Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
I know the MAGA SCOTUS would not have done this, but...
they could have issued a ruling that said we find the actions brought under indictment not to have any claims of Presidential immunity.
Then, they could have done Bush v. Gore and said this ruling is not extended beyond this immediate case.
Thus, preserving their right to rule at a later date on spurious claims of Presidential Immunity.
But, nooooo......
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
…shouldn’t we settle this question of if a president can pardon him or herself now since if we don’t confer immunity now, it will become the practice of all presidents to simply pardon themselves.
just deal with the f’ing question on the table.
