part-30-30-documentary-event-espn
malaise
(275,715 posts)and thanks
MorbidButterflyTat
(2,493 posts)Goodheart
(5,760 posts)malaise
(275,715 posts)With this announcement and life story
SergeStorms
(19,262 posts)an absolutly horrible human being.
I didn't know he had cancer. Oh well.
The world will go on.
Johnny2X2X
(21,139 posts)That was the biggestr mistake a prosecutor has ever made in such a big case. The entire case was built on that glove, the prosecutor made it so. The prosecutor then created undeniable reasonable doubt by having him try it on and not having it fit. Now you and I know that gloves can shrink, or you can just flex your hand and a glove won't go on, but as a jurist, you just cannot know. The prosecutor is the one who made the glove such a big deal all trial, and then they showed you it might not even have been able to be worn by Simpson. They hear, "this is the killer's glove" like 100 times, and then saw that it might not have been possible that the glove would even fit the defendent. If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.
SergeStorms
(19,262 posts)pointed out to the jury, that a blood- soaked glove - when dry - would shrink and be deformed to the point where it wouldn't fit anyone!
Why she didn't do that.....we'll never know.
Johnnie Cochran get away with "muder," figuratively speaking, with that little stunt.
Marcia Clark let a murderer get off by not recognizing that stunt.
Johnny2X2X
(21,139 posts)Cochrane wasn't the one who asked him to try on the glove. It was the prosecutors who did, Chris Darden to be specific. Just incredible incompetence.
They had to talk about it. No one on the prosecution's team thought to try a leather glove on as an example to see how it might play out in court? Anyone knows you can flex your hand to not mke a glove fit. All they had to do was thnk about that and they never would have asked OJ to try on the glove. Just pathetic.
I mean, go grab any glove and try to put it on while trying to not have it fit, it's easy to make it look like it doesn't fit. You have to wiggle your fingers and squirm to get into a leather glove.
mnmoderatedem
(3,821 posts)They had a representative of the glove manufacturer testify that the glove had indeed shrunk, and they had OJ try on a regular pair of the same type gloves to demonstrate that they did in fact fit. Did not seem to have much affect on the jury though. Major mistake to have OJ try on the glove in the first place.
But I have a feeling he may have been acquitted anyway. Just my gut feeling regarding celebrity in the US.
SergeStorms
(19,262 posts)I always thought it was Cochran who produced the whole, "if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit," BS.
That and the LAPD screwing up the chain of evidence for the DNA samples really screwed up the whole trial.
Thanks for setting me straight.
Johnny2X2X
(21,139 posts)To this day, even though I am sure OJ killed them, I think if I was in that jury room, and I had to take into account only what was presented as evidence, I don't know that I could have convicted. Just going by what the prosecution said I would have to acquit. They told me in no uncertain terms that the glove was worn by the killer, if that glove did in fact not fit OJ, there's no way he could have been the killer. This was according to just what the prosecution said. I don't know if that glove fit OJ or not, the prosecution basically said it has to fit him or he's not the killer. So after it didn't fit him, then the prosecution had to come up with more witnesses to say the glove may have shrunk. I don't think it shrunk, I think OJ just flexxed his hand so he couldn't get it on, but there was reasonable doubt right there, and it ws established by the prosecution.
SergeStorms
(19,262 posts)in my mind. You could tell it had been soaked in blood. It was all stiff and sort of crumpled up. Leather gloves will do that if you just get them wet with water.
The prosecution didn't make any effort to straighten the glove out or make it supple again. They wanted the "shock value" of the jury seeing the dried blood all over it, I guess.
The LAPD and District Attorney really blew the entire case. Then there was Mark Furman. He was another straw that broke the camel's back. Any one of those things alone probably would have been enough to get the jury to
acquit. Put them all together......no chance at all of a guilty verdict.
Disaffected
(4,911 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 11, 2024, 12:32 PM - Edit history (1)
The biggest mistake was having him trying to put on the glove when he also had surgical gloves on (makes it much more difficult to pull the glove on even if it would normally not be a very tight fit).
I would disagree though that the entire case was built on the glove. There was also conclusive DNA evidence although the importance of that seems to have escaped the members of the jury based on after-trial interviews (eg. "So what if there was DNA found at the scene - there's DNA all over the place" and, "I felt the DNA expert was talking down to us so I didn't pay attention to her testimony" ).
Johnny2X2X
(21,139 posts)Either way, this was a driving glove, the type of glove that you have to wriggle your hand into to get on and then probably have to take time to pull the loose spots between the fingers to make sure your fingers are all the way into it. And this was a former professional athlete who made his living holding onto a football, you don't think that person had big and really muscular hands?
I have big and strong hands, it takes me a minute to get into work gloves before I do yard work. If I want to make it look like they won't even go over the palm of my hand all I have to do is flex. To not know all of this was complete idiocy. The defense barely had to do anything to get an acquital after the prosecutors torpedoed their entire case with that glove stunt. It was not needed, they had a strong case, what if the glove had fit easily, thenwhat? Would their case be any stronger? All it could do was hurt their case.
I can imagine the jurors talking, "Well, the prosecutor wouldn't shut up about that glove for all these weeks, all we heard about was the glove, the glove, the glove. We know for a fact the murderer wore that glove if we believe the prosecutors at all. Is anyone here sure that OJ could get into that glove? If not, then I don't see how we can know for sure he's the murdere since the prosecutor was so adament the murdere wore those gloves. Everything else is moot."
Spazito
(53,257 posts)as a key witness and the one who found the glove, was also a big mistake because the prosecution didn't bring up his racism and the tape in his initial questioning and, not doing that, gave the defense the opportunity to raise it making Fuhrman's testimony no longer credible.
whopis01
(3,674 posts)And the jurors got to hear tapes of him using the n-word talking about where black people should and should not live.
Reasonable doubt is not very hard to achieve when you have someone like that.
Spazito
(53,257 posts)but wasn't surprised when he was acquitted due to the egregious errors on the part of the prosecution and the behavior of Judge Ito.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)Spazito
(53,257 posts)given everything that happened during the trial, it has a certain ring to it.
whopis01
(3,674 posts)Luz
(781 posts)Good riddance to bad trash.
Ontheboundry
(219 posts)That this man deserves to burn
Ontheboundry
(219 posts)When I quick look at foxs comments on this look the same.as.DU comments. Like, you are loathed universally by everyone. Enjoy the heat OJ
UTUSN
(71,959 posts)Duncanpup
(13,556 posts)Takket
(22,373 posts)🥳
Botany
(71,876 posts)He is one person I would be delighted never to hear or read about again. The stats had him as one
in 55 billion as not being involved in the murders which meant if all the planets from Mercury out to
Pluto all had the population of earth and all those people came to L.A. on the night of the twin killings
only one person named O.J. could have done it.
Btw Trump is in a large part responsible for the 14 million dead from C-19.
PCIntern
(26,457 posts)One of the few times in my lifetime wherein nearly EVERYONE was talking about the same thing at the same time.
Hes gone. Poof. Just like that.
meadowlander
(4,656 posts)and interrupted it to yell "OJ was acquitted" like they were announcing "Japan just bombed Pearl Harbor".
People didn't have smart phones at the time so most of the class ran out to go back to their dorms to read about it online.
WarGamer
(14,410 posts)One of the most talented NFL RB's in history... ran with a smoothness and speed nearly unmatched...
And at the same time, obviously capable of beastly acts... probably killing 2 human beings in a fit of rage.
jalan48
(14,161 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(2,827 posts)to the Brown and goldman estates....do we need to say anymore
DET
(1,590 posts)Diagnosed two months ago. He was undergoing chemo and in hospice at the time of his death. He must have had stage four cancer, but it wouldnt have killed him that quickly unless it went to his brain or a vital organ. I guess its also possible that he was so debilitated that complications of chemo took him out. I wont celebrate his demise, but I wont mourn it either.
H2O Man
(74,835 posts)I mean, he could really run with the ball. Tough guy, who beat up women. When he was doing massive quantities of cocaine, his temper got the better of him, and he slaughtered two innocent human beings in one of the most brutal crimes of that era. But he was great in those television commercials, and was found "not guilty" by a jury that ignored all the evidence.
meadowlander
(4,656 posts)That's the best I can do...
H2O Man
(74,835 posts)And, at least so far as we know, he didn't butcher anyone on the set. Surely that counts for something.
LeftInTX
(29,205 posts)Played a recruit.
LeftInTX
(29,205 posts)Shut up TV!!!...I said the case is closed for good..
Don't wanna here anymore about it!!
doc03
(36,274 posts)LonePirate
(13,807 posts)Kingofalldems
(39,073 posts)Probably not though.
Xolodno
(6,613 posts)However....
1. DNA evidence was still a bit "new" and most people didn't understand it.
2. The police had a bit of a "reputation" and not in a good way.
3. The police investigation seemed to be haphazard.
4. The prosecution wasn't on the same page at times and focused on the wrong things.
5. The gloves, talk about a blunder. Cochran was probably doing a jig afterwards.
6. Furman, another major blunder. But to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if the defense called him in as a hostile witness. His involvement and previous encounters put a stain on everything.
7. Sequestering the Jury for that long, at that point, whatever the majority was, everyone would have just changed their votes to it.
8. Strong possibility of an accomplice. An arthritic person overpowering two people with only a single cut on his hand, no bruises or any other wounds, etc.
9. Not securing key witnesses ahead of time and then seeing them pop up on a talk show, rendering them unusable.
10. Many other blunders by the prosecution.
I honestly don't see how they could have gotten a conviction.