Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Trump's rhetoric about 'paid agitators' sounds so familiar
Donald Trump dismissed Columbia University protesters as paid agitators. If the Republican's rhetoric sounded familiar, it wasn't your imagination.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-rhetoric-paid-agitators-sounds-familiar-rcna150202
Conditions at Columbia University took a turn overnight as school officials called in the NYPD, which began arresting those protesting the Israel/Hamas war. As events unfolded, Donald Trump apparently thought itd be a good idea to call into Sean Hannitys Fox News program and share an accusation. The Hill reported:
I really think you have a lot of paid agitators, professional agitators in here too, and I see it all over, the former president said, claiming activism experience he does not have. You know, when you see signs and theyre all identical. That means theyre being paid by a source......
After the GOP candidate prevailed on Election Day 2016, there was related anti-Trump activism. Those involved, he said in November 2016, were paid protesters.
Months later, after the Republicans inauguration, the activism continued. Trump assured the public once more that these Americans deserved to be ignored because he assumed they were paid protesters.
The following year, Brett Kavanaughs Supreme Court nomination inspired another round of progressive activism. The protesters, Trump insisted, were paid professionals. (He also made claims about the quality of the protesters signs, just as he did on Fox last night.)
Now, the presumptive GOP nominee has returned to the same idea in order to dismiss campus protests.
When right-wing activists engage in activism, the Republican assumes theyre very fine people and patriots. When those Trump doesnt like gather for protests he disapproves of, he assumes theyre paid agitators whose sincerity is inherently suspect.
Former President Trump made unfounded claims Tuesday that pro-Palestine protests at Columbia University contained paid agitators as nationwide college campus protests escalate. ... Trump claimed in a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity during the police operation that many of the protesters did not believe in what they were protesting for.
I really think you have a lot of paid agitators, professional agitators in here too, and I see it all over, the former president said, claiming activism experience he does not have. You know, when you see signs and theyre all identical. That means theyre being paid by a source......
After the GOP candidate prevailed on Election Day 2016, there was related anti-Trump activism. Those involved, he said in November 2016, were paid protesters.
Months later, after the Republicans inauguration, the activism continued. Trump assured the public once more that these Americans deserved to be ignored because he assumed they were paid protesters.
The following year, Brett Kavanaughs Supreme Court nomination inspired another round of progressive activism. The protesters, Trump insisted, were paid professionals. (He also made claims about the quality of the protesters signs, just as he did on Fox last night.)
Now, the presumptive GOP nominee has returned to the same idea in order to dismiss campus protests.
When right-wing activists engage in activism, the Republican assumes theyre very fine people and patriots. When those Trump doesnt like gather for protests he disapproves of, he assumes theyre paid agitators whose sincerity is inherently suspect.
TFG cannot accept the concept that people acting in good faith could disagree with him and so any such person has to be a paid protestor
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 397 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Why Trump's rhetoric about 'paid agitators' sounds so familiar (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
May 1
OP
jls4561
(1,305 posts)1. When I hear "paid agitators", the first name that comes to mind is Roger Stone.
0rganism
(24,083 posts)2. Because he pays people to attend his own rallies
The notion that some people act from sincere conviction is, to him, incomprehensible. Of course he knows many of his followers are sincere but that's different. Somehow. Equally incomprehensible, but necessary and sympathetic. Therefore, all the unnecessary people who don't deserve sympathy are obviously getting paid for their efforts. Another victory for logic!
Diraven
(600 posts)3. More projection
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,723 posts)4. That rhetoric is coming from inside the house