General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Kagan eviscerates that fucking fascist Alito in her dissent in the SC gerrymandering decision.
This is a thing of fucking beauty. Eat a bag of rancid dicks, fuckface insurrectionist.
"But as with its upside-down application of clear-error review, the majority is intent on changing the usual rules when it comes to addressing racial-gerrymandering claims," Kagan added.

brer cat
(27,625 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)hlthe2b
(114,201 posts)with only slightly less impassioned feelings for ACB and Roberts, but KARMA CANNOT COME QUICKLY ENOUGH.
malaise
(296,913 posts)That is all
MOMFUDSKI
(7,080 posts)the SC daily. Make them squirm and want to quit. No rest for the wicked
Aviation Pro
(15,653 posts)Better option would be to go after their sponsors by taking their money.
bucolic_frolic
(55,437 posts)Aviation Pro
(15,653 posts)....
tavernier
(14,465 posts)magicarpet
(18,931 posts)druidity33
(6,927 posts)ChazInAz
(3,020 posts)Looks like a fluffy grey cat.
I believe it's thinking judgmental thoughts about Alito. As grey cats will do.
BlueKota
(5,442 posts)not a real one.
ChazInAz
(3,020 posts)I saw it on my tablet's small screen.
It's still probably thinking judgmental thinks.
Blue Owl
(59,332 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)The Subversive 6 want a white christofascist nation and will do what it takes to create it.
In It to Win It
(12,669 posts)Cooper v. Harris is a redistricting case out of North Carolina that the Supreme Court decided in 2017, similar to this case, and the Court struck down the map.
Justice Kagan wrote the majority in that case, and Alito says that her dissent in this South Carolina case based on an "imaginary version" of that 2017 opinion... again, an "imaginary version" of an opinion that Justice Kagan herself wrote.
Alito effectively guts the Cooper v Harris precedent, and then claims the author of that precedent, Justice Kagan, is misreading Cooper v Harris.
surfered
(13,803 posts)lefthandedskyhook
(1,181 posts)Alito has never been a reasonable human being. Alito is subhuman and Machiavellian. Thomas is worse. Chumps appointees just make it all much more dismal. The court is broken and everyone knows
dalton99a
(94,736 posts)LudwigPastorius
(14,840 posts)spanone
(141,846 posts)Wild blueberry
(8,331 posts)Thank you.
LastDemocratInSC
(4,243 posts)ShazzieB
(22,721 posts)dweller
(28,506 posts)Similar purpose to a gargoyle
✌🏻
hunter
(40,769 posts)... how bizarre is that?
Alice Kramden
(2,954 posts)Martin68
(27,924 posts)grossly unethical behavior and partisan application of the law. It will be interesting to see if this is the beginning of a major change in relations on the court. Roberts needs to step up and enforce ethical standards being freely violated by Alito and Thomas.