General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump considering a 10% tariff on all imports to the U.S.
... inflation fighting at its best
Trump: It may be more than that. It may be a derivative of that. A derivative of that. But it will be somebodylook when they come in and they steal our jobs, and they steal our wealth, they steal our country.
When you say more than that, though: You mean maybe more than 10% on all imports?
Trump: More than 10%, yeah. I call it a ring around the country. We have a ring around the country. A reciprocal tax also, in addition to what we said. And if we do that, the numbers are staggering. I don't believe it will have much of an effect because they're making so much money off of us. I also don't believe that the costs will go up that much. And a lot of people say, Oh, that's gonna be a tax on us. I don't believe that. I think it's a tax on the country that's doing it. And I know. Look, I took in billions of dollars from China. Nobody else ever did anything on China. I also let people know what the threat of China was. China was going along making $500 to $600 billion a year and nobody was ever even mentioning it until I came along. What's happening in Detroit is very sad because electric cars with this EV mandate, which is ridiculous, because they don't go far. They cost too much and they're going to be made in China. They're all going to be made in China.
https://time.com/6972022/donald-trump-transcript-2024-election/
budkin
(6,849 posts)Insanity. Biden needs to hammer this home.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Biden wants to triple tariffs.
Biden calls for a tripling of tariffs on Chinese steel as he makes economic pitch in Pittsburgh
Speaking from the United Steelworkers headquarters, Biden called on United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai to consider tripling the existing 7.5% tariff rate on Chinese steel and aluminum through a review of the Section 301 tariff rate, pending the conclusion of a four-year review.
Officials expect the ongoing review to be completed soon, and Tai could take action to (enhance) the effectiveness of the tariffs based on its findings, a senior official said.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/17/politics/biden-tariffs-chinese-steel-economic-pitch/index.html
ProfessorGAC
(76,695 posts)...that prices wouldn't be affected.
So, Biden's proposal & TFG's musings are apples & oranges.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,695 posts)I'm sure you just heard that soubd.
FarPoint
(14,765 posts)one is identifying tRump trash talk that will please his base.....not that this claim would ever come into his reality....
so...it's trash...
former9thward
(33,424 posts)C_U_L8R
(49,384 posts)Trump is a fucking idiot. And anyone who votes for this clown is even worse.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/17/politics/biden-tariffs-chinese-steel-economic-pitch/index.html
CelticCrow
(78 posts)They are used to protect against particular circumstances such as the Chinese government subsidizing it's steel manufacturers to be able to dump the product into markets at prices US companies can't possibly compete with in order to drive those companies out of business. Tariffs can be used to level the playing field so that customers can choose between US and Chinese steel.
China doesn't pay anything on the tariffs, the importer pays the tariff so unless it's a Chinese company importing goods from China there's no impact. The importer will obviously push those costs down to the consumer, they won't just take one for the team. So blanket tariffs like Trump is wanting to do will just raise prices on a huge number of goods for everyone since we let a lot of our manufacturing capability go away.
Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)to drive competitors out of business, they are breaking the antitrust laws. US companies that do this can be broken up. Since we have no control over Chinese companies, we have to use tariffs.
Taxes on steel and aluminum are not the same as taxes on everything imported from China. Your headline is false.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Not just China but most countries. Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%. But don't take my word on it. The WTO says it.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf
And no, I don't see the difference between "everything" and "steel". Steel goes into a vast number of industrial and consumer products.
Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)steel and everything? Okay.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)I am a protectionist. When Trump put the tariffs on steel in China, I thought that was a good thing. When Biden kept all the Trump tariffs and raised some of them, I thought that was a good thing. I don't change my views depending on what President is in office. YMMD.
Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)Just as steel is not our only import from China, there is a lot of distance between protectionism and free trade.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)All products from China have tariffs on them.
Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf
Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)Your present post was about steel (at 7.5% tariff) being tthe same as all imports from China.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)with steel imports from China being the same as all imports from China?
But, to answer your question, I would need a lot more data about each individual import, the capacity of the USA to compete with that import, the necessity of that import to our defense, and probably a lot of other things that experts in economics and foreign policy should be asked. That is why the government doesn't hire people off the streets to set tariffs.
Freethinker65
(11,203 posts)Trump is ok with that.
Depending on the tariff, some farmers and US businesses also suffer consequences. Of course, higher prices are passed onto consumers.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/17/politics/biden-tariffs-chinese-steel-economic-pitch/index.html
speak easy
(12,598 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)The poster I replied to complained tariffs were bad for poor people. If that logic were true, are you saying a tripling of tariffs on steel would not be bad for poor people?
speak easy
(12,598 posts)And it's wrong in terms of real world impacts. Trump wants a 10% minimum tariff on ALL imports, and a 60% tariff on ALL imports from China. - not just steel.
Kingofalldems
(40,277 posts)Thanks.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)For the last three and a half years. Not just China but Europe and other areas. What is the upper limit for good tariffs?
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf
And no, I don't see the difference between "everything" and "steel". Steel goes into a vast number of industrial and consumer products.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,695 posts)A 10% or more tariff won't raise prices because the exporter will just eat it? That shows an utter lack of how companies that actually make stuff operate. That's immensely dumb.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,507 posts)is more coherent and relevant than that idiotic fool.
Emile
(42,284 posts)talking that stupid shit.
LeftinOH
(5,648 posts)Torchlight
(6,824 posts)He wrote with his eyes rolling so loudly, they could be heard in Versailles.
no_hypocrisy
(54,906 posts)walkingman
(10,862 posts)propping up the various businesses like he had to do with the Agriculture sector last time? And it has to be inflationary?
MistakenLamb
(791 posts)sop
(18,614 posts)Don't think this will get him nominated for the "Noble Prize" in economics.