Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pototan

(3,132 posts)
Tue May 28, 2024, 09:24 AM May 2024

Trump trial question

According to the legal talking heads on cable news, the defense will bring up the fact that the prosecution did not call to the witness stand Alan Weisselberg. This is to cast doubt on Michel Cohen's account of the meeting between Cohen, Weisselberg and Trump.

Here's my question. If the defense opens the door to this issue, can the prosecution in its closing argument refer to the NDA that the Trump organization has with Weisselberg prohibiting him from cooperating with any investigation and can the Prosecution also say that Weisselberg is currently in prison for lying to a court in favor of Trump?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump trial question (Original Post) Pototan May 2024 OP
Answer: no. brooklynite May 2024 #1
Isn't it too late for that? Presumably if TFS gets convicted it could come up for review in appeals but flying_wahini May 2024 #2
The missing witness issue is covered well here.... getagrip_already May 2024 #3

flying_wahini

(8,275 posts)
2. Isn't it too late for that? Presumably if TFS gets convicted it could come up for review in appeals but
Tue May 28, 2024, 09:42 AM
May 2024

My guess the judge would cast it aside. IMO- Not an Attny.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump trial question