General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like they're going to drag out the Trump immunity opinion till Monday
at least, just because they can.
https://www.scotusblog.com/events/2024-07/
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)They are under no burden to even rule on it at all this term. They can merely carry it over to next term with no explanation. Or carry it over for further argument without issuing a ruling.
They are the masters of their own schedule.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)announcing all these other opinions so slowly?
Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)And they are terrorizing us, and they are loving every
minute of it.
Attilatheblond
(8,878 posts)Maybe he just doesn't want to release the decision unless they all survive that rock's pass, in which case, he will have to face facts and go on record. But I think he's hoping for a big giant asteroid to save him from doing what has to be done.
2naSalit
(102,795 posts)Saturn goes stationary/retrograde on Saturday and Neptune next week. Will be interesting, just keep a grip on your psyche and don't let anything freak you out.
Attilatheblond
(8,878 posts)But astronomy, especially when tracking big asteroids, now THAT gets my attention.
2naSalit
(102,795 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...from being sued for election interference by deliberately witholding the anouncement of a decided ruling to effect the outcome of an election?
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,504 posts)Stump vs Sparkman and Mireles v. Waco are the 2 main cases.
Judges cannot be sued over actions taken in the course of their official duties or over actions taken during proceedings. They have immunity over official acts, but can still be sued and found liable for things outside of official acts.
Edit:
Should be noted, that even without the precedent, it would be difficult to establish standing to bring suit against them. It would also be near impossible to prove that they are purposely delaying in order to affect the election.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...even it was done in a specific way for reasons that do not fall under their official responsibilities.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,504 posts)Look up the Waco case. The judge issued a bench warrant for a lawyer who failed to appear at a scheduled hearing. He ordered the arresting officers to use excessive force(exact words if I remember were "rough him up to teach him a lesson" ) when doing so. The judge was sued and SCOTUS ruled that the judge had immunity over the order despite it being unprofessional and most likely criminal.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...and the debate hasn't even begun yet
Journeyman
(15,449 posts)Release it today, it may dominate the debate discussion. Release it tomorrow, it could overshadow all discussion of Trump's miserable performance. Release it Monday, it becomes the main topic of discussion throughout the short week and into the holiday weekend.
lees1975
(7,046 posts)Or they'd get it out before the debate.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)GaYellowDawg
(5,101 posts)What would be the Latin for that, so that they can use it as their official motto?
quia facere possunt
Those of you who know Latin, is that close?
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)GaYellowDawg
(5,101 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)pnwmom
(110,261 posts)pwb
(12,669 posts)If heaven is full of people like them no wonder people turn away from religion.