Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,085 posts)
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 07:54 PM Jun 2024

Speaker Johnson faces blowback after following Trump's directive

Donald Trump demanded that unqualified loyalists to have access to many of the nation’s most sensitive secrets. House Speaker Mike Johnson acquiesced.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/speaker-johnson-faces-blowback-trumps-directive-rcna156068

Members of the House Intelligence Committee made it painfully clear to House Speaker Mike Johnson that he needed to choose responsibly when filling two vacancies on the panel. The Intelligence Committee has made a deliberate effort to steer clear of partisan food fights lately, and it feared that Johnson would screw this up by imposing rabid ideologues on the panel.....

This week, Johnson nevertheless named Perry and Jackson to the House Intelligence Committee.

Democrats were not pleased. Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia, for example, called the appointments “a disgrace and a threat to national security.”

But they weren’t alone. The New York Times reported that the House speaker didn’t even bother to give a heads-up to Rep. Mike Turner, the House Intelligence Committee’s Republican chairman, and PunchBowl News reported that Johnson’s move “is causing angst across the Capitol,” adding, “Several members of the committee — Republicans and Democrats — say they worry about the integrity of the panel in the wake of Johnson’s appointment of the pair.”.....

So, why in the world did the House speaker choose two unqualified extremists for the House Intelligence Committee, even after the panel’s members urged him not to? PunchBowl News’ report added this gem:

Johnson told fellow Republican lawmakers and aides that he made the appointments at the behest of Trump, who wanted Jackson and Perry on the panel.


Oh. So, Donald Trump wanted unqualified loyalists to have access to many of the nation’s most sensitive and highly classified secrets, and the House speaker followed the felon’s directive, as if he were an employee of the failed former president instead of Congress’ most powerful member......

And finally, there are broader consequences to keep in mind. The Times’ report added, “The panel has historically operated in a bipartisan manner, and is largely composed of serious-minded lawmakers rather than strident partisans. The break with tradition prompted fears that the intelligence community might pull back on the sensitive national security information it shares with Congress.”

It’s not surprising that Trump wouldn’t care, but Johnson has a responsibility to take such concerns seriously. This week, he failed spectacularly at a basic task.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Speaker Johnson faces blowback after following Trump's directive (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 OP
Speaker of the Fraud Johnson must be getting something in return. What is it? flying_wahini Jun 2024 #1
He gets to be ceremonial monkey holding the wooden hammer JT45242 Jun 2024 #3
He wants the VP slot ... aggiesal Jun 2024 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2024 #15
Come on, they're just putting in a direct link from US intelligence to Putin. sinkingfeeling Jun 2024 #2
K&R spanone Jun 2024 #4
No words. sheshe2 Jun 2024 #5
Don the Felon Mob Boss owns you. Pathetic spineless suck up Johnson. Evolve Dammit Jun 2024 #6
House and Senate Russiapublicans are a threat to the country. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2024 #7
A clear and present danger and should be treated as such. paleotn Jun 2024 #11
Is the DOJ investigating any of them? MotownPgh Jun 2024 #32
Do his ears turn red when he lies? n/t Harker Jun 2024 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2024 #16
I'd lost track of that pact, given the others he's evidently made. Harker Jun 2024 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2024 #18
Yes. Jawdroppingly weird. Harker Jun 2024 #19
Those secrets are widely known now and not secret. paleotn Jun 2024 #10
It only takes ONE. Volaris Jun 2024 #12
Trump knows these idiots will give him the information FloridaBlues Jun 2024 #13
I hope minority leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks to this so that it's in the Congressional Record. ancianita Jun 2024 #14
Johnson isn't irresponsible. He's criminally negligent. Martin68 Jun 2024 #20
Who says it's negligence? returnee Jun 2024 #31
Good point. Martin68 Jun 2024 #34
Yes, the Intelligence Committee needs to "pull back" birdographer Jun 2024 #21
He deserves a stern tongue lashing. progressoid Jun 2024 #22
When Mike approaches St. Peter at the Gate, St. Peter will be pointing to the Down Escalator Traurigkeit Jun 2024 #23
Unfortunately "blowback" never deters these guy SomedayKindaLove Jun 2024 #24
Thar he blows, me boys... Thar he blows..... Blue Owl Jun 2024 #25
Fuck the GOPs LuvLoogie Jun 2024 #26
Are the other GOP members edhopper Jun 2024 #27
The Convicted Felon is a private citizen. Yet repugs bestow all their power to him. GreenWave Jun 2024 #28
What a spineless toady BoRaGard Jun 2024 #29
I don't recall, why did we help save this guy? -nt CrispyQ Jun 2024 #30
Speaker Johnson's picks for the Intel Committee: a Trump drug dealer and an Ambien-popping loon. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #33
Oh, Miiiiiiiike.... ShazzieB Jun 2024 #35
Just my opinion vankuria Jun 2024 #36
These two would never qualify for the security clearances needed to clean the bathrooms at the Pentagon LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #37

JT45242

(4,049 posts)
3. He gets to be ceremonial monkey holding the wooden hammer
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 08:03 PM
Jun 2024

He got nothing except a delay on the next move to vacate

Response to aggiesal (Reply #8)

paleotn

(22,264 posts)
11. A clear and present danger and should be treated as such.
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 08:53 PM
Jun 2024

And we thought Dana Rohrabacher was the extent of Russia's reach. That man belong in supermax. Fucking traitor.

Response to Harker (Reply #9)

Harker

(17,832 posts)
17. I'd lost track of that pact, given the others he's evidently made.
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 09:29 PM
Jun 2024

He's twisted into some pretty ornate knots.

Response to Harker (Reply #17)

paleotn

(22,264 posts)
10. Those secrets are widely known now and not secret.
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 08:50 PM
Jun 2024

But in fairness, those in the intel community say letting Congress know anything important is a bad idea since they're favorite pastime is blabbing. Ever find it useful to release secret info? Tell Congress.

Volaris

(11,720 posts)
12. It only takes ONE.
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 08:56 PM
Jun 2024

And I'm not sure the lunatics were smart enough to include a provision that requires that ONE, to come from the majority party.

Speaker Mike is more dangerous than trump 2.0 would be, because he's the one that will write the script.

ancianita

(43,308 posts)
14. I hope minority leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks to this so that it's in the Congressional Record.
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 09:10 PM
Jun 2024

returnee

(935 posts)
31. Who says it's negligence?
Sat Jun 8, 2024, 10:30 AM
Jun 2024

More likely just criminal-like treason type criminal. All their communications should monitored. Maybe even a sting operation. Frankly, I cannot see why TSF Convict is not confined somewhere for national security reasons. Someplace like Gitmo.

birdographer

(2,937 posts)
21. Yes, the Intelligence Committee needs to "pull back"
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 09:39 PM
Jun 2024

on what it shares. Like, let's stick to who is ahead on Dancing With The Stars, where Waldo is, whether the Bake-Off recipes are legit, and whether that deli down the street charges more for a Reuben if you are in Congress. Republicans will be fine trying to process all that info.

SomedayKindaLove

(1,186 posts)
24. Unfortunately "blowback" never deters these guy
Fri Jun 7, 2024, 10:29 PM
Jun 2024

My biggest fear is Russia will nuke us before the election. Can someone please talk me out of this fear and help me realize I’m just being paranoid? Thanks in advance.

LuvLoogie

(8,825 posts)
26. Fuck the GOPs
Sat Jun 8, 2024, 09:47 AM
Jun 2024

They could censure/remove anyone of those fuckwads. Johnson is your Speaker you trumplicker racist cowards.

edhopper

(37,379 posts)
27. Are the other GOP members
Sat Jun 8, 2024, 09:49 AM
Jun 2024

not compromised by Putin and full well know the new members are. Will they willfully allow our secrets to be compromised by these two. Will they pick Party over Country.

GreenWave

(12,651 posts)
28. The Convicted Felon is a private citizen. Yet repugs bestow all their power to him.
Sat Jun 8, 2024, 09:56 AM
Jun 2024

Where in the Constitution does it grant such acquiescence?

vankuria

(968 posts)
36. Just my opinion
Sat Jun 8, 2024, 04:47 PM
Jun 2024

I think trump has some juicy tidbits on Mike Johnson and trump is known to hire investigators to get dirt on people. Again, only my opinion but I think Mike has some skeletons in his “closet”, if ya know what I mean.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Speaker Johnson faces blo...