General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas finds new way to punish and humiliate anyone who tries to get an abortion
For anyone who might ever become pregnant in Texas, the consequences of Republican governance could soon hit home in an extremely unpleasant way.
A Texas court is poised to allow a man who impregnated his former girlfriend the right to compel her deposition to seek money damages from out-of-state abortion providers that helped terminate her pregnancy. If allowed to proceed, anyone who becomes pregnant in the state of Texas and takes steps to end that pregnancywhether by using pills obtained through the mail, or by traveling out of statecould be effectively stalked and forced into court by their sexual partner to explain their actions.
Just let that sink in for a moment.
Practically speaking, it means that sexual encounters and sexual relationships in Texas are now fraught with the potential expense and embarrassment of being dragged into court, should someone become pregnant and later decidefor whatever reasonto end their pregnancy. And because the primary motivation for forcing a sexual partner to go to court is the promise of a large award of money, this practice, if approved by the court, is likely to become pervasive throughout Texas.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/5/7/2239233/-Texas-finds-new-way-to-punish-and-humiliate-anyone-who-tries-to-get-an-abortion
hlthe2b
(113,212 posts)others from out-of-state subpoenas. Several other states have these shield laws too.
So, go to hell, greedy, controlling Texas monster and stay there. No $10,000 for you. No harassment of Coloradoans for your nasty gains.
LeftInTX
(34,031 posts)He may still win his stupid case even without records. I just assumed that he would not have a right to the records and was basing his case on text messages or something...
Hekate
(100,133 posts)
and send the info back to Texas and other red states.
No border checks or anything like that. Just drive by the clinics and take photos
Source Los Angeles Times a couple of weeks ago
hlthe2b
(113,212 posts)They will fight it. But even with a criminally corrupt SCOTUS, I feel confident CO's shield law will prevail.
There is not much that can protect the patient if she goes back to Texas--thus the rogue cops and their license plate reporting can impact her and those who drove her, but CO providers are shielded from providing medical info needed.
Fla Dem
(27,489 posts)Does he even have a say as to whether or not she should carry the child to term? If he does, why should his position carry more weight than the woman's?
Irish_Dem
(80,419 posts)Their bodies belong to men.
calimary
(89,299 posts)How bout those voting rights that the little woman surely doesnt need? Just something else to bother her pretty little head about (when she SHOULD be cleaning the house and fixing hubbys dinner).
I am SOOOOOO hating this!!!
Irish_Dem
(80,419 posts)Can't get an education or hold a job when you are always pregnant and have a house
full of kids, you can't get out of the house any way.
Might as well just take away the vote and make it official.
Lonestarblue
(13,344 posts)MagickMuffin
(18,219 posts)I sure wouldnt want to have sex with these cretins. Especially nowadays.
lindysalsagal
(22,841 posts)Who will start the "boycott."
MuseRider
(35,166 posts)and at this point I doubt that would be considered against the law.
Demobrat
(10,270 posts)Texas women should cut off the men I cringe. Because Im not sure its a matter of choice.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)Every kids adds over $150K to local taxes spread over an 18-year period. Tens of thousands of extra births every year, above current stasis will bankrupt Texas in a decade.
Since this targets poor people more than wealthy ones, that means other supplemental services are needed that will boost those state & local taxes even more.
NanaCat
(2,332 posts)To build and maintain orphanages.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)intheflow
(30,080 posts)Unless the pregnant person is wealthy to begin with, they can't get bupkis.
Ping Tung
(4,230 posts)And "...seek money damages from other states.." sounds an awful lot like bounties placed on women who dared to cross the border from Texas which looks at anyone who aids the runaways as rustlers.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
kingvitamin This message was self-deleted by its author.
orwell
(8,003 posts)...Lysistrata solution is called for in TexAss.
mtngirl47
(1,224 posts)(I just didn't know that word!)
Warpy
(114,505 posts)"He pissed and moaned about wearing a condom, then took it off halfway through. Then he said he didn't want to be trapped by a kid and ran out on me completely. I"m not paid enough to afford a baby and I'm not giving my baby up to strangers. That's the explanation."
Sounds about right, doesn't it?
Or, alternatively, "I'm twenty two. My parents were (religion) and married me off at fifteen. I have six kids now I can barely keep track of, three of them in diapers. I am completely exhausted. Another baby will drive me to suicide. That's the explanation."
Or haw about "I made straight As in high school, got scholarships to college. I"m the first one of my family to go to college, and I've got a 4.0 average. I got raped in a stairwell of the student union, and I'm faced with losing everything I worked so hard for. That's the explanation."
I hope women DO explain, not that stupid men blinded by man's religions will ever listen. Everybody else will, and that's who will change things, even in Texas.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Crunchy Frog
(28,220 posts)Who'd want to take the risk with those sorts of potential consequences?
catbyte
(38,843 posts)There's no DNA to test. Sounds like a bullshit intimidation move to me and almost impossible to prove in court unless there had been a prenatal DNA test. What am I missing?
AZ8theist
(7,151 posts)At the first prelim, she should say "You're not the father. I hooked up with some other guy after we broke up".
Or, "I was cheating on you for months before we broke up".....
Burn his stupid little incel ass...........
Demobrat
(10,270 posts)How do I know its mine? are over. Now weve moved on to Prove it was yours.
lastlib
(27,792 posts)With all this crap going on, what woman in these red states would want to risk pregnancy? You can't fault them, but it's high time to put a stop to this kind of crap.
bucolic_frolic
(54,497 posts)SARose
(1,831 posts)The Conservative Who Wants to Bring Down the Supreme Court
The lawyer who wrote Texass abortion ban has a bigger projectdisempowering the judiciarythat may appeal to liberals, too.
By Jeannie Suk Gersen
January 5, 2023
On the day that the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, the lawyer Jonathan Mitchell was at the National Association of Christian Lawmakers conference, where he was to receive an award for having enabled the most successful pro-life legislation to date. Mitchell was the author of the legislation that had effectively ended abortion accessfirst in Texas and then in Oklahomawhile Roe was still good law. As news broke at the conference that Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization had come down, people were crying, men and women both, Mitchell said. I think they really thought there was divine intervention. But Mitchell felt something different from the joy all around him about saving unborn babies. He was awash in relief that the Court as an institution might be able to redeem itself in a legal sense. He kept his feelings to himself. I didnt want to put a damper on things, because everybody else was just, Praise Jesus.
Unlike most lawyers and legal scholars who profess to be committed to the rule of law, Mitchell does not find it disturbing that several states, following his advice, managed to nullify a constitutional right long before the Supreme Court did. That is because his mission is to undermine the Court itself as the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution. He first laid out his arguments in several law-review articles, one of which proposed that legislatures could overcome federal-court rulings they oppose by drafting statutes that insulate them from judicial review. He then put his arguments into practice, using abortion as the perfect test case.
Snip
More
Long article but worth the read. My spidey sense is tingling. I wont be surprised if/when someone digs up dirt on him. Jest my 2 cents..
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)JoseBalow
(9,302 posts)flashman13
(2,221 posts)I think (and hope) the women of Texas give the Rs a serious kick in the ass. Ridding the senate of Cruz would be a good start.
Upthevibe
(10,108 posts)Lovie777
(22,279 posts)mail order, throwing tons of money to foreign countries still won't help them.
NickB79
(20,280 posts)Tell the court, and the world, how his tiny penis couldn't satisfy any woman, and she had an affair with another man, which you believe was the real source of the pregnancy. No DNA to prove her wrong. Absolutely emasculate him in front of his peers.
Initech
(107,985 posts)But please, keep calling yourselves "pro life", assholes.
Xolodno
(7,319 posts)And an increase of sales of vibrators, dongs, etc.
Maybe Texas should have another moniker, "the whack off state".
