General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe “anti-Semitism” smear campaign against CAP and Media Matters rolls on
Last month, my Salon colleague Justin Elliott revealed that AIPACs former spokesman, Josh Block, had been encouraging neoconservative journalists and pundits on a private email list to attack as anti-Semites various Middle East commentators employed by two of the most influential Democratic-Party-aligned organizations: the Center for American Progress (CAP) and Media Matters (MM). Block distributed a dossier containing posts by these CAP and MM writers about Israel and Iran that he claimed evince anti-Semitism, and then issued these marching orders (emphasis in original): YOU SHOULD AMPLIFY this. And use the below [research] to attack the bad guys. The predictable roster of neoconservative, hatemongering extremists on that email list led by The Washington Posts Jennifer Rubin, who recruited the Simon Wiesenthal Center to the cause dutifully spewed out articles echoing Blocks attacks against these mostly young, liberal writers: Matt Duss, Ali Gharib, Eli Clifton and Zaid Jilani at CAPs ThinkProgress blog and Media Matters MJ Rosenberg (a former AIPAC employee).
Blocks once-secret email campaign followed a Politico article by Ben Smith which accused (or, rather, credited) these CAP and MM writers with deviations from the bipartisan consensus on Israel and voicing a heretical and often critical stance on Israel heretofore confined to the political margins; moreover, Smith wrote, warm words for Israel can be hard to find on [CAP's] blogs. Block was quoted in that article accusing the two progressive groups of publishing anti-Israel and borderline anti-Semitic stuff; Smith subsequently acknowledged that it was Block who had fed him files containing the supposedly anti-Semitic posts in order to enable the article to be written. As I wrote about on December 14, this seemed to be one of those very rare instances where this sort of smear campaign backfired and only the smear merchant (Block) would suffer any consequences, as Blocks own business partner, Lanny Davis, publicly repudiated Blocks smears, and the Democratic-aligned Truman National Security Project then expelled Block for using mischaracterization or character attacks in order to impede the ability to debate difficult topics freely.
. . .
Since then, the standard army of low-level smear merchants has continued attacking these CAP and MM writers as anti-Semites. Last week in Haaretz, Marty Peretz long-time assistant, Jamie Kirchick, ironically claimed that it was Block and other neocons who are the victims of McCarthyism even as Kirchick, in the same column, advanced the witch hunt to expose hidden anti-Semites in Americas think tanks and media outlets (an even greater irony is found in Kirchicks self-anointed status as anti-bigotry crusader despite his long-term work for Peretz, probably the single most flagrant bigot and unapologetic spewer of hate speech in mainstream American discourse: but since its aimed at Arabs and Muslims, its all permissible). Earlier this week, Front Page Magazine singled out two of the targeted CAP writers with Arab-sounding names Ali Gharib and Zaid Jilani and accused them of being anti-American and driven by allegiance to Iran and Pakistan (that article also referred to them as Muslim bloggers even though Gharib, an Iranian-American, is an atheist). Yesterday, The New York Post published an Op-Ed by Commentarys Alana Goodman (under the headline The White Houses Israel-bashing pals) reporting that three leading Jewish groups the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the Simon Wiesenthal Center have accused CAP and its staff of publishing anti-Israel, hateful and toxic anti-Jewish material.
. . .
Is this not the most blatant evidence yet that these organizations and their adherents are manipulating and exploiting charges of anti-Semitism in order to stifle and punish perfectly legitimate political and policy debates about Israel? They are effectively admitting that anti-Semitism does not mean irrational hatred or animosity toward Jews its actual definition but rather now means: challenging or even questioning the policy assumptions and preferences of certain Jewish groups and the Israeli government. They are literally decreeing that you are barred from challenging the dubious premises of those who crave war with Iran, are further barred from questioning their fear-mongering about the Iranian nuclear program, are also barred from assigning blame to the settlement-expanding Israelis for the lack of a peace agreement, and are even barred from condemning the increasingly unsustainable and anti-democratic treatment of the Palestinians all upon pain of being formally condemned as anti-Semitic.
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_smear_campaign_against_cap_and_media_matters_rolls_on/singleton/