General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOldBaldy1701E
(11,306 posts)For the multi-bar package. Singles are bigger.
Not sure about this, but I have seen it in other products that offer both single and multi-packaged options.
And, yes, it is corporate fuckery of the highest magnitude. Not just the playing with details to get what they want, but the complete lack of even trying to be discreet about it says they don't care if you like it or not.
VMA131Marine
(5,292 posts)But have lower density and therefore weigh the same. Wait until they figure out how to make hollow bars of soap
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Response to keithbvadu2 (Reply #4)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
wolfie001
(7,822 posts)They bought all the tree farms and manufacturing if I remember correctly. Paper towel prices doubled in like one year. About 20 years ago. I've been buying store brand or Nature's Promise ever since. I refuse to spend $24.99 for 4 fucking paper towel rolls. Excuse my french.
Response to wolfie001 (Reply #19)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
markodochartaigh
(5,545 posts)when the only physical parameter given is weight, and that parameter is directly below the claim that the bars are now "larger", I'm of the opinion that this is false advertising.
dalton99a
(94,750 posts)
Response to digsub (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
wolfie001
(7,822 posts).....used to be in half gallon containers (64 oz). Before hedge funds and private equity. We were skinnier too because there was no high fructose corn syrup.
Response to wolfie001 (Reply #21)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
NanaCat
(2,332 posts)Sugar is in foods where you would never expect to see it these days, where it doesn't even belong, really. That is contributing to the surge in morbid obesity and diabetes. And it's no better for you than HCFS. Both do the same thing to your liver: Generate fat cells.
Really.
And sweets alone are not the problem. People are consuming far more fizzy drinks and junk food snacks than they did in the 60s and even the 70s. I was a 70s teen, and remember how most parents, even the well-to-do ones like mine, bought those things only for a special occasion, like a family gathering or a party. We never had it with meals, and never had it between meals, either, unless my brothers and I used money we scrounged up to buy one when we were away from the parents. Families across socioeconomic lines ate real food for the majority of their meals. Even poor families ate better than too many people do these days. Before my mum and her brothers could help them out, my grandparents were quite poor, and yet they didn't eat junk food or fast food at all--it was three squares of meat and veg and fruit, not processed rubbish. That surely helped keep the weight down.
Plus, we were simply more active back then. Most parents in the 70s restricted telly viewing to a few hours a day--if that, and the Saturday morning cartoons for the younger sprogs. Unless one was an avid reader (guilty here), that meant sticking around the house was a bore. My brothers were constantly outside, riding bikes, climbing trees, enjoying 'sandlot' type sports with their friends, and so on. I did someo of it, too, if I got bored enough.
Plus, we used our own feet to get around more often in general, either by walking, biking or skating. We didn't use our cars for idiotic things like going to the grocer a few blocks over for some milk when we had perfectly capable feet to take us there. The last thing my parents wanted to do after long commutes to and from work was spend time in a bloody car. So they sent one of us to get the milk, LOL.
I don't think most people realise how very much life has changed from the 70s when people were routinely active and ate better, to one where they were far more sedentary and ate too much crap.
wolfie001
(7,822 posts)He talked about how it's foreign to the body and your internal organs can't tell your stomach when you've had enough. With real sugar, you start to feel sick to your stomach when you overindulged. When I was 13 or so, I remember never being able to drink a second can of Coke. Your body would be like "blech". With HFCS, all of the sudden people were getting humongous, big fountain drinks at 7 Eleven. Overnight it seemed. Big Gulps (32 oz drinks). Your body still telling you, "I'm not full". Really diabolical, toxic stuff. Cheers
Hugin
(37,916 posts)I guess the HFCS police are no longer trolling DU.
Backstory: It was back in the aughts, I casually mentioned that for some stupid reason HFCS was being added to, yes, corn syrup. Its presence made most retail corn syrup useless for cooking hard candy and brittles.
I was instantly clobbered by the HFCS lobby. Sealioned mercilessly, tarred & feathered, and ridden out of GD on a rail. Prior to which I had single handedly fought a valiant battle of posting reams of peer reviewed articles and studies stating pretty much the same conclusions about HFCS as youve pointed out. HFCS is not food.
I believe that as I was ox carted away, I was screaming in all caps that HFCS has as much to do with corn as latex paint has to do with rubber trees.
Anyway, the event changed me and I no longer approach any online forum with nearly the level of naiveties that I once had.
I wonder what happened to them? I suppose they moved on to be global warming denial or maybe anti-vaxxers.
He had two very famous lectures. One was in 2010 called The Bitter Truth. The one I saw was from 2014:
This lecture gob-smacked me. I wish I'd seen something like this 40 years ago. I'm always telling my kids to watch their sugar intake plus carbs. I saw it in 2015 and I pretty much cut back on a lot of junk eating in general. Cheers
Hugin
(37,916 posts)Fortunately, genetics had my back on that one. I have aggressively cut my starch and carb levels dramatically since then. Way more than half and had a moment there when I learned that I had already only been eating a fraction of the carbs of the average American. It was terrifying.
Thanks for the video, this is going to take some time to plow through!
wolfie001
(7,822 posts)JoseBalow
(9,609 posts)I roll big joints, man
Response to JoseBalow (Reply #24)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
pansypoo53219
(23,104 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,962 posts)basically skinnier in the middle to "conform to body curves" which basically means it will break in half before I've used it all.
fierywoman
(8,608 posts)Response to fierywoman (Reply #7)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
erronis
(24,131 posts)Magoo48
(6,725 posts)Response to Magoo48 (Reply #11)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
wolfie001
(7,822 posts)Sorry, but your comment made me think of that and the whole mess she started. Of course she posed with donald dump in the Oval Office.
JoseBalow
(9,609 posts)TSExile
(3,363 posts)"I'm not sure exactly coined the term 'fun-sized', but I'm sure it wasn't a woman." - Jay Leno
wolfie001
(7,822 posts)NanaCat
(2,332 posts)They were great for families with kids. You could let them have a small treat, rather than putting them at risk for a diabetic coma with a full size candy bar of bag o' cavity rot.
Speaking of.. Candy bars now are bigger than they were in the 70s. I'm not talking about the king-size bars, but the regular ones. I think they maxed out in the 80s, though.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,447 posts)Response to WinstonSmith4740 (Reply #14)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Apples Trick for Using As Little Gold As Possible in Its New, $17,000 Gold Watch
https://slate.com/business/2015/03/apple-watch-edition-the-company-found-a-trick-to-use-as-little-gold-as-possible-in-its-new-gold-watch.html
CincyDem
(7,402 posts)One is a weight measure (less) and the other is a volume measure bigger size).
Not saying its right but playing with the density allow both to be true.
bucolic_frolic
(55,454 posts)Captain Zero
(8,936 posts)There's nothing to them.
Oneironaut
(6,307 posts)Companies are making record profits, AND, shrinking products, raising prices, laying Americans off, out-sourcing, begging the government for corporate welfare.
Because, there can never be too much. 10 houses later, 50 cars later, 5 luxury yachts later, they need to suck out more of our souls. Fucking scum.
Response to Oneironaut (Reply #35)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.

