Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsApplebaum: Why Republicans Are Defending Israel and Ignoring Ukraine
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/04/ukraine-israel-war-comparison/678077/No paywall link
https://archive.li/i32ck
On April 13, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel. Also on April 13, as well as on April 12, 14, and 15, the Russian Federation launched missiles and drones at Ukraineincluding some designed in Iran.
Few of the weapons launched by Iran hit their mark. Instead, American and European airplanes, alongside Israeli and even Jordanian airplanes, knocked the drones and missiles out of the sky.
By contrast, some of the attacks launched by Russia did destroy their targets. Ukraine, acting alone, andthanks to the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representativesrunning short on defensive ammunition, was unable to knock all of the drones and missiles out of the sky.
On April 12 Russian strikes badly damaged an energy facility in Dnipropetrovsk. On April 13, a 61-year-old woman and 68-year-old man were killed by a Russian strike in Kharkiv. On April 14, an aerial bomb hit an apartment building in Ocheretyne, killing one and injuring two. On April 15, a Russian guided missile hit a school and killed at least two more people in the Kharkiv region.
Why the difference in reaction? Why did American and European jets scramble to help Israel, but not Ukraine? Why doesnt Ukraine have enough matériel to defend itself? One difference is the balance of nuclear power. Russia has nuclear weapons, and its propagandists periodically threaten to use them. That has made the U.S. and Europe reluctant to enter the skies over Ukraine. Israel also has nuclear weapons, but that affects the calculus in a different way: It means that the U.S., Europe, and even some Arab states are eager to make sure that Israel is never provoked enough to use them, or indeed to use any serious conventional weapons, against Iran.
*snip*
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Applebaum: Why Republicans Are Defending Israel and Ignoring Ukraine (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Apr 2024
OP
Good read. Republicans ironicly push Iran into nukes but are too stupid to realize it
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2024
#3
FalloutShelter
(14,340 posts)1. Nice try Ann...
Its actually because Ukraine gave Donny Dipshit the brush off on Biden ratfuck and TSF wants them dead now.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)2. Link via MSN. archive.li doesn't stop loading
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/why-republicans-are-defending-israel-and-ignoring-ukraine/ar-BB1lFxJl
The WayBack machine has other servers than the Lithuanian one.
The WayBack machine has other servers than the Lithuanian one.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)3. Good read. Republicans ironicly push Iran into nukes but are too stupid to realize it
Idiot authoritarian-wanna-bes stupidly sold out. For what? A small amount of leverage on the body politic. Money doesn't have to change hands when the corrupting allure of power is enough.
For the rest of the world, there are some lessons here. Plenty of countries, perhaps including Ukraine and Iran, will draw the first and most obvious conclusion: Nuclear weapons make you much safer. Not only can you deter attacks with a nuclear shield, and not only can you attack other countries with comparative impunity, but you can also, under certain circumstances, expect others to join in your defense.
Perhaps others will draw the other obvious conclusion: A part of the Republican Partyone large enough to mattercan be co-opted, lobbied, or purchased outright. Not only can you get it to repeat your propaganda; you can get it to act directly in your interests. This probably doesnt cost even a fraction of the price of tanks and artillery, and it can be far more effective.
Perhaps others will draw the other obvious conclusion: A part of the Republican Partyone large enough to mattercan be co-opted, lobbied, or purchased outright. Not only can you get it to repeat your propaganda; you can get it to act directly in your interests. This probably doesnt cost even a fraction of the price of tanks and artillery, and it can be far more effective.