General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo they want to find Trump $1000 for gag order violations?
It's a joke, right?
Same as telling him there's no punishment, just keep doing it.
Ocelot II
(131,679 posts)getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)he can do either or both. up to 30 days.
orangecrush
(31,692 posts)I guess.
orangecrush
(31,692 posts)I guess jail time is also an option, but will probably not see that.
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,207 posts)the prosecution is making it clear that they're not asking for jail time............yet, but they do want the judge to find Been-A-Dick Donald in contempt and assign fines of $1000.00 per violation.
MSNBC is reporting that the judge is becoming pissed at Been-A-Dick's lawyer.
orangecrush
(31,692 posts)I would love to see him in a holding cell with 15 or so badasses.
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,207 posts)and it possibly may happen if Been-A-Dick keeps up his crap.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,553 posts)I saw one lawyer on the tv machine say give him 30 days suspended. (I would suspend 29 days and let him cool his heels in the clink for 24 hours or maybe a day behind bars and let him out at 11 pm.)
I would add, order the secret service management make a plan to facilitate a day or two in the cell in the event that happens.
onenote
(46,323 posts)and more than any TV talking head.
Judges virtually never jail someone the first time they are accused by the prosecution of violating a gag order, particularly when the violation did not disrupt the trial in front of a jury. Which is why Bragg didn't ask for jail time -- the judge would not be happy if he thought Bragg was over-reaching.
But as I've noted previously, Bragg and the judge following standard practice will undoubtedly be criticized sharply by some who mistakenly think that anyone else would be jailed.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,917 posts)They either don't know or don't care that jail time is NOT being requested by the DA - yet.
Drama queens and instigators. They're everywhere.
Emile
(43,926 posts)courthouse microphone and lock him up in the courthouse cell until the trial is over.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)we can do it
(13,037 posts)triron
(22,240 posts)we can do it
(13,037 posts)Walleye
(45,735 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,737 posts)unblock
(56,304 posts)Emile
(43,926 posts)according to some people.
unblock
(56,304 posts)Emile
(43,926 posts)sl8
(17,154 posts)onenote
(46,323 posts)That's the per violation limit in a criminal case. There is no limit in a civil case. Just a coincidence that in the civil case Judge Engoron imposed a $10K fine.
sl8
(17,154 posts)onenote
(46,323 posts)This article will help explain the different types of contempt proceedings and penalties.
https://www.justsecurity.org/94878/why-trump-will-likely-be-held-in-contempt-and-what-then/
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)from cnn....
Judge Juan Merchan said he wants to hear an assertion under oath that Donald Trump believed he wasn't violating the gag order when he made the posts in question.
Under oath means he can find he lied. Under oath. Or if he says he defied the order, take appropriate action. Or he can take the fifth. Then the judge can rule anyway.
orangecrush
(31,692 posts)Thanks!
Happy Hoosier
(9,700 posts)Srkdqltr
(10,078 posts)republianmushroom
(22,865 posts)onenote
(46,323 posts)the statute permits or what the prosecutor has requested?
Mme. Defarge
(9,106 posts)based on a defendants ability to pay?
onenote
(46,323 posts)sl8
(17,154 posts)onenote
(46,323 posts)Thus, they are asking for $10,000. When they first moved for sanctions, they only identified three violations and asked for $3000.
sl8
(17,154 posts)orangecrush
(31,692 posts)On CNN.
Guess I was wrong.
Still, $10,000 is an invitation.
sl8
(17,154 posts)onenote
(46,323 posts)Conjuay
(3,121 posts)N/a
FlyingPiggy
(3,748 posts)We would have been arrested. Marchan is a weak judge!!!
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)Before any non-financial penalty is given, they have to impose the maximum financial penalty.
They aren't doing it to be lenient. They are doing it to ensure against appeal.