Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tarzanrock

(595 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2024, 02:37 AM Jun 2024

One real interesting legal point in the Debate

One very interesting legal point in the debate tonight happened when Biden brought up the Turd's criminal felony convictions and the Turd answered by claiming that he "did nothing wrong" and that Judge and the Prosecutor were Democrats who purposefully rigged the judicial system against the Turd. The Turd further falsely told the American people that his criminal convictions were all done at the behest of Joe Biden. This utter lack of any remorse nor contrition for his 34 Felony convictions is not going to sit well with Judge Merchan who is going to sentence the Turd on July 11 -- less than 2 weeks from today.

You don't get convicted by a unanimous Jury for committing 34 Felony crimes and then go out and tell a hundred million Americans that you "did nothing wrong" and that the Court, the Judge and Prosecutor all conspired to purposefully "rig" the trial against you at the behest of the President of the United States without there being "legal consequences" to that defamatory lie uttered to a hundred million people which was made and uttered on national television. There will be "consequences" to this egregious, wrongful conduct.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One real interesting legal point in the Debate (Original Post) Tarzanrock Jun 2024 OP
tRump weird enough to try to win debate at cost of increasing chance going to prison. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2024 #1
Possibly... but it wouldn't be a good thing FBaggins Jun 2024 #2
Acceptance of responsibility is a big consideration for sentencing and parole JoseBalow Jun 2024 #3
I appreciate your point True Dough Jun 2024 #4
Same here. oldsoftie Jun 2024 #5
2 juries. mopinko Jun 2024 #6

FBaggins

(27,934 posts)
2. Possibly... but it wouldn't be a good thing
Fri Jun 28, 2024, 04:26 AM
Jun 2024

It would play right into TFG’s hands/narrative

JoseBalow

(6,308 posts)
3. Acceptance of responsibility is a big consideration for sentencing and parole
Fri Jun 28, 2024, 05:00 AM
Jun 2024

His statements will not help him

True Dough

(21,556 posts)
4. I appreciate your point
Fri Jun 28, 2024, 05:20 AM
Jun 2024

and I really want the bastard to realize some serious consequences.

But I'll believe it when I see it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One real interesting lega...