General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas professors sue to fail students who seek abortions
Texas professors sue to fail students who seek abortionsMen are using abortion bans to control and abuse women in their lives for "consensual sexual intercourse"
By AMANDA MARCOTTE
Senior Writer
PUBLISHED JUNE 3, 2024 5:45AM (EDT)
(Salon) A pair of Texas professors figured out that their female students have sex and, boy, they do not like it. So now the philosophy professor and finance professor are suing for the right to punish their students who, outside of class, have abortions.
"Pregnancy is not a disease, and elective abortions are not 'health care,'" University of Texas at Austin professor Daniel Bonevac sneers in a federal court filing with professor John Hatfield. Instead, Bonevac writes, because pregnancy is the result of "voluntary and consensual sexual intercourse," students should not be allowed time off to get abortions. If the students disobey and miss class for abortion care, the filing continues, the professors should be allowed to flunk students. Additionally, Bonevac asserts that he has a right to refuse to employ a teaching assistant who has had an abortion, calling such women "criminals."
....(snip)....
Even though the plaintiffs suing for the right to flunk female students for abortion include boilerplate arguments in which they feign concern that abortion is "killing," the legal filing makes it clear that what really outrages Bonevac and Hatfield is that Title IX prevents them from controlling the private lives of students. Along with their anger about abortion, they grouse about not being allowed to punish students "for being homosexual or transgender." They also argue they should be able to penalize teaching assistants for "cross-dressing," by which they appear to mean allowing trans women to wear skirts.
....(snip)....
Even though Bonevac and Hatfield work in Austin, Texas, they filed their lawsuit 486 miles away in Amarillo, Texas. The reason for this is not mysterious: Donald Trump-appointed judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. The right-wing judge has a long and frankly unhinged history of screeching at top volume about the evils of "sexual revolutionaries." (Yes, that does sound like a compliment, but he doesn't mean it as such.) It takes very little to draw Kacsmaryk's sexualized condemnation. Premarital sex, for instance, makes one a "sexual revolutionary." Using contraception within marriage also makes one an irredeemable pervert. In his legal writings, Kacsmaryk is very clear that sex is only for procreation within marriage, and anything outside of that should draw legal sanction. He has not weighed in on whether there should be restrictions on what sexual positions are legally permissible within the procreation-only marital sex, but give him time. ..................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2024/06/03/texas-professors-to-fail-students-seek-abortions/
Liberal In Texas
(16,270 posts)And in Austin, no less.
maga cum lousy?
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)Oh wait, I see what you did there.... jajajajaja
machoneman
(4,128 posts)Liberal In Texas
(16,270 posts)Also, Texas doesn't have a monopoly on RWNJs
I'll bet whatever state you're in has it's share too.
Our biggest problem is getting people to vote. And the oligarchs funding the propaganda.
ananda
(35,145 posts)There is a law professor there who got caught, with his
world champion wife... cheating at bridge.
Banned from ACBL for ten years and lost all their points
and rank.
central scrutinizer
(12,654 posts)I bid 34 No Trump
ananda
(35,145 posts)!!!
Lovie777
(22,983 posts)never go there for school. I see all of the punishments are gear towards women.
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)So who exactly are they supposed to sow oats with if all the young women must remain virgins until marriage? Prostitutes? Other young men?
MagickMuffin
(18,318 posts)The young lads can learn one way to have sex. Man on top, only,
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)CTyankee
(68,202 posts)college and lived in New York.
Irish_Dem
(81,271 posts)Men are half the reproductive equation and are immune from consequences.
lindysalsagal
(22,915 posts)Women in red states. These cavemen are enjoying their brief moment of misogyny. They're feeling empowered to control half the population.
Diamond_Dog
(40,578 posts)They should be forced to resign.
How would they find out if one of their students had an abortion, anyway?
CincyDem
(7,392 posts)Iirc theres a site that rates and ranks schools for social life and this lawsuit should put UT low on the list, thats for sure.
Fla Dem
(27,633 posts)Do the female students now have to report their reason for their absences?
IT IS NONE OF THE COLLEGES BUSINESS!
Both of these "professors" should be terminated, or if under contract, not have their contracts renewed.
vankuria
(968 posts)Do they have to bring a note to class on why they were absent or worse yet bring their private medical records to class for their professor to read? And what about the guy that impregnated them, does he get an F too?
TSExile
(3,363 posts)Never the guy!!! God forbid men actually face the same standards for the same situation as women.
Ms. Toad
(38,640 posts)Unexcused absences from my class lowered a student's grade. Health care was an excused absence (so no impact). Three unexcused absences gave me the discretion to have the student removed from my class with an F. I didn't require a doctor's note, nor did I ask for details as to what the health care need was, But I would have been permitted to require documentation signed by medical personnel.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)Usually, we received the syllable and were responsible for getting the work done and coming to the tests (which did require an excused absence if missed). Most of the profs would post notes of their lecture online.
Ms. Toad
(38,640 posts)In 3 degrees, currently working on a 4th, I'm pretty sure I've never had a professor without an attendance policy. In each of the classes I am currently taking (5 so far) the rule is that the 4th unexcused absence = failure. Not all have enforced it, but attendance was at least formally required. I didn't have the syllabi for the classes from my earlier degrees, so I can't confirm my memory.
In law school, where I've gone through the accreditation process, if professors aren't requiring attendance it is a basis for yanking accreditation. I suspect it is also an accreditation issue for art schools, as well, but I'll know more next spring when my school goes through it's accreditation review.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)Fla Dem
(27,633 posts)They would think they're doing their patriotic duty to tattle.
If the woman is at all knowledgeable, she'd be plenty aware of the anti-abortion climate in Texas and not confide in anyone but family. She would have to travel out of state so that might cause some suspicion among her acquaintances. But what get me is that any of them would rat her out to the 2 douchebag professors.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)College students are chaos goblins in a lot of ways. People like to feel helpful. It's also a great revenge opportunity, or just a chance to cause trouble.
Fla Dem
(27,633 posts)Skittles
(171,716 posts)who does that?
dlk
(13,247 posts)These obscene professors need to remove their noses from their students genitals and reproductive organs. This is perverted beyond belief!
Skittles
(171,716 posts)how are they aware of the personal lives of female students?
dlk
(13,247 posts)Its a brave new world.
Skittles
(171,716 posts)are these gals posting about it on social media?
FHRRK
(1,410 posts)If I owned Hell and Texas, Id rent out Texas and live in Hell.
Would you please explore the provenance of this joke?
Quote Investigator: Philip Sheridan was a General in the Union Army during the U.S. Civil War. In February 1866 a newspaper in Mobile, Alabama reported on a remark he made about Texas. The word hell was sanitized via the omission of two letters to yield hl which fit contemporary sensibilities.
dalton99a
(94,125 posts)
Vogon_Glory
(10,297 posts)Not biology, not pre-med? And how did you find about your students medical condition? Somebodys data base?
Sounds to me like there was either a tremendous breach of privacy somewhere or you want to flunk her on the basis of rumor or innuendo.
Personally, I hope that female patients who go to Planned Parenthood or other clinics for cancer tests or health check-ups and then get accused of having abortions turn around and sue the data collectors or people who use their (often inaccurate or corrupt) information and sue their accusers within an inch of their lives.
cab67
(3,749 posts)niyad
(132,440 posts)mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)and everywhere, but Texas is striving to lead the nation in abusing women, and this is abuse.
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)which is one of the most liberal states.
mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)but in Texas they have the full support of the governor and most of the state government. Women are in real danger there, in my opinion, and with Abbott pardoning murderers, it just got more dangerous.
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(6,780 posts)SARose
(1,831 posts)1. Another test lawsuit; note the grinning little weasels pic in front of the Tower;
2. Faculty do not decide who does/does not receive an excused absence;
3. TAs and instructors have rights, too.
4. Filed in Kacsmaryks court in Amarillo.
I would love to be a fly on the wall in the Office of the Dean of Students. 😂
Ditto for the UT System Legal Department. 😉
Tempest in a teapot.
TSExile
(3,363 posts)The last place I want the government - or college - is in my bedroom.
Wednesdays
(22,603 posts)The Supreme Court: there is no Constitutional right to privacy.
Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)Model35mech
(2,047 posts)as it would likely trip more students of color (I'm not sure if that by itself is a stereotype, or evidence based)
BUT UT does not hire employees (including faculty) who have been convicted of felonies within the 7 years previous to their application.
I wonder if -THAT- hiring practice, undoubtedly known to faculty, is why the two profs chose to push this button.
Johonny
(26,179 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 3, 2024, 10:50 AM - Edit history (1)
Be fired? I mean, other students that impregnated as there is no way these professors have ever bonked their students. No way . . .
Dudes gave their whole game away.
Big Blue Marble
(5,691 posts)not being fired immediately? Why is federal monies not be held back until
they are fired? If charges of anti-semitism, true or false, get you fired why
do not these openly stated biases cause the same reaction?
ExciteBike66
(2,700 posts)I mean, rock climbing is a choice.
NoMoreRepugs
(12,076 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)Attilatheblond
(8,878 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)malaise
(296,115 posts)These people are sick and criminal
UncleTomsEvilBrother
(954 posts)...I have a problem with us always saying these republican lawmakers are "wackos" and that they are "crazy." Those descriptions take away from the fact that they are hateful and toxic people.
Often, these politicians are smart (heck, these two are professors), they just have a diabolical plan to unleash control. They are not crazy at all. They are politicians. They vote. They are hateful, toxic, and harmful people.
harumph
(3,279 posts)flying_wahini
(8,275 posts)Lets make it mandatory full surgical castration for rapists and just chemical castration for men who get women pregnant. Especially if the men arent married. Lets teach those horny men a lesson that they will remember, right?
Dont know why men wouldnt go along with it. I mean they ARE Christians, right?
Glaisne
(645 posts)is a hypocrite? Let's look into his private life and see what perversions lurk there. Same for those two 'professors', they're a disgrace to academia.
Joinfortmill
(21,167 posts)See you at the polls.
Glaisne
(645 posts)Asking for a friend.
Gruenemann
(1,054 posts)And I live there
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Texin
(2,851 posts)The men (primarily) of this state are on a continuous race to the bottom of the swirling toilet bowl. I've warned my stepson and his wife to be extremely cautious about coming here when she was pregnant (about two years ago) after the draconian anti-abortion legislation was enacted, because god help her if she had had any kind of catastrophic health issue during the later term of her pregnancy, they would've been shit out of luck. I cannot believe how we've landed in this place.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)cab67
(3,749 posts)...there might be consequences for the assertion that pregnancy always arises from "voluntary and consensual" behavior, which is flagrantly wrong.
bucolic_frolic
(55,141 posts)Botany
(77,324 posts)They need to mind their own business. And BTW I am willing to bet both professors are
being well compensated to bring their law suits. U.T @ Austin needs to fire those shits
right now because a students grade should be based on his or hers course and class work
and not for what they do In their private lives.
cab67
(3,749 posts)Botany
(77,324 posts)Btw U.T. Austin has always been known as a good school and I have known
a few of the faculty and students from there and they were stand up people.
cab67
(3,749 posts)What they did was every shade of wrong except illegal, so far as I can tell.
There might be consequences (e.g. modification of teaching load, ability to advise grad students, etc.), but this would be for the protection of others as much as admonishment for bigotry. If was their department chair, I'd do whatever I could to make sure women and LGBTQ students are never forced to be in their presence, for example. I would also investigate their grading practices throughout his career to look for what an administrator would euphemistically call "irregularities," which could bring further sanction.
But outright firing them is probably not an option.
That said, Bonevac got his PhD in 1980, so he'd be close to retirement as it is. Not sure about the other one.
PlutosHeart
(1,445 posts)they most likely cannot be fired at least easily anyways.
I am just stunned that they are acting what seems independently from the school that they represent. Usually they are held to some standards. Holy cow.
Gruenemann
(1,054 posts)Not bloody likely.
PlutosHeart
(1,445 posts)Thank you.
Botany
(77,324 posts)
. what an instructor or professor thinks about their PRIVATE LIVES. This crosses some
different lines as per professional and academic integrity and although I might be wrong
for the 1st time in my life I think that the professors might be getting some right wing
money to carry their water as per abortion.
Btw as a dull old straight man where the hell do those men get off on telling a woman
what they can and cant do about with their own bodies?
Mblaze
(1,040 posts)Another example of the "my way or the highway" attitude that finally drove my dear departed father to shouting at me that. "There is no such thing as the color gray; it's either black or white".
I reminded him that Ansel Adams made his successful career on what he called "the Gray Scale" showing that not only does the color gray exist, but there is a wide scale of gray-tones that he could work with.
"There is more on heaven and Earth, Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy".
ilovegamers43
(86 posts)The abortion issue hurts to watch
appleannie1
(5,457 posts)Other than that, they can kiss off.
flying_wahini
(8,275 posts)Daniel A. Bonevac is a UT philosophy professor who supports Trump and publicly espouses reactionary beliefs. In October 2016, Bonevac was one of 146 scholars nationwide who jointly declared their support for Donald Trump as president in a public statement.
Bonevac is open about his traditionally conservative political views, which include patriarchal, imperialist, capitalist, and racist attitudes as well as a deep disdain for the progressive worldview. He claims to keep political bias out of the classroom, but we know this isnt possible, and the oppressions he upholds will inevitably be perpetuated through his teaching. Anyone who believes a fascist like Trump would make a good president must be okay with, if not in support of, misogyny, racism, abuse, rape culture, ableism, and other oppressive behaviors and beliefs which directly harm UT students. The harmful views of reactionaries such as Bonevac on campus both enable and indirectly encourage violence against marginalized students, creating an unsafe university environment.
Administrative response: The university has not made any response or taken any action.
perdita9
(1,352 posts)I taught at the college level for 15 years. I didn't care why students had to take time off as long as they notified me and we agreed to a schedule for them to make up the work.
Their medical issues were none of my business. I certainly would never have asked about what procedure they were getting.
niyad
(132,440 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)ought to be "sued"----
and by "sued", I don't actually mean 'sued' within a court of law,
but out in the Texas desert of 'the court of public opinion'.....
There used to be a saying in Texas---
I can't remember what it was specifically at this moment.... lol
Deep State Witch
(12,717 posts)They're in the doctorate program there. I worry for them.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)is because a man got a woman pregnant? Women don't magically get pregnant on their own, which is what people like this seem to think.
Old Crank
(7,078 posts)That all males turn in their DNA for matches to pregnancies and have to pay full support until the child is 18 or 23?
Wednesdays
(22,603 posts)GOTV. Just GOTV.
See my sig line.
duncang
(3,767 posts)From Texass abortion bounty hunter law. The mob mentality of the gop. I will control your life. You dont do something I dont like and I will get you. A new take on the Bible. Vengeance is mine say the gop.
Initech
(108,783 posts)The cruelty of the pro life death cult is the point, and it knows no boundaries.
LeftInTX
(34,295 posts)State of Texas is also a plaintiff.
UT professors sue Biden administration over new Title IX abortion, gender identity rules
Two University of Texas professors are challenging President Joe Biden's administration over new rules it issued prohibiting discrimination against transgender and nonbinary students as well as students who seek abortions.
Now plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit, UT professors Daniel A. Bonevac and John Hatfield, in near-identical declarations filed May 13, say they will not excuse class absences for students who get elective abortions and will not honor requests to refer to students by the pronoun "they," often used as a singular pronoun by nonbinary people.
The professors' lawsuit claims the U.S. Department of Education overstepped its authority when it issued new regulations forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, sex characteristics or pregnancy status. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed the suit in early May.
The rules at issue, released April 19 and set to go into effect Aug. 1, expand the interpretation of Title IX the 1972 federal statute that forbids gender-based discrimination in all federally funded education programs, including athletic programs to also protect against unequal treatment of students who become pregnant, terminate a pregnancy or are recovering from pregnancy, and "strengthen requirements that schools provide reasonable modifications for students based on pregnancy or related conditions."
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/state/2024/06/03/ut-austin-professors-sue-biden-over-abortions-lgbtq-rules-texas/73913404007/
____
The Salon title makes it sound like there are named students who the profs are planning to fail. However, they are seeking to block new rules because they say the conflict with Texas laws. I hope they don't win because the entire thing is frivilious. However, there is a chance they will. With regards to abortion, they do not want to allow an excused absence. So, if someone presents an excuse from a doctor stating they had an abortion, they do not want to excuse the absence. However, they are not currently failing students who "they heard through the grapevine" that they go an abortion.
spanone
(141,616 posts)Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)I am going to sue for the right to have these asswipes involuntarily castrated, sans anesthesia. I mean, apparently it's a free for all in Texas in terms of how people are empowered to control the lives and bodies of others, so I should be allowed to whack off their junk with a machete, right?
(Please don't tell me I need to add: /s ... )
TSExile
(3,363 posts)Women and girls can't get pregnant all by themselves. Why not regulate the men, too? Of course not...men are special.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)have only men in the magical/starring roles, like God/Yahweh, Jesus, Moses, etc. What a coincidence that a patriarchal society made up patriarchal stories that cast women as "the lessers." And we're still suffering to this day because of these dumbass religions.
LAS14
(15,506 posts)SupportSanity
(1,582 posts)people just get in the way. They are opinionated. They don't just follow like they should.
Any way to acomplish the goal of destroying educational institutions is automatically pre-approved.