Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeter Baker (NYT) and his smug son are FEUDING with Hakeem Jefferson
I believe Peter's and Susan Glasser's (The New Yorker) son Theo was the one who got the Stanford U. President to resign. So he's become quite arrogant.
Anyway . . . Theo sent emails to Hakeem Jeffries and then freaked out on Twitter when he was called out on it and deleted his tweets.
Good thing someone got screencaps.
austerity is theft 🇿🇦
@wideofthepost
the level of uninhibited entitlement of this kid is so embarrassing
@wideofthepost
the level of uninhibited entitlement of this kid is so embarrassing
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Eric Blair🔥🟧
@protecttruth_
·
With Theo Baker saying Hakeem Jefferson doesnt understand the true nature of journalistic objectivity, since objectivity means being able to call Trump a liar, worth remembering Peter Baker saying that objectivity means *not* ever calling Trump a liar.
@hakeemjefferson
You may find this useful:
I never make up my mind, even in the privacy of the kitchen that one candidate is better than another, that one side is right and the other wrong.
Indeed, Peter Baker thinks objectivity means never saying Trump is wrong.
We shouldnt criticize people for their parents actions. But here Theo was defending his fathers actions; the critique is of what Theo said.
Eric Blair🔥🟧
@protecttruth_
Theo is not his dad. But here he is defending his dad from an accusation of false objectivity, so I think this particular quote is quite relevant.
Thanks for standing up for whats right here.
@protecttruth_
·
With Theo Baker saying Hakeem Jefferson doesnt understand the true nature of journalistic objectivity, since objectivity means being able to call Trump a liar, worth remembering Peter Baker saying that objectivity means *not* ever calling Trump a liar.
@hakeemjefferson
You may find this useful:
I never make up my mind, even in the privacy of the kitchen that one candidate is better than another, that one side is right and the other wrong.
Indeed, Peter Baker thinks objectivity means never saying Trump is wrong.
We shouldnt criticize people for their parents actions. But here Theo was defending his fathers actions; the critique is of what Theo said.
Eric Blair🔥🟧
@protecttruth_
Theo is not his dad. But here he is defending his dad from an accusation of false objectivity, so I think this particular quote is quite relevant.
Thanks for standing up for whats right here.
Link to tweet
Jazmín Flores
@jazmin0809
The way Theo Baker, son of @peterbakernyt
, deleted all those condescending tweets 🤣🤣🤣
The entitlement reeks to the high heavens.
Link to tweet
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peter Baker (NYT) and his smug son are FEUDING with Hakeem Jefferson (Original Post)
FelineOverlord
May 2024
OP
Prof. Hakeem Jefferson, not Rep. Hakeem Jeffries. Either way, it's a shitty look.
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2024
#5
So can we move on to: who is Hakeem Jefferson and why should we care about an argument he had?
brooklynite
May 2024
#12
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)1. Nepo baby
David Austin Walsh
@DavidAstinWalsh
·
Hey remember when THE ATLANTIC ran a cover story by Peter Bakers kid a month ago about how his pro-Palestinian classmates at Stanford are all a bunch of antisemites? Because Peter Baker doesnt seem to remember.
David Austin Walsh
@DavidAstinWalsh
Also seems relevant that Theo Baker is publicly feuding with a Stanford professor over criticism of his dads tweet.
@DavidAstinWalsh
Also seems relevant that Theo Baker is publicly feuding with a Stanford professor over criticism of his dads tweet.
Link to tweet
cilla4progress
(26,514 posts)11. Zackly.
Nothing worse.
The list is long.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,683 posts)2. I am so glad that I canceled by NYT subscription back in 2015
DaBronx
(758 posts)3. FIX YOUR POST - Wrong Hakeem: Jefferson not Jeffries
chowder66
(11,990 posts)4. Please update your post. This is Hakeem Jefferson not Hakeem Jeffries.
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)6. Sorry about that. I should always check autocorrects 🫢
Sorry
mahina
(20,516 posts)10. Please fix in the text too
chowder66
(11,990 posts)9. Thank you!!
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,656 posts)5. Prof. Hakeem Jefferson, not Rep. Hakeem Jeffries. Either way, it's a shitty look.
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)7. I fixed the autocorrect
Thanks.
Theo seems to struggle against Stanford staff.
Prairie Gates
(7,543 posts)8. You left the autocorrect that appeared in the text body, though
It's also weird since most people don't know who this Hakeem Jefferson is?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)12. So can we move on to: who is Hakeem Jefferson and why should we care about an argument he had?
