General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDutch Volleyball Player who Raped 12-Year-Old British Girl Qualifies to Compete at the Paris Olympics
by Oliver Brown of the Telegraph:
Steven van de Velde was sentenced in March 2016 to four years in prison after admitting three counts of rape against a child he had met on Facebook. He had flown from the Netherlands to the UK in August 2014, when he was 19, to meet his victim.
Judge Francis Sheridan told him: Prior to coming to this country you were training as a potential Olympian. Your hopes of representing your country now lie as a shattered dream.
Except Van de Velde, who was released after serving just 12 months at a Dutch prison, has since been allowed to rehabilitate his Olympic career, this month sealing his spot in the national pair at the Paris Games alongside Matthew Immers.
link to full story here: https://www.msn.com/en-ie/entertainment/tv/dutch-volleyball-player-who-raped-12-year-old-british-girl-qualifies-for-paris-olympics/ar-BB1oSz0l
Jesus fucking Christ.
Dave Bowman
(6,929 posts)orange jar
(878 posts)Girls (and women too) rarely receive justice. It is a worldwide epidemic.
ProfessorGAC
(76,122 posts)First, 12 months for child rape seems preposterously low.
Then, as a convicted sexual predator, the country's Olympic committee allowed him to participate?
Riduculous
orange jar
(878 posts)That's a bit of a broad brush, I know, but it's not uncommon to see athletes receive more leniency / grace than other groups of people, even when they've committed some of the worst crimes possible. Maybe it comes with the inherent privilege, I don't know, but it's genuinely so disheartening when rapist celebrities can move forward with their reputations intact.
ProfessorGAC
(76,122 posts)She missed an Olympics because of smoking pot. And, I wouldn't consider pot smoking to be a moral failing.
Yet, it cost her a life-long dream.
At least she qualified for this coming Olympics, too.
In this case, this guy shouldn't even be out of jail yet, let alone getting this opportunity.
I think more athletes pay a price for their transgressions that you suggest.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)They have always been old, regressive white fossils more interested in money and politics than sports or athletes, and certainly show no interest in human rights.
As a rule anyway, I'm sure there are exceptions occasionally. This doesn't sound like one.
ProfessorGAC
(76,122 posts)They have to prove me wrong for me to feel otherwise.
The situation in the OP is not one of the cases where they prove me wrong.
Igel
(37,427 posts)He committed a criminal act.
He was convicted.
He was sentenced.
He did his time. Under British laws.
Is what he did wrong and even horrendous? Yeah. It was.
But if we argue the government should grant him the right to vote and decide laws and representatives once a debt is paid, that's their business. He paid his debt--got debt relief, but he paid his debt.
The rest is moral revulsion (which I have no problem with) and mob (which I do have a problem with). But a democratic government can't afford to be a mob.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)Like it or not, they are held to be role models and symbols of integrity.
They get disciplined for even minor infractions of rules or laws in host countries.
He should have been dq'd, especially given the proximity to children in sports.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,824 posts)DUers are discussing an incredibly low sentence served. That does not make us a "mob".
is saying 12 months is less than a slap on the wrist for child rape. You don't agree?
niyad
(130,454 posts)niyad
(130,454 posts)niyad
(130,454 posts)harumph
(3,125 posts)prior to his competing again. Oh the irony~!
