General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpeaker Johnson faces blowback after following Trump's directive
Donald Trump demanded that unqualified loyalists to have access to many of the nations most sensitive secrets. House Speaker Mike Johnson acquiesced.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/speaker-johnson-faces-blowback-trumps-directive-rcna156068
This week, Johnson nevertheless named Perry and Jackson to the House Intelligence Committee.
Democrats were not pleased. Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia, for example, called the appointments a disgrace and a threat to national security.
But they werent alone. The New York Times reported that the House speaker didnt even bother to give a heads-up to Rep. Mike Turner, the House Intelligence Committees Republican chairman, and PunchBowl News reported that Johnsons move is causing angst across the Capitol, adding, Several members of the committee Republicans and Democrats say they worry about the integrity of the panel in the wake of Johnsons appointment of the pair......
So, why in the world did the House speaker choose two unqualified extremists for the House Intelligence Committee, even after the panels members urged him not to? PunchBowl News report added this gem:
Johnson told fellow Republican lawmakers and aides that he made the appointments at the behest of Trump, who wanted Jackson and Perry on the panel.
Oh. So, Donald Trump wanted unqualified loyalists to have access to many of the nations most sensitive and highly classified secrets, and the House speaker followed the felons directive, as if he were an employee of the failed former president instead of Congress most powerful member......
And finally, there are broader consequences to keep in mind. The Times report added, The panel has historically operated in a bipartisan manner, and is largely composed of serious-minded lawmakers rather than strident partisans. The break with tradition prompted fears that the intelligence community might pull back on the sensitive national security information it shares with Congress.
Its not surprising that Trump wouldnt care, but Johnson has a responsibility to take such concerns seriously. This week, he failed spectacularly at a basic task.
flying_wahini
(8,275 posts)Money?
JT45242
(4,049 posts)He got nothing except a delay on the next move to vacate
aggiesal
(10,821 posts)So he'll do whatever Pendejo45 asks of him.
Response to aggiesal (Reply #8)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
sinkingfeeling
(57,842 posts)spanone
(141,678 posts)sheshe2
(97,681 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,786 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)paleotn
(22,264 posts)And we thought Dana Rohrabacher was the extent of Russia's reach. That man belong in supermax. Fucking traitor.
MotownPgh
(462 posts)We'll never know.
Harker
(17,832 posts)Response to Harker (Reply #9)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Harker
(17,832 posts)He's twisted into some pretty ornate knots.
Response to Harker (Reply #17)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Harker
(17,832 posts)Their oddity can be distracting.
paleotn
(22,264 posts)But in fairness, those in the intel community say letting Congress know anything important is a bad idea since they're favorite pastime is blabbing. Ever find it useful to release secret info? Tell Congress.
Volaris
(11,720 posts)And I'm not sure the lunatics were smart enough to include a provision that requires that ONE, to come from the majority party.
Speaker Mike is more dangerous than trump 2.0 would be, because he's the one that will write the script.
FloridaBlues
(4,672 posts)Dangerous move Short term speaker Johnson
ancianita
(43,308 posts)Martin68
(27,779 posts)returnee
(935 posts)More likely just criminal-like treason type criminal. All their communications should monitored. Maybe even a sting operation. Frankly, I cannot see why TSF Convict is not confined somewhere for national security reasons. Someplace like Gitmo.
Martin68
(27,779 posts)birdographer
(2,937 posts)on what it shares. Like, let's stick to who is ahead on Dancing With The Stars, where Waldo is, whether the Bake-Off recipes are legit, and whether that deli down the street charges more for a Reuben if you are in Congress. Republicans will be fine trying to process all that info.
progressoid
(53,206 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)SomedayKindaLove
(1,186 posts)My biggest fear is Russia will nuke us before the election. Can someone please talk me out of this fear and help me realize Im just being paranoid? Thanks in advance.
Blue Owl
(59,163 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,825 posts)They could censure/remove anyone of those fuckwads. Johnson is your Speaker you trumplicker racist cowards.
edhopper
(37,379 posts)not compromised by Putin and full well know the new members are. Will they willfully allow our secrets to be compromised by these two. Will they pick Party over Country.
GreenWave
(12,651 posts)Where in the Constitution does it grant such acquiescence?
BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)Placing a fugging repube felon over America's safety.
CrispyQ
(40,983 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(180,085 posts)ShazzieB
(22,637 posts)
vankuria
(968 posts)I think trump has some juicy tidbits on Mike Johnson and trump is known to hire investigators to get dirt on people. Again, only my opinion but I think Mike has some skeletons in his closet, if ya know what I mean.


