General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShock Doctrine (Naomi Klein) If you have not read it. You need to.
What right-wing governments are doing is manufacturing crisis and creating a pretext for even greater austerity. The shredding of the safety net, the erosion of institutional expertise, the destruction of natural capital: it's all part of a systematic effort to privatise what is left of commons and turn us all into serfs dependent on hostile overlords.
This is the shock doctrine. Make things bad intentionally and then say There Is No Alternative
https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens/112146643576723465
MOMFUDSKI
(6,428 posts)years ago. Thanks
onecaliberal
(33,448 posts)Going to read again.
alwaysinasnit
(5,101 posts)ProfessorPlum
(11,291 posts)and how cruelty is perpetrated in it. And possibly, how to stop/survive it.
JustAnotherGen
(32,362 posts)By Ari Berman.
A must read for every single person who intends to vote third party or or sit out of the election.
We cannot reach Republicans who are wed to Trump. Not going to happen.
But the protesters in support of Gaza? They need to read this book. Their lives depend on it.
Marcus IM
(2,489 posts)2naSalit
(88,058 posts)I have been advocating that more people read the book so they can see what's going on now and where it came from.
onecaliberal
(33,448 posts)erronis
(15,855 posts)RandomNumbers
(17,732 posts)Israeli brutal retaliation (depressingly predictable given Netanyahu).
Wounded Bear
(59,093 posts)Sure, corporations and politicians take advantage of natural disasters all the time. Huge opportunities for the unscrupulous to cash in on other people's woes.
But, politicians especially will create crises where there didn't need to be one, just to propagandize and take advantage of "popular" anger over situations, and with the RW these days having such big and so many megaphones in the media and social plaftorms, its easy to create the anger and dissatisfaction that they thrive on.
peppertree
(22,116 posts)Argentina was chosen because it's a) irrelevant; and b) geographically, climatologically, ethnically, culturally and (albeit far less advanced) economically similar to the U.S.
As much as a marginal, far-away country could be anyway.
Moreover, they have a predatory, self-hating and (of course) fascist-leaning elite that will gladly go along - so long as their freedom to stash everything away in the U.S. or Caribbean is guaranteed (which is where the IMF comes in, to finance said offshoring).
Perfect setting for a large-scale socio-economic experiment in just how quickly you can wreck a country without people, and what's left of the institutions, realizing what's actually happening - and getting in the way.
But because the experiment is always interrupted (the Argentines they pick to inflict these things are mostly idiots), they have to keep coming back to try again.
And are they ever!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/111698027
Haggard Celine
(16,900 posts)All of the shady real estate acquisitions going on after Katrina was enough to make me sick. Speculators picked up properties for much less than they were worth so they could turn around and sell them to casinos for much more. Those are the kinds of people who move in when there's any kind of war or disaster. Modern day carpetbaggers.
Auggie
(31,351 posts)I pass along the warnings of the manufactured crisis synopsis every change I get.