Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:05 AM Nov 2012

Bowles & Simpson get $40K every time they tell America it can't afford Social Security.

Every time Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson talk about how the United States simply cannot afford to offer their citizens a modest income in retirement, they get $40,000.

This is three times the amount that Social Security recipients actually get themselves in retirement, ANNUALLY. Bowles and Simpson get that for an hourlong talk...

Alan Simpson, by the way, gets a fat government pension in honor of his service in the Senate, as well as government-provided health care. I don’t begrudge him it. Everyone should have the access to such benefits.

But there’s a certain insidiousness to these two very well-off people getting up and railing against how social insurance programs bankrupt the country, and walking away with three times the amount that any senior citizen gets as their Social Security benefit in A YEAR.

We need more exposes on speaking fees. It really is the unseen currency of the elites.

http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/11/28/bowles-and-simpson-rake-in-40000-per-speaking-engagement

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bowles & Simpson get $40K every time they tell America it can't afford Social Security. (Original Post) HiPointDem Nov 2012 OP
I don't begrudge them their pensions either...... CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2012 #1
It's a disgrace that Bush appointed these two to lead the charge on reforming government MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #2
Obama appointed them Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #3
Seriously? MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #4
It was his commission after he got in office Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #5
I was being sarcastic MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #6
bush figured he needed no commission to tell him how to fuck up this country Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #8
lol HiPointDem Nov 2012 #9
I wouldn't give either one of em forty cents for that crappy report they produced. Tutonic Nov 2012 #7
Yes ReRe Nov 2012 #10
Absolutely ReRe Nov 2012 #11
^ Wilms Nov 2012 #12

CaliforniaPeggy

(156,928 posts)
1. I don't begrudge them their pensions either......
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:08 AM
Nov 2012

But these speaking fees on top of that?

That is obscene.

Especially when you consider what they're talking about!

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
2. It's a disgrace that Bush appointed these two to lead the charge on reforming government
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:10 AM
Nov 2012

He knew exactly what they'd come up with.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
6. I was being sarcastic
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:31 AM
Nov 2012

But being too dry.

I was trying to make the point htat those two would have been Bush's pick if he had appointed this infernal commision.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
8. bush figured he needed no commission to tell him how to fuck up this country
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:39 AM
Nov 2012

because he had cheney and all the old republican guard

Tutonic

(2,522 posts)
7. I wouldn't give either one of em forty cents for that crappy report they produced.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:38 AM
Nov 2012

Is insanity running rampant in the land?

ReRe

(12,189 posts)
11. Absolutely
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 04:55 AM
Nov 2012
We do need more exposes on speaking fees. Follow the yellow brick money trail road....
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bowles & Simpson get ...