General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ seeks 40 years for the man who broke into Nancy Pelosi's home
Link to tweet
@kyledcheney
BREAKING: DOJ seeks *40 years* for the man who broke into Nancy Pelosi's home, sought to kidnap her and assaulted her husband. They want the court to label his crime an act of terrorism.
mcar
(45,813 posts)MagickMuffin
(18,220 posts)Unfortunately, it wasnt an act. This was real terrorism. Poor Paul woke up from sleep to be attacked in the head with a hammer by a deranged terrorist.
How about labeling it as domestic terrorism?
kacekwl
(8,990 posts)given the state of law in America. 40 to 50 sounds about right.
Auggie
(32,989 posts)They wont be lenient
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Not every judge in America (ESPECIALLY in the 9th Circuit) is a Trump wannabe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_circuit_judges#Judges_of_the_Ninth_Circuit
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)lpbk2713
(43,255 posts)Among other things. Put him away.
MagickMuffin
(18,220 posts)Unfortunately, it wasnt an act. This was real terrorism. Poor Paul woke up from sleep to be attacked in the head with a hammer by a deranged terrorist.
How about labeling it as domestic terrorism?
slightlv
(7,583 posts)Those two words terrify politicians of all stripes, it seems. But we're never going to be able to do anything about it until we start calling it what it is!
And I'd vote for closer to 50 years for this guy. Not only was he not even involved with government, but he's a senior citizen. I'd think you could place this under a hate crime, as well, against the elderly.
soldierant
(9,304 posts)In this case it is used in a legal sence meaning a thing someone did. And it was indeed an act od terrorism.
ShazzieB
(22,346 posts)It means that what he did was terrorism.
chouchou
(2,935 posts)Has he had a psych evaluation?
I only say this, is because there are people who are extremely mentally unstable and have never been diagnosed.
There's mean, cruel monsters and there's people who have brains that are horrible....and not their fault.
NJCher
(42,769 posts)In some of the states where I've worked with people who were convicted, there is a complete workup of evaluations, profiles, etc., of the person and it all goes into a huge book with other information on the case.
However, I recall reading an article about this guy and it was one of those cases where he got sucked into the propaganda web they've so extensively created in this country.
chouchou
(2,935 posts)wnylib
(25,355 posts)but he was determined, strong-willed, and defiant. He struck the blow after police arrived. Right in front of police, when told to let go of his weapon, he struck Paul Pelosi. It's like saying, "No. I came to injure and I will."
Angry that Nancy was not there. Angry that police were there. So, do as much harm as possible, quickly, before police could stop him.
I'd give the SOB life without parole. He's too dangerous to ever be free.
SarahD
(1,732 posts)I don't see that, but it was kidnapping, assault, maybe attempted murder. That should add up to more than a week.
wnylib
(25,355 posts)SarahD
(1,732 posts)I remember he said and did things that would make it difficult to establish his exact motivation.
Montauk6
(9,331 posts)Upthevibe
(10,108 posts)Good!
NBachers
(19,281 posts)area51
(12,590 posts)Just throw away the key.
