General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho do they want if Biden does step down?
I want some names from these pundits and "democratic insiders".
Who does James Carville want for instance?
Spineless...
Turbineguy
(40,074 posts)wnylib
(26,014 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)If I was a Democratic campaign manager/strategist, I wouldn't have been married to a Republican consultant who ran the Bush campaign....
Hey, what was that scuttlebutt about Carville possibly passing inside information, or something, to his wife Mary Matalin during the Bush-Kerry election?
Can't remember exactly now--- but this has reminded me that there was something that didn't look quite right, back then
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)
:large
Newsom has at least 3 problems
1) the 'great white hope' issue with the D base if VP Harris is shoved aside
2) The Alex Tourk and Ruby Rippey-Tourk issue
3) The 'ewwww' factor as being married to Kimberly Guilfoyle for almost 5 years.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)struggle4progress
(126,153 posts)Blue Full Moon
(3,484 posts)The fascist (nazi) always take over one party and infiltrate the other to make controlled opposition. So I suspect that there are moles. Past practices so just repeated history but not exactly the same.
ForgedCrank
(3,096 posts)you are correct because they all know the consequences of dropping the popular candidate at this late stage of the race.
Remaining with Joe Biden as our candidate is a slim margin (according to polls that I don't necessarily trust), but replacing him is an almost guaranteed loss. I just don't get this. I know most of us didn't like what we saw in the debate performance, but dang man, these people should know better.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)Or a bunch of names who most Americans have never heard of.
bigtree
(94,261 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)FBaggins
(28,706 posts)Im not sure that theres an alternative that wouldnt cause more problems than solutions
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)But Joe is who we democratically voted to be our nominee & it's Joe who will carry us to victory!!
Sea Wolf
(17 posts)and support the only candidate who can defeat Trump. There's no one else, period. With their bullshit, hand wringing etc they are sowing doubt in the mind of indepedent voter's who may go to Biden. If they keep this shit up they are going to hand the W.H. to that bastard Trump on a silver platter.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)mcar
(46,056 posts)Why?
RubyRose
(319 posts)FBaggins
(28,706 posts)But that doesn't mean that it would be automatic... or pretty.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)That is why some people want to talk about it.
SoFlaBro
(3,790 posts)valleyrogue
(2,715 posts)I couldn't care less what he has to say.
SoFlaBro
(3,790 posts)viva la
(4,598 posts)for...Kimberly Guilfoyle's ex?
SoFlaBro
(3,790 posts)valleyrogue
(2,715 posts)The PTB think she is way easier for their darling Trump to beat. It has less to do with the fact she is Black than the fact she is a woman. Even now, millions of people will not vote for a woman president because, well, women can't lead due to their "hormones." This despite the fact women have been leading countries and empires for thousands of years with no problems, if you include monarchies in the mix.
Model35mech
(2,047 posts)Thankfully the DNC isn't saddled with THAT problem, yet.
But, consider what many people would think if the DNC/superdelegates went around her. She got denied because she was too much or not enough --of what-? The pundits explaining with the most obvious things- black, and woman- would be a terrible thing.
She's clearly been considered good enough to take his place if he dies, but some people seem to want un-named others to have the opportunity run more than her.
That will be a very massive cock-up and imo would tear alliances within the Democratic Party and its voters apart.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Kamala is great.
I believe the vice spot should be voted in.
It is too easy to get a less than stellar person in the vice spot because most people only consider the top of the ticket when voting.
I remember Perot's vice pick. Totally terrible, in my opinion, but it did little to change the vote.
Model35mech
(2,047 posts)not a coronation, but definitely not up to every convention delegate and not at all something that will come to rank and file Dem voters.
My understanding is that process uses senior party members and superdelegates to pick the replacement.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)If she were nominated at the convention, she would be able to choose her own running mate, as usual-- presuming that the convention delegates would vote for her choice, as usual, in the Vice Presidential nomination balloting.
(Well, actually she could name one before being nominated officially-- there's nothing to prevent that.)
If either the presidential or vice presidential slot became vacant after the convention,
then the members of the Democratic National Committee would choose a replacement.
(The Vice Presidential nominee does not become the presidential nominee, unless the DNC voted as such).
However, if the presidential candidate was elected, and died between the election and the inauguration,
the Vice-President elect would be sworn in as president.
(We had long discussions about all this a few months back, and looked to the party rules about it.)
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)Stockdale was a Navy Academy grad, he earned a Congressional Medal of Honor for his service in Viet Nam, he was the leader of the prisoners held in the Hanoi Hilton, he was held for years in captivity, he came home became an academic after retiring as an Admiral. Unfortunately, he got on stage and had a bad night, remind you of anyone . Totally terrible, we should be so lucky. total hero.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Like if a car mechanic said, he is sharp, he is hitting on all cylinders.
He has a lot of horse power.
Shortly after I said that, Stockdale said, paraphrasing, "I'm out of ammunition, these guys know every nuance about this stuff"
It seemed Perot picked him mostly because he was a war hero, not because he was a great choice.
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)He did not plan on him
Actually being on the ticket but needed someone. Stockdale is an American Hero.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)The anecdote is a highlight of my life, so I wanted to share it with you.
John1956PA
(4,964 posts). . . that Perot's V.P. pick (Admiral Stockdale) was a very good man for the job, but that Admiral Stockdale committed "the unpardonable sin of looking bad on television."
It should be pointed out that Perot selected Admiral Stockdale as an "interim" choice in order to meet the requirement (of many states) of having two candidates on a ticket. Perot's plan was that, if he advanced in the campaign, he would adjust his V.P. pick sometime in the summer of 1992. Because of Perot's dropping out and re-entering the race, Admiral Stockdale was on the Perot Independent ticket in November 1992.
I am not judging whether or not Admiral Stockdale was V.P. material, although he did have an impressive military record. Also, he had a hearing impairment which resulted from being tortured by his captors in the Viet Nam War. That hearing impairment, along with his lack of debating experience, worked against him in the 1992 V.P. debate.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Like if a car mechanic said, he is sharp, he is hitting on all cylinders.
He has a lot of horse power.
Shortly after I said that, Stockdale said, paraphrasing, "I'm out of ammunition, these guys know every nuance about this stuff"
It seemed Perot picked him mostly because he was a war hero, not because he was a great choice.
John1956PA
(4,964 posts)I included the angle that the pick was meant to be of an *interim* nature.
Thanks for your reply. You and I were certainly two political junkies of that era.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)I understood the comedy and I understand the hero part.
I didn't know about the interim.
But the anecdote is a highlight of my life, so I wanted to share it with you.
John1956PA
(4,964 posts)The "out of ammunition" remark is something which I had no knowledge of. When you mentioned it in a previous post, I was surprised that I had no recollection of it.
The *interim* designation may have been somewhat facetious on the part of Perot and Stockdale. I do not think that either of them thought that the campaign would develop legs.
Perot dropped out in June 1992 and re-entered on October 1, 1992, with Stockdale, again, as his running mate. Perot and his explanations were flaky. He had said that he dropped out because he did not want to send the election to the House, then later he said it was because of some type of threat to disrupt his daughter's wedding.
The legacy of Admiral Stockdale remains one of respect by those who have read about his career. Before his service in the Vietnam War, he evolved from a military strategist to a philosopher. After the Gulf of Tonkin lies which our government propogated, he accepted the reality that sometimes governnent and military take a devious course, but there is no way an armed forces service member can change the big picture in that moment. Years later, he sought to liberalize policy when he was president of The Citadel, and he was pushed out for his efforts. I think that he would have made an excellent presidential advisor.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)But it dont mean a thing.
valleyrogue
(2,715 posts)but we have Hillary Clinton's candidacy to look back on. It was pure sexism at work. It would be a debacle for Dems to nominate somebody over Harris if Biden did the impossible and step aside. That is saying "no confidence."
I can't believe anybody is peddling Gavin Newsom. He is a lightning rod for the MAGAs.
And cant she pick Biden as VP? Sort of as a fuck you to detractors. Any reason why she cant do that? Wed have the same talent mix as we have now.
budkin
(6,849 posts)Is what I heard.
valleyrogue
(2,715 posts)Newsom is tainted simply by being from California, just as VP Harris would be as presidential nominee. The Golden State is a lightning rod for red meat to the MAGAs and others.
Whitmer has no national following to be elected nationwide.
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)I get that nobody here wants to change horses and I dont either, but its not necessary to take it out on other Dem pols. The California thing is just beyond silly, and no, I dont live in California.
Magas dont like California? In other news, water is wet. Also: Who gives a shit if they dont like it. Imagine caring about that. Imagine selecting future nominees based on what Magas like. No thanks. 🙄
Ontheboundry
(306 posts)Gavin's appeal in the Midwest is really low. Biden is from Pennsylvania, and that appeals to the core of Midwestern folks,.specifically the independent/moderates
Gavin however is something else. I saw that poll,.and he was way under in the Midwest compared to Biden
yorkster
(3,832 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)But is the US ready for a female president?
MistakenLamb
(791 posts)I would rather lose with Kamala Harris than replace her with a white man or woman and still lose. You don't get to betray black voters particularly black women voters by stepping over. That happens Trump wins over 300 electoral votes. That level of betrayal will be a death blow to the Democratic Party
Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)They will steal our democracy and burn it all down to get what they want.
The GOP will sell out our country to the highest bidder, and those bidders are our enemies.
So it matters a great deal how we handle this situation.
Our lives depend upon it.
It is not a time for delicate sensibilities and hurt feelings.
It is time to be in it to win it.
MistakenLamb
(791 posts)I don't give a goddamn about GOPutin or whatever needing a white man on top if not Biden, you saying that is saying you take. black women the most loyal voting base for the Democratic Party. Kamala Harris is the best chance to beat Trump after Biden, period. Run anyone else Trump will win over 300 Electroral votes
bucolic_frolic
(55,140 posts)Gretch and Gavin
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)to wonder if a woman can win at this moment. I hope so. Shit a major publication just said that Taylor swift was a bad role model because she was unmarried at 34 and childless. Fuck that.
doc03
(39,086 posts)louis-t
(24,618 posts)The contrast would be really stark. A hobbling, old, orange creature or a young, energetic leader.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)A kind, decent, highly effective president vs a convicted felon who lies.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)
:largelouis-t
(24,618 posts)I'll get an ulcer if Biden stays in. Much as I love the guy, they're beating the hell out of him with "Disaster" reports about the debate..
Blue Cape
(351 posts)Mark Kelly.
Attilatheblond
(8,877 posts)Just NO
whathehell
(30,468 posts)Just WHAT?
Attilatheblond
(8,877 posts)He is not the best campaigner however. And we need our senators IN THE SENATE right now. I say this as an AZ voter. Leave him in the senate. We worked bloody hard to get him there and DEMs need him there.
whathehell
(30,468 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)Blue Cape
(351 posts)In today's world, he's good to run.
Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)That is the purpose of the primaries.
To determine who has the stomach to run a presidential campaign.
Azathoth
(4,677 posts)Dozens of other potentials. We're a pretty big freakin party.
This idea that somehow 81-year-old Joe is the only Democrat capable of taking on Trump is beyond insane.
Response to Azathoth (Reply #21)
Blue Cape This message was self-deleted by its author.
Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)The big issue is the time frame. If it was a year ago it would be a different story.
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)There are plenty to put under VP Harris, but knocking her off is tough. Maybe get Justice Sotomayor to step down and put the VP on the Court for life lets you start with a clean slate.
Attilatheblond
(8,877 posts)their fucking pony. Reality is not something some people grasp.
LeftInTX
(34,294 posts)NickB79
(20,356 posts)Biden can't simply hand over the millions in this campaign coffers.
It's stupid at this point to even discuss it
Attilatheblond
(8,877 posts)It IS a stupid point and not worth discussion. Stupid, to the point of nearly suspicious IMHO.
Blue Cape
(351 posts)poster is acting suspiciously?
But I thought high post count was the infallible way to show if someone "truly belonged" here?
Note: I don't think the OP is being suspicious. And paranoia is an awful companion.
Attilatheblond
(8,877 posts)It is the idea which is suspicious, not unlike a lot of that is pushed by main stream media lately.
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)The whole thing stinks not the OP!
Response to NickB79 (Reply #24)
Blue Cape This message was self-deleted by its author.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)True Dough
(26,667 posts)(and I think Michelle Obama would kick some butt), the right-wing nutjobs would say, "See! See! This was all a set up to get her in power." Some of them have been espousing that conspiracy theory for years.
But if would be worth having them say, "I told you so," if she could become the president.
Blue Cape
(351 posts)unequivocally steadfast in her disinterest in elective politics, and has never wavered on that subject.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)If Trump wins, her husband could be thrown in jail. Thats pretty motivating.. right?
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)Princeton, Harvard Law, really fucking smart but qualifications for POTUS are pretty thin.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)However we are in a crisis situation and she might change her mind given the situation. She must realize that if Trump wins, her husband could very possibly be jailed.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)The media (and some here) are trying ti manufacture a crisis situation.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)who has no interest in being president. Sounds like a fine idea indeed.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)All that matters in winning in November.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)The one that UOU and the media are pretending we are in?
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)You are in serious denial if you dont see it.
True Dough
(26,667 posts)If you read carefully, you'd notice that the poster before me brought up the idea and I expanded upon the speculation with "IF that ever happened..."
Have a good evening!
Goodheart
(5,760 posts)but my favorite politician is Pete Butegieg.... who I believe is the most intelligent and sharpest guy around.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Funtatlaguy
(11,878 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)Yeah, uh, no.
roamer65
(37,953 posts)Period.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)roamer65
(37,953 posts)If their pledged candidate is no longer available, they are then free to support whatever candidate they choose. The convention then goes into rounds of voting until a majority candidate emerges. It would make for some great TV.
Thats representative democracy.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)And yea, such a scenario would make for an entertaining TV viewing, but I fail to see how it would result in united party.
roamer65
(37,953 posts)More than likely will be the nominee for the general election.
But the party could nominate cream cheese for the November general and I would vote for it over that scumsucking dengerate Dump.
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)If Biden gets elected, Harris WILL be the VP and by extension if, in the absolute worst case scenario, Biden dies in office. This is a scenario that all too many in the pundit circle (and I"m noticing most of them fall into the "paid professional voice" category) want to avoid at all costs. This has been at the foundation of the "Biden is too old" argument from the beginning - not his age or his capabilities, but the possibility that we could have a President Kamala Harris.
Biden's fine. Harris is competent, not necessarily the absolute best choice, but a great choice nonetheless. Those calling for Biden's ouster at this point mainly have other axes to grind, and should be viewed accordingly.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)Harris is already a VP.
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)if age DOES become an issue (and I trust him to know when that is). At that point, Harris will be President.
I've long had a feeling that Biden may actually do JUST that - get elected, spend the next couple of years securing things, then hand the reins off to Harris and retire in 2026. It would be just the kick in the seat of the pants that the Magats need, as they would be facing Madame President in 2028, not VP Harris. This carries a LOT more weight, Biden leaves on a high note, and the GOP, with a seriously decomposing Trump at that point, are forced to deal with an incumbent president.
Bwa-ha-ha!
roamer65
(37,953 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)Then the Dem primary season will be a raucous hoot, with Newsom, Whitmer, Harris, and who knows who else? It will be a time of much spirited discussion on DU.
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)However, I can see the above scenario play out if there was an actual crisis with Biden.
Keep in mind, I doubt that the age aspect would be that critical if Trump was in fact in full compos mentos. Both Democrats and Republicans have had Presidents who were disabled for part of their term - Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke in 1919 that left him paralyzed and hospitalized, with Edith Wilson effectively stepping in as de facto president. Franklin Delano Rooseveldt, had health problems all his life, and ultimately died of a stroke at the fairly young age of 63, Reagan had Alzheimers throughout much of his second term. Biden is, by all indications, remarkably fit for someone in his 80s, and I suspect that while he's probably on the same kind of regimen of heart medications that I am, he has a good chance of living to 100.
Let's also talk about Trump. The man has lost a lot of weight, likely through Ozembic, which likely has placed significant stress on his heart, he likely has one or more STDs, has high arterial build-up from a poor diet, has had a fairly extreme case of Covid, and is under a huge amount of stress right now. Take away the spray tan and hair coloring (and extensions), he looks like an old man in his 90s. Moreover, he has a family history of demantia and Alzheimers, and is presenting more and more signs that this is accelerating. The GOP is not going to replace Donald Trump - not now that he has his claws in the organization.
There's a lot of projection going on in the media right now, deliberately NOT looking at how ill Trump is by turning this into a debate about Biden's age, and one bad outing (it happens, especially if you are dealing with a demanding schedule) should not be sufficient reason to have him step aside. Frankly, I think the media's going to try to fan the flames as much as they can, but Biden's continued strong showing AFTER the debate is making that much harder to do convincingly.
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)the usual dem suspects who should be supporting Biden. At least they
don't have to help tRump by attacking Biden's performance.
What a gift to the GOP.
It's crazy because they should know there's no way Biden can step aside.
Torchlight
(6,830 posts)People can moan, whine, complain. jerk knees, and yell about falling skies, but it changes absolutely nothing (other than theor own blood pressure perhaps).
Pres Biden is our candidate to run for reelection in Nov. 2024; everything else is at best a distraction, and at worst, more Russian disinformation finding a wearm home in the lowest common denominaotrs of the political game.
roamer65
(37,953 posts)But there are no guarantees in life. Many thought that John Kennedy would be a two term president, sadly.
God rest his soul.
Buckeyeblue
(6,352 posts)But if Biden decided to drop out, then it would have to be Harris. Then backfill the VP with a governor from a Great Lakes state.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)Except now he's anglo-saxon and 6 foot 5 inches tall!
Also, he's a multi-billionaire who can spend more of his own money on his campaign than Biden and Trump put together...
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)nt
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)in the now-forgotten TV series from about the late 1970s through the early 1980s--
"Fantasy Island" (ABC)
And my reference to that old TV series will serve as my assertion
that those who are proposing a 'replacement candidate' for President Biden
must be residents of 'Fantasy Island'....
"Tutu" was played by what we used to call a "midget" or a "dwarf"--
(I am not sure what the politically sensitive term would be nowadays, "small person" ?)
And in every episode when new guests were arriving to fulfill their fantasies,
he would run towards the airstrip screaming in his non-English accent,
"de plane, boss!! de plane!!!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantasy_Island
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)Way to much in fact.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)way back when.... but "da plane!" seemed to be the most attention-grabbing part of the whole show, lol
Polybius
(21,900 posts)Say what you want, but I love her.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)If any of those people begin to call for Biden to step down, they will move from my wish list to my shit list immediately.
Deep State Witch
(12,716 posts)They all seem to want Gavin Newsome. That's great, but Gavin has already said many times that he's not going to challenge Biden, and has a big enough job as Governor of CA.
DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)let's not tell Black voters "fuck you" when Trump is trotting out right wing blacks. However, Whitmer might be a good choice for VP as it could get her her "national level" wings.
Of course, the people whop want Biden out are the same idiots who were hoping Bernie was in ..yeah cenk ugyur, I am looking at YOU.
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)Cenk used to have his own show on MSNBC if memory serves.
The supposed progressive voice. Remember Ed whats his name oh Schulz. Went on to work for RTV.
Deek1935
(1,055 posts)flamingdem
(40,891 posts)pumping the idea?
It's curious. Usually they know the nuts and bolts of presidential elections.
It cannot be done and they (should) know this.