Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

speak easy

(12,598 posts)
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:04 PM Apr 2024

Trump considering a 10% tariff on all imports to the U.S.

... inflation fighting at its best

Let’s shift to the economy, sir. You have floated a 10% tariff on all imports, and a more than 60% tariff on Chinese imports. Can I just ask you now: Is that your plan?

Trump: It may be more than that. It may be a derivative of that. A derivative of that. But it will be somebody—look when they come in and they steal our jobs, and they steal our wealth, they steal our country.

When you say more than that, though: You mean maybe more than 10% on all imports?

Trump: More than 10%, yeah. I call it a ring around the country. We have a ring around the country. A reciprocal tax also, in addition to what we said. And if we do that, the numbers are staggering. I don't believe it will have much of an effect because they're making so much money off of us. I also don't believe that the costs will go up that much. And a lot of people say, “Oh, that's gonna be a tax on us.” I don't believe that. I think it's a tax on the country that's doing it. And I know. Look, I took in billions of dollars from China. Nobody else ever did anything on China. I also let people know what the threat of China was. China was going along making $500 to $600 billion a year and nobody was ever even mentioning it until I came along. What's happening in Detroit is very sad because electric cars with this EV mandate, which is ridiculous, because they don't go far. They cost too much and they're going to be made in China. They're all going to be made in China.

https://time.com/6972022/donald-trump-transcript-2024-election/
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump considering a 10% tariff on all imports to the U.S. (Original Post) speak easy Apr 2024 OP
Inflation quickly multiplied by a hundred times with this plan budkin Apr 2024 #1
How can Biden do that? former9thward Apr 2024 #6
However, He Did Not Make The Silly Claim... ProfessorGAC Apr 2024 #12
What did he say would happen to prices with a tripling of steel tariffs? former9thward Apr 2024 #14
Whoosh! ProfessorGAC Apr 2024 #25
I guess the only reason we are seeing this here is... FarPoint Apr 2024 #2
What would not come into reality? former9thward Apr 2024 #7
Who pays? You pay! C_U_L8R Apr 2024 #3
Biden wants to triple tariffs. former9thward Apr 2024 #8
Tariffs have a particular purpose CelticCrow Apr 2024 #23
When US companies price things below cost Progressive dog Apr 2024 #29
There are tariffs on almost everything. former9thward Apr 2024 #32
IYu can't see va difference between Progressive dog Apr 2024 #33
You are either a free market proponent or a protectionist. former9thward Apr 2024 #35
No you don't have to be either a protectionist or proponent of free trade. Progressive dog Apr 2024 #36
I have posted the WTO sheet on U.S. tariffs at least twice in this thread. former9thward Apr 2024 #37
And who said it didn't? Progressive dog Apr 2024 #38
What is the correct tariff for products from China? former9thward Apr 2024 #39
What does that have to do Progressive dog Apr 2024 #40
Trump threatens to raise tariffs to get "favors", if countries call his bluff, poor Americans suffer the most. Freethinker65 Apr 2024 #4
Both candidates want to increase tariffs. former9thward Apr 2024 #9
This is a 10%. tariff on ALL imports speak easy Apr 2024 #11
And??? former9thward Apr 2024 #13
"Both candidates want to increase tariffs" is a both sides argument. speak easy Apr 2024 #17
I guess the poster missed that huge point. Kingofalldems Apr 2024 #18
You seem to be unaware Biden has kept Trump's tariffs on various products. former9thward Apr 2024 #19
There is a difference between a tariff on everything vs just on Chinese steel. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #21
Biden has a tariff on almost everything. former9thward Apr 2024 #24
I wish he would hurry up and flee the country. Meadowoak Apr 2024 #5
Utterly Clueless ProfessorGAC Apr 2024 #10
A baboon flinging poo MorbidButterflyTat Apr 2024 #15
That's how he crashed the economy during his presidency Emile Apr 2024 #16
Those aren't even answers - it's just more gibberish. n/t LeftinOH Apr 2024 #20
"Because the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was soooo successful." Torchlight Apr 2024 #22
JFC, almost everything we buy is imported, including produce. no_hypocrisy Apr 2024 #26
Wonder what the Tea Partiers will think about this? After all it will mean walkingman Apr 2024 #27
they'll just blame minorities or "Rothschild bankers " MistakenLamb Apr 2024 #30
Trumponomics sop Apr 2024 #28
And we'd enter ANOTHER Trump recession sakabatou Apr 2024 #31
The cult will appreciate the new prices at Walmart dalton99a Apr 2024 #34

budkin

(6,849 posts)
1. Inflation quickly multiplied by a hundred times with this plan
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:06 PM
Apr 2024

Insanity. Biden needs to hammer this home.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
6. How can Biden do that?
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:34 PM
Apr 2024

Biden wants to triple tariffs.

Biden calls for a tripling of tariffs on Chinese steel as he makes economic pitch in Pittsburgh

Speaking from the United Steelworkers headquarters, Biden called on United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai to “consider tripling” the existing 7.5% tariff rate on Chinese steel and aluminum through a review of the Section 301 tariff rate, pending the conclusion of a four-year review.

Officials expect the ongoing review to be completed “soon,” and Tai could take action to “(enhance) the effectiveness” of the tariffs based on its findings, a senior official said.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/17/politics/biden-tariffs-chinese-steel-economic-pitch/index.html

ProfessorGAC

(76,695 posts)
12. However, He Did Not Make The Silly Claim...
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:41 PM
Apr 2024

...that prices wouldn't be affected.
So, Biden's proposal & TFG's musings are apples & oranges.

FarPoint

(14,765 posts)
2. I guess the only reason we are seeing this here is...
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:07 PM
Apr 2024

one is identifying tRump trash talk that will please his base.....not that this claim would ever come into his reality....

so...it's trash...

C_U_L8R

(49,384 posts)
3. Who pays? You pay!
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:15 PM
Apr 2024

Trump is a fucking idiot. And anyone who votes for this clown is even worse.

CelticCrow

(78 posts)
23. Tariffs have a particular purpose
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 04:06 PM
Apr 2024

They are used to protect against particular circumstances such as the Chinese government subsidizing it's steel manufacturers to be able to dump the product into markets at prices US companies can't possibly compete with in order to drive those companies out of business. Tariffs can be used to level the playing field so that customers can choose between US and Chinese steel.

China doesn't pay anything on the tariffs, the importer pays the tariff so unless it's a Chinese company importing goods from China there's no impact. The importer will obviously push those costs down to the consumer, they won't just take one for the team. So blanket tariffs like Trump is wanting to do will just raise prices on a huge number of goods for everyone since we let a lot of our manufacturing capability go away.

Progressive dog

(7,602 posts)
29. When US companies price things below cost
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 05:14 PM
Apr 2024

to drive competitors out of business, they are breaking the antitrust laws. US companies that do this can be broken up. Since we have no control over Chinese companies, we have to use tariffs.
Taxes on steel and aluminum are not the same as taxes on everything imported from China. Your headline is false.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
32. There are tariffs on almost everything.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 05:35 PM
Apr 2024

Not just China but most countries. Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%. But don't take my word on it. The WTO says it.

https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf

And no, I don't see the difference between "everything" and "steel". Steel goes into a vast number of industrial and consumer products.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
35. You are either a free market proponent or a protectionist.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 06:41 PM
Apr 2024

I am a protectionist. When Trump put the tariffs on steel in China, I thought that was a good thing. When Biden kept all the Trump tariffs and raised some of them, I thought that was a good thing. I don't change my views depending on what President is in office. YMMD.

Progressive dog

(7,602 posts)
36. No you don't have to be either a protectionist or proponent of free trade.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 06:49 PM
Apr 2024

Just as steel is not our only import from China, there is a lot of distance between protectionism and free trade.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
37. I have posted the WTO sheet on U.S. tariffs at least twice in this thread.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 06:58 PM
Apr 2024

All products from China have tariffs on them.

Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%.

https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf

Progressive dog

(7,602 posts)
38. And who said it didn't?
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 07:07 PM
Apr 2024

Your present post was about steel (at 7.5% tariff) being tthe same as all imports from China.

Progressive dog

(7,602 posts)
40. What does that have to do
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 07:34 PM
Apr 2024

with steel imports from China being the same as all imports from China?
But, to answer your question, I would need a lot more data about each individual import, the capacity of the USA to compete with that import, the necessity of that import to our defense, and probably a lot of other things that experts in economics and foreign policy should be asked. That is why the government doesn't hire people off the streets to set tariffs.

Freethinker65

(11,203 posts)
4. Trump threatens to raise tariffs to get "favors", if countries call his bluff, poor Americans suffer the most.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:22 PM
Apr 2024

Trump is ok with that.

Depending on the tariff, some farmers and US businesses also suffer consequences. Of course, higher prices are passed onto consumers.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
13. And???
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:43 PM
Apr 2024

The poster I replied to complained tariffs were bad for poor people. If that logic were true, are you saying a tripling of tariffs on steel would not be bad for poor people?

speak easy

(12,598 posts)
17. "Both candidates want to increase tariffs" is a both sides argument.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:51 PM
Apr 2024

And it's wrong in terms of real world impacts. Trump wants a 10% minimum tariff on ALL imports, and a 60% tariff on ALL imports from China. - not just steel.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
19. You seem to be unaware Biden has kept Trump's tariffs on various products.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:58 PM
Apr 2024

For the last three and a half years. Not just China but Europe and other areas. What is the upper limit for good tariffs?

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
24. Biden has a tariff on almost everything.
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 04:20 PM
Apr 2024

Averages 2 to 3% with some categories up to 18%.

https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/tariff_profiles/US_e.pdf

And no, I don't see the difference between "everything" and "steel". Steel goes into a vast number of industrial and consumer products.

ProfessorGAC

(76,695 posts)
10. Utterly Clueless
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:39 PM
Apr 2024

A 10% or more tariff won't raise prices because the exporter will just eat it? That shows an utter lack of how companies that actually make stuff operate. That's immensely dumb.

Torchlight

(6,824 posts)
22. "Because the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was soooo successful."
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 04:04 PM
Apr 2024

He wrote with his eyes rolling so loudly, they could be heard in Versailles.

walkingman

(10,862 posts)
27. Wonder what the Tea Partiers will think about this? After all it will mean
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 05:03 PM
Apr 2024

propping up the various businesses like he had to do with the Agriculture sector last time? And it has to be inflationary?

sop

(18,614 posts)
28. Trumponomics
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 05:11 PM
Apr 2024

Don't think this will get him nominated for the "Noble Prize" in economics.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump considering a 10% t...