General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAndrew Weissmann has a good point on jury request
Just now on MSNBC, he said to the effect: The defense said during closing that during the Trump Tower meeting, no discussion of catch and kill at the meeting. There were two Trump Tower meetings in Jan 2017. The one where Pecker was in attendance, on Jan 6, 2017, Trump thanked Pecker for killing the stories about McDougal and the doorman. Weissmann said the defense closing argument statement about catch and kill probably caused the jurys request. And it will backfire on the defense since Trump used the word kill, it makes the defense seem like they were using weasel words to fool the jury.
Response to Mr.WeRP (Original post)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
NoRethugFriends
(3,752 posts)orangecrush
(30,257 posts)NanaCat
(2,332 posts)She denied her 'patients' palliative care when they were dying in pain, because she got off to their suffering. But when she was sick, it was getting on a private plane to get state-of-the-art care.
She was EVIL INCARNATE, and anybody who calls her a good person is as evil as she was.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)I am in 110% agreement with you.
You may catch some "blow back" for your honesty, but rest assured that you are not alone in your feelings.
duckworth969
(1,349 posts)Hitchens had a great documentary about that very issue.
underpants
(196,495 posts)Last edited Wed May 29, 2024, 05:59 PM - Edit history (1)
Maybe they are walking through the case in order. Maybe Pecker pretty much sealed it earlier with what is the foundation of the case. Thats what it seemed to me and Ive heard lots of commentators say the same.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)He wasn't sure and went back to recheck it.
Bev54
(13,431 posts)the words catch and kill in their meetings but the discussions they had, were exactly about that, even though the words were not said.
[/img][/url]