General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat a sorry day from the Supremes
Criminalized homelessness, cut the legs off of government regulatory agencies, and probably did Trump's job of pardoning the January 6th insurrectionists.
More to come on Monday when they crown Dump emperor.
elleng
(141,926 posts)orangecrush
(30,642 posts)Yes, it's a one two hit.
elleng
(141,926 posts)orangecrush
(30,642 posts)Have a nice cup of coffee or tea and some pastry.
Solly Mack
(97,044 posts)orangecrush
(30,642 posts)Of course.
Solly Mack
(97,044 posts)bluesbassman
(20,384 posts)Hell, he probably won't even feel compelled to declare any his "gratuities". Why bother?
orangecrush
(30,642 posts)Solly Mack
(97,044 posts)Naturally, no need to tip until after you get your S'more.
orangecrush
(30,642 posts)They did heavy CYA
Solly Mack
(97,044 posts)rubbersole
(11,246 posts)angrychair
(12,359 posts)No other group, and definitely no other branch of government, can declare something legal and then directly benefit from that ruling the next day.
Solly Mack
(97,044 posts)JohnnyRingo
(20,920 posts)Shows just how cut & dried that case was.
His Cracker Jack legal team should be sanctioned for wasting everyone's time on a case they knew would lose.
By "Cracker Jack" I mean where he found them.
onenote
(46,186 posts)We know that at least five justices didn't want to give the relief he sought and if any of the others would have done so they didn't indicate their dissent
Mossfern
(4,730 posts)I'm not an expert on legal or political strategies, but this is quite disturbing.
Can the court be expanded or do we need a majority in both houses to do that?
It could possibly mean that the 'revolution' will come from the left, rather than the MAGAs.
Quanto Magnus
(1,357 posts)it has to be approved by both houses and the President. I was under the impression it's technically legislation to expand the court.
Disclaimer: I could be totally wrong on that....
I think we would need a filibuster proof majority if the Senate is to be involved. I think this is our largest hurdle (assuming a second Biden presidency), not only due to expanding the court, but nominating judges for the new seats.
PatSeg
(53,240 posts)disappointing week. In my mind, that usually means, it will get much, much better.
elleng
(141,926 posts)PatSeg
(53,240 posts)Trump has been making sane people's lives a living nightmare since 2016. We can't go through that again. For four years, everyone I know was a basket case. I have to believe this nightmare will finally end.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...set their tip jars right on the bench.
erronis
(24,082 posts)Woe be to someone who tries to help themselves to a bit of Thomas's/Alito's goodies!
orangecrush
(30,642 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,415 posts)This is a SCOTUS Dictatorship now. They are dismantling everything this country holds dear and has enacted/negotiated for the last 150 years.
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)AdamGG
(1,886 posts)their ruling on Dump's kingly immunity.
orangecrush
(30,642 posts)You know that.
Warpy
(114,647 posts)as those assholes think they rule this country. They are NOT going to want to share power with TFG, either.
If, by some miracle, we take Comgres and the White House, the first order of business needs to be to expand the court and restore balance to it.
It looks like it's going to be nearly impossible to remove Thomas and Alito.
republianmushroom
(22,426 posts)Robert's supreme court is the so called "swamp".
spanone
(141,822 posts)along with an orange turd.