General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Media warns Nasdaq of suspected market manipulation
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/19/markets/trump-media-nasdaq-suspected-market-manipulation/index.htmlNew York
CNN
Trump Media, the parent company of the former presidents Truth Social, alerted Nasdaq Inc. on Thursday of what the company suspects is illegal activity driving down the price of its shares.
In a letter to the exchange, Devin Nunes, the CEO of Trump Media (DJT), laid out what he believes could be deemed naked short selling.
Naked short selling involves someone selling shares they dont own or have not borrowed. They will often then try to buy shares at a reduced price to cover themselves. This practice is generally illegal. Whereas legitimate short sellers, people who seek to benefit from declines in the value of a companys shares, borrow the shares before selling.
The letter was made public Friday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Nunes also noted in the letter that shares of the company were on a list the Nasdaq maintains thats indicative of unlawful trading activity.
*snip*
spanone
(142,062 posts)FuckHim
SWBTATTReg
(26,401 posts)never admit that the fundamentals of the company are so bad, that the price of the shares must drop, to accurately reflect the realistic price/earnings share. They (the shares) still have a ways to drop. For those that bought the stock at its horribly high PE ratio, well, be prepared to sit there for a very long time, if forever, to ever regain your money.
struggle4progress
(126,683 posts)Scrivener7
(60,075 posts)Irish_Dem
(82,366 posts)When they win they believe they are the smartest people alive.
VMA131Marine
(5,336 posts)if he thought it would make him more money?
Of course he would.
RockRaven
(19,755 posts)Instead of being the predictable/expected outcome given that highly publicized widely reported information... it is a secret plot of voluminous illegal activity -- of which you have no direct evidence.
Yeah, sounds legit.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)They SHOULD but they never do. They SHOULD ban ALL institutional short selling & shorting of low volume stocks. But they wont because too many high earners make tons of money smashing stock prices of legit companies using things like "citizens petitions" & the like.
However, in THIS case, I'll be a hypocrite and say SHORT THE SHIT OUT OF IT. Although there are no shares available to short & the COST is very high for those who are doing it.
louis-t
(24,654 posts)Your worthless stock should be going up because YOU say so?
C_U_L8R
(49,534 posts)It's the narcissist's way to divert and distract
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.