Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(131,038 posts)
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 10:35 PM Apr 2024

"The Russian military is purchasing Starlink terminals from SpaceX, with supplies coming from the USA, Europe,

https://sfba.social/@skykiss/112261008902139853

“The Russian military is purchasing Starlink terminals from SpaceX, with supplies coming from the USA, Europe, UAE, Canada, Germany and Kazakhstan.

This was found out by specialists from the OSINT agency Molfar, who studied the assortment and spoke directly with terminal sellers”

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The Russian military is purchasing Starlink terminals from SpaceX, with supplies coming from the USA, Europe, (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2024 OP
KICK orangecrush Apr 2024 #1
This way the Russians can block Ukraine from communicating on the battlefront... Deuxcents Apr 2024 #2
Elon Musk is dangerous. nt KPN Apr 2024 #3
Here is the title at the link. They are black market starlink. applegrove Apr 2024 #5
The DOJ's Criminal Division had better have a sitdown with Musk about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. ancianita Apr 2024 #17
I think when Musk claimed no knowledge... lame54 Apr 2024 #25
Typically when stuff gets on the black market the applegrove Apr 2024 #27
ford sold trucks to hitler both of them hated jews nt msongs Apr 2024 #4
They are blackmarket starlink. applegrove Apr 2024 #6
Black Market hardware Johnny2X2X Apr 2024 #16
You're right. Musk knows about it and is playing ignorant. ancianita Apr 2024 #18
C Y B E R Trucks are on the way! TeamProg Apr 2024 #12
Article... littlemissmartypants Apr 2024 #7
When I worked for a DOD contractor ... aggiesal Apr 2024 #8
There stuff ends up in the black market. I would think they should investigate applegrove Apr 2024 #10
OFAC FrankChurchDem Apr 2024 #20
If so, how are Musk evading the sanctions against Russia? DJ Synikus Makisimus Apr 2024 #9
Musk claims no involvement. applegrove Apr 2024 #11
What does no involvement mean? He's the CEO of the company right? Fla Dem Apr 2024 #15
He does not see any transaction on the black market. applegrove Apr 2024 #24
But he -does- know that recievers are operating in Russia. Shipwack Apr 2024 #31
Coca-cola is not sanctioned afaik unblock Apr 2024 #29
Something's not right about that. We didn't sell battle aids to the nazis in WWll. brush Apr 2024 #13
"Wholly owned, independent arm's length entities." DFW Apr 2024 #14
I think it is just buyers who resell stuff on the black market. No applegrove Apr 2024 #22
He is not. It is the black market. Musk has no control over that. applegrove Apr 2024 #23
misleading title from the link WarGamer Apr 2024 #19
SpaceX is required FrankChurchDem Apr 2024 #21
Excellent point. Unfortunately he still has a small number of devotees here who want to explain away everything. BannonsLiver Apr 2024 #26
Hardly a day passes we don't learn something else shady about Elon Musk. I wish he'd been in the driver's ... marble falls Apr 2024 #28
So... Let me get this straight. Shipwack Apr 2024 #30

applegrove

(131,038 posts)
5. Here is the title at the link. They are black market starlink.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 12:54 AM
Apr 2024

"SNIP........

Black market Starlink terminals in use by Russian forces in Ukraine, other US foes, Musk claims no knowledge

..........SNIP"

STILL - a billionaire with such a potential to 'turn' a war is something that should be thought through.

ancianita

(43,162 posts)
17. The DOJ's Criminal Division had better have a sitdown with Musk about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:35 AM
Apr 2024

Individuals may be criminally and civilly liable under both the anti-bribery and accounting provisions of the FCPA for direct violations, for conspiring to violate the FCPA, and for aiding and abetting a violation by another, particularly a country like Russia, under Treasury and other sanctions.

I hope that at the very least, Musk is being monitored.

Johnny2X2X

(23,825 posts)
16. Black Market hardware
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:12 AM
Apr 2024

But they still have to have a subscription activated and they'd know where they were being activated from and that they were fraudluent. If the Russian military is using black market hardware and then hacking into Starlink, Starlink would know about it.

aggiesal

(10,638 posts)
8. When I worked for a DOD contractor ...
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 01:20 AM
Apr 2024

we weren't allowed to sell anything with military capability to any foreign country without permission from the DOD and some other agency, I think it was the FTC.

How is SpaceX able to get away with this?

applegrove

(131,038 posts)
10. There stuff ends up in the black market. I would think they should investigate
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 01:29 AM
Apr 2024

some buyers. Because this stinks.

FrankChurchDem

(12,692 posts)
20. OFAC
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:53 AM
Apr 2024

Treasury. They take matters like this very seriously. I would suspect that they're conducting an investigation but I know their wheels turn very, very slowly.

DJ Synikus Makisimus

(1,260 posts)
9. If so, how are Musk evading the sanctions against Russia?
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 01:21 AM
Apr 2024

The article referenced is rather vague about it. Anyone involved should be charged & convicted if the USA is serious about sanctions. So probably not. Coca-Cola is making record profits in Russia, for example. We care more about corporate profit that accrues to the mega-wealthy than we care about Russian imperialist expansionism and genocide. I've long thought that Musk should have his assets seized, his citizenship stripped and be deported back to South Africa. Fascist pig. DOJ should find a way.

Fla Dem

(27,485 posts)
15. What does no involvement mean? He's the CEO of the company right?
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:09 AM
Apr 2024

He can stop whatever transactions are happening with Russia. By taking no action he is responsible.

Shipwack

(3,032 posts)
31. But he -does- know that recievers are operating in Russia.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 02:44 PM
Apr 2024

Remember when he shut down the recievers Ukraine was using to guide vehicles to Russian warships?

If Musk really doesn't know about these black market recievers in Russia (which I highly doubt), it's because he's actively going out of his way to not know.

unblock

(56,072 posts)
29. Coca-cola is not sanctioned afaik
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 02:14 PM
Apr 2024

North Korea is subject to blanket sanctions. Iran as well.

But not Russia. Several different rounds of sanctions actively apply to Russia but it's not 100% everything.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
13. Something's not right about that. We didn't sell battle aids to the nazis in WWll.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 03:19 AM
Apr 2024

WTF is Musk allowed to get away with that now?

I suspect because he's a fucking nazi himself.

DFW

(59,877 posts)
14. "Wholly owned, independent arm's length entities."
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 03:44 AM
Apr 2024

It's a common enough structure. For example, since the EU tries to tax any non-EU company on its worldwide income, many non-EU companies wishing to do business there purchase existing EU companies and keep them as completely independent, separate entities. Since it would be grossly unfair for the EU to tax, say, Arby's on its entire US income just because they opened two retail outlets in Frankfurt, Arby's (or whoever) would form "Arby's Deutschland" (or whatever), incorporate there, and let their German operation operate and be taxed where their business is. Whatever is left over after taxes, the owning company, Arby's USA (or whatever it's called) can either repatriate the profits or re-invest them for growth of the local business as they see fit. The owner company in the USA can not interfere with the independence of the foreign entity, or else the independence of the foreign entity could be challenged. Therefore, if Musk owns a company in a foreign country that has no sanctions with Russia, that company can do business with Russia with far less scrutiny. Musk could still get in trouble with the US authorities, but they'd have to do a thorough investigation to prove the connection before they can take action.

I have an ex-pat Iranian friend who has been living in Germany for almost all his life. His family still has a house on the Island of Kish, the Iranian Hong Kong, where Dick Cheney (now in the name of Halliburton) still owns a house. He said that Iran still does business with every country in the world except Israel, sanctions or no sanctions. They just go through third parties/countries.

WarGamer

(18,319 posts)
19. misleading title from the link
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:38 AM
Apr 2024

Russia NOT buying from SpaceX.

Russia buying black market units from folks who are breaking the TOS from Starlink.

FrankChurchDem

(12,692 posts)
21. SpaceX is required
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 11:55 AM
Apr 2024

By OFAC to be proactive for which it appears they are not. I'm sure OFAC has taken notice but their enforcement division is in total overwhelm from all the sanctions in the past few years.

marble falls

(71,396 posts)
28. Hardly a day passes we don't learn something else shady about Elon Musk. I wish he'd been in the driver's ...
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 01:32 PM
Apr 2024

... seat of the Tesla he put into space.

Shipwack

(3,032 posts)
30. So... Let me get this straight.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 02:38 PM
Apr 2024

Musk can tell where Ukrainian Starlink receivers are with enough precision that he can turn them off when they are approaching the Ukrainian-Russian border.

At the same time, he can't detect Starlink receivers in Russia, nor do anything to prevent them from being used.

Got it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Russian military is ...