Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dear_Prudence

(783 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 11:24 AM Apr 2024

48 years before statehood

If the law 48 years before statehood applies, then wouldn't about half the states remain subjects of the Crown? So, should those of us from the senior states curtsy before British aristocracy? Are some western states that were formerly Indian territory subject to tribal law? Is illegal immigration into Texas nullified because, 48 years before statehood, much of Texas was part of Mexico? The Dobbs decision holds that "from the 1200s to 1960, no statute, no English case, no state case... hinted at an abortion right". So, count on more ancient practices way beyond the 1800s; wife selling anyone?

Quotation from SCOTUS Blog https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/dobbss-history-and-the-future-of-abortion-and-privacy-law/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
48 years before statehood (Original Post) Dear_Prudence Apr 2024 OP
It was re-codified in 1901, 1928, and 1977. sinkingfeeling Apr 2024 #1
Chess Dear_Prudence Apr 2024 #2
Ahhh - I just JustAnotherGen Apr 2024 #3

Dear_Prudence

(783 posts)
2. Chess
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 11:38 AM
Apr 2024

You are right. They played chess, I am playing checkers. But Dobbs referring to English precedents from 1200 worries me. We haven't re- codified all ancient law so what next?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»48 years before statehood