General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat a sorry day from the Supremes
Criminalized homelessness, cut the legs off of government regulatory agencies, and probably did Trump's job of pardoning the January 6th insurrectionists.
More to come on Monday when they crown Dump emperor.
elleng
(141,926 posts)orangecrush
(30,969 posts)Yes, it's a one two hit.
elleng
(141,926 posts)orangecrush
(30,969 posts)Have a nice cup of coffee or tea and some pastry.
Solly Mack
(97,221 posts)orangecrush
(30,969 posts)Of course.
Solly Mack
(97,221 posts)bluesbassman
(20,387 posts)Hell, he probably won't even feel compelled to declare any his "gratuities". Why bother?
orangecrush
(30,969 posts)Solly Mack
(97,221 posts)Naturally, no need to tip until after you get your S'more.
orangecrush
(30,969 posts)They did heavy CYA
Solly Mack
(97,221 posts)rubbersole
(11,264 posts)angrychair
(12,462 posts)No other group, and definitely no other branch of government, can declare something legal and then directly benefit from that ruling the next day.
Solly Mack
(97,221 posts)JohnnyRingo
(20,972 posts)Shows just how cut & dried that case was.
His Cracker Jack legal team should be sanctioned for wasting everyone's time on a case they knew would lose.
By "Cracker Jack" I mean where he found them.
onenote
(46,217 posts)We know that at least five justices didn't want to give the relief he sought and if any of the others would have done so they didn't indicate their dissent
Mossfern
(4,751 posts)I'm not an expert on legal or political strategies, but this is quite disturbing.
Can the court be expanded or do we need a majority in both houses to do that?
It could possibly mean that the 'revolution' will come from the left, rather than the MAGAs.
Quanto Magnus
(1,368 posts)it has to be approved by both houses and the President. I was under the impression it's technically legislation to expand the court.
Disclaimer: I could be totally wrong on that....
I think we would need a filibuster proof majority if the Senate is to be involved. I think this is our largest hurdle (assuming a second Biden presidency), not only due to expanding the court, but nominating judges for the new seats.
PatSeg
(53,434 posts)disappointing week. In my mind, that usually means, it will get much, much better.
elleng
(141,926 posts)PatSeg
(53,434 posts)Trump has been making sane people's lives a living nightmare since 2016. We can't go through that again. For four years, everyone I know was a basket case. I have to believe this nightmare will finally end.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...set their tip jars right on the bench.
erronis
(24,417 posts)Woe be to someone who tries to help themselves to a bit of Thomas's/Alito's goodies!
orangecrush
(30,969 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,690 posts)This is a SCOTUS Dictatorship now. They are dismantling everything this country holds dear and has enacted/negotiated for the last 150 years.
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)AdamGG
(1,895 posts)their ruling on Dump's kingly immunity.
orangecrush
(30,969 posts)You know that.
Warpy
(114,650 posts)as those assholes think they rule this country. They are NOT going to want to share power with TFG, either.
If, by some miracle, we take Comgres and the White House, the first order of business needs to be to expand the court and restore balance to it.
It looks like it's going to be nearly impossible to remove Thomas and Alito.
republianmushroom
(22,615 posts)Robert's supreme court is the so called "swamp".
spanone
(142,020 posts)along with an orange turd.