General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Sad Day for Free Speech': Media Matters Layoffs Follow 'Thermonuclear' Attack by Elon Musk
"This is how free speech is actually chilledvengeful dipshit billionaires," said one media executive, after more than a dozen staffers let go from nonprofit watchdog whose mission is to combat right-wing disinformation and propaganda.https://www.commondreams.org/news/elon-musk-media-matters-suit

Just months after mega-billionaire Elon Musk launched what he termed a "thermonuclear lawsuit" against Media Matters for America, the nonprofit media watchdog outfit announced a round of punishing layoffs Thursday which it in part attributed to the financial strain imposed by the legal battle it now faces. What triggered Musk's initial outrage in November was MMFA reporting about "pro-Nazi content" on the social media platform X, owned by Musk, appearing alongside ads by prominent corporations in the content stream shown to users. In his post threatening the lawsuit, which was later filed in Texas, Musk vowed to target "Media Matters and ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company." Noting the scope of his retribution, Musk then added: "Their board, their donors, their network of dark money, all of them " would be included in the suit's scope.
Link to tweet

In the organization's Thursday announcement of layoffs, Media Matters' president Angelo Carusone said: "We're confronting a legal assault on multiple fronts and given how rapidly the media landscape is shifting, we need to be extremely intentional about how we allocate resources in order to stay effective. Nobody does what Media Matters does." Due to the pressures, Carusone explained, the group was "taking this action now to ensure that we are sustainable, sturdy and successful for whatever lies ahead." More than a dozen staffers, including researchers and digital producers, were among those terminated. "Many of my best colleagues at Media Matters lost their jobs today," Ari Drennen, the LGBTQ program director for Media Matters, said Thursday on X alongside individual posts from many of those laid off. "However you feel about our work, it should worry you that any billionaire could do this to any outlet at any time for any reason. It's a sad day for free speech."
Link to tweet
Media Matters for America (MMFA) is a 501(c)3 registered nonprofitwhich describes itself as a "progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media"founded in 2004 at the height of the George W. Bush administration. Ever since it has targeted the right-wing media echo chamber, including Fox News and other prominent cable, newspaper, and radio broadcasters who coordinate the messaging of pro-corporate and reactionary forces within the Republican Party and beyond. In a post on X shared Thursday afternoon, laid-off Media Matters journalist Kat Abughazaleh lamented the firing of her talented colleagues (and encouraged outlets that are hiring to consider them) as she also directed her ire at Musk for his possible role in the downsizing decision. "There's a reason far-right billionaires attack Media Matters with armies of lawyers," said Abughazaleh. "They know how effective our work is, and it terrifies them (him)," with the parenthetical a seeming reference to Musk.
Link to tweet
Responding to her message on the social media platform now owned by Musk, media executive Ben Collins, current CEO of the satirical website The Onion, doubled-down on the charge against the Tesla founder and on-again-off-again world's richest man. "Fuck Elon Musk," Collins said. "This is why right-wing billionaires sue people reporting on them," continued Collins, who previously worked as a reporter for NBC News covering, among other thing, right-wing disinformation. "They know they can't win these lawsuits. But they also know legal fees will cripple the little guy reporting on their lies and crimes. This is how free speech is actually chilledvengeful dipshit billionaires." Musk has championed himself as a devote "free speech absolutist," but his time at the helm of X, which was Twitter when he purchased it, has repeatedly exposed the limits of his commitment.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
snip
SoFlaBro
(3,790 posts)Eko
(9,993 posts)I dropped $50 to them.
Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)stating "he did it himself".
Now destroying things due to not knowing how to create.
So familiar.
KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)After all, all they were reporting on was true facts.
unblock
(56,198 posts)He just seems to be saying he has visibility into more data and was able to determine that media matters' experience was atypical.
But how could media matters know that, they don't have access to the whole database, all they can go on is their own user experience.
Not sure what the legal argument here is.
Shipwack
(3,062 posts)Eugene
(67,100 posts)and then did "tortious interference with existing contracts" by scaring advertisers off Xhitter.
Xhitter assured advertisers that their ads would not sponsor Nazi content,
and they now assert that Media Matters used atypical means to make
that protection fail.
It needs to be pointed out that the Media Matters revelations coincided
with Emerald Boy going full mask off with his own personal racism.
Several advertisers cite the reputational risks associated with
Musk's public embrace of replacement theory.
maximize the likelihood that the platform would pair prominent advertisers content with
antisemitic posts, and then scrolled through an exceptionally large amount of content to induce the
desired pairing. Id. ¶¶ 47-54. Then, on November 16, 2023, it maliciously published a false,
defamatory, and misleading article claiming that X was responsible for antisemitic and hateful
content being paired with advertisers posts. Id. ¶ 46. This article asserted that Xs platform
displayed prominent advertisers paid content alongside antisemitic and other highly unsavory user
content, falsely and maliciously depicting these results as representative of the typical user
experience on the X platform.
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/X-v-Media-Matters-Response-to-Motion-to-Dismiss-3-29-2024.pdf
Therefore, it is the fault of the Big Bad Media Matters that Xhitter is now worth
far less than what Musk paid for it.
brush
(61,033 posts)which allows allows our long-time enemy an advantage against Ukraine, an ally who we support in their war against Russia.
That IMO is treason-adjacent...giving aid and comfort to an enemy while at war. We are not quite at war with Russia which is why I wrote treason-adjacent.
The miserable fucker is allowed to get away with such near treason only because of his money. Media outlets are afraid to publicize his near treason because they could be in "Media Matter's" shoes.
The MFer is just about commiting treason.
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Ugh
byronius
(7,973 posts)Hell come to justice sooner or later.
Hopefully sooner.
Shipwack
(3,062 posts)Doesn't that picture of Musk in the tux look like you told ChatGPT to make a picture of Pepe the frog as a Bond Villain?
Old Crank
(7,058 posts)Bow to the billionaires or be wiped out legally because you don't have the resources to defend yourself.
Tax these guys on earnings and wealth.
Lonestarblue
(13,470 posts)He fits perfectly with their desire to burn down democracy.
SupportSanity
(1,582 posts)Not sure how I can support them when billionaires can take them down.
Very sad to see Musk destroy a good thing.
It looks like the only way I can support them is at the voting booth.
Emrys
(9,099 posts)He's had mixed results in the past.
Here's a case where he was the one who tried crying "SLAPP":
Elon Musk said a critic's defamation lawsuit was an attempt to censor and intimidate him. An appellate panel disagreed.
https://www.courthousenews.com/elon-musk-loses-another-round-with-tesla-critic/
And to prove that he's consistent in his hypocrisy, he's just failed to successfully invoke SLAPP in another case:
https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-lawyers-face-defeat-trying-dismiss-defamation-suit-1906229
The boot was on the other foot for this recent one, which has similarities to the Media Matters case:
Center for Countering Digital Hate has chronicled rise of racist, antisemitic and extremist content on X since Musks acquisition
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/25/elon-musk-hate-speech-lawsuit
That was in California. Musk's suing Media Matters in a Texas federal court to avoid the anti-SLAPP laws - and, if a number of legal experts are to be believed, because his case is weak, a suspicion bolstered by the fact he's engaged small law firms with no particular expertise in the areas of law under contention:
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/21/tech/elon-musk-texas-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html
Benjamin Edwards, a law professor, writing in The Hill last year wasn't impressed either:
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4324303-musks-media-matters-misstep/
Nor was Ars Technica a month or so ago:
Musks attempt to venue-shop Media Matters lawsuit is not likely to end well.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/elon-musks-x-scrambles-to-keep-court-case-against-media-matters-in-texas/
Of course, for the SLAPP tactic to be successful, he doesn't have to win. Just bankrupt people,