Can potential jurors get in trouble if they really let TFG have it when asked if they can be fair and impartial?

[bbernardini]

We've all imagined what we would say to his face if we had the opportunity. Could a potential juror get in trouble for letting loose on TFG while they're being questioned?

[hlthe2b]

1. They'd immediately be cut off by the Judge and excused.

Most people are on best "behavior" in court settings--even while they largely try to be truthful. Even those who might have strong feelings will likely couch it in as civil and noninflammatory way as possible. That isn't to say they won't own up to those feelings.

I went through this when asked about my feelings about guns when called for jury duty during voir dire. I did not know WHY I was being asked this but merely stated my general feelings in a matter-of-fact manner as possible and avoided getting into details or tangents and I did not express any emotional nor judgemental opinions.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

2. Regardless of what the judge would do, Trumpers would quickly upend the life of anyone who did that.

[Voltaire2]

3. If they want to let TSF 'have it' STFU about that and just state 'yes' to 'can you be impartial?'

And then after evaluating the evidence, vote 'guilty'.

[RockRaven]

4. One can be fair and impartial while also concluding that TFG is a piece of shit.

Because he IS a piece of shit.

[brooklynite]

5. And one can feel that way without saying that to him in Court.

I wouldn't have any such inclination.