General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoe told the First Lady he didn't feel well.
After last nights debate, he said, You know, Jill, I dont know what happened. I didnt feel that great, she recounted. And I said, Look, Joe, we are not going to let 90 minutes define the four years that youve been president.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/30/how-biden-debate-prep-led-to-damaging-event/
PeaceWave
(2,838 posts)The reason they call him "off night" is that everyone whom he guards seems to have an "off night." At some point, we need to acknowledge that everyone who debates Trump is going to have an off night. The reason, of course, is that the man makes up the rules as he goes along. Unfortunately, I think his existence may have forever changed what is deemed acceptable behavior among politicians - certainly among the GOP. Debates will never be the same.
BlueTsunami2018
(4,918 posts)Nor did Joe last time around.
Thats not an excuse.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)I think every answer that Joe gives should be Rhis debate is a farce because the other man on the stage says nothing but lies. Here is the truth .
andym
(6,053 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 1, 2024, 02:34 AM - Edit history (2)
nearly well enough. He seemed caught between trying to tell Bidenesque stories he prepared and responding to the barrage of Trump's lies. That really threw him off. [I read truncated version of the article at first, in reality Biden was well prepared, he just was not "on"]
MichMan
(16,902 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)He was prepared with answers to the lies Trump told - and failed to deliver them.
So aides were bewildered by his performance. Many felt they had never seen him collapse so dramatically. After all, Biden was a veteran of numerous debates as a senator, vice-presidential nominee and presidential candidate. And they did not understand why he gave an entirely different answer on the age question than the one they spent more than a week perfecting.
andym
(6,053 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 30, 2024, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Overprepared with too many answers is certainly possible. Time of day is probably the most important as it said he "flagged" in the evening. Very difficult to fight circadian rhythms. But maybe he needs to take a nap before the debate.
Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)It's not fun, and in my experience they can't be changed (despite the significant shaming directed at night people). But it's not that hard to be functional - I've been doing it all my life.
My normal sleep cycle is falling asleep sometime between 2 and 4 AM and waking between 10 AM and noon. I taught high school for 11 years and was in my classroom by 7 AM, fully functional 5 days a week. On weekends - and in the summers - I reverted to my body's preferred schedule. Next semester I'll be in the classroom at 7:45 AM two days a week. I won't like it - but I won't have the kinds of difficulties I observed on Thursday evening.
murielm99
(32,843 posts)I worked, but I spent a lifetime adjusting to my work schedule.
andym
(6,053 posts)How that impacts someone who is traditionally a night person like yourself is uncertain. However, it suggests that Joe Biden would do better with an afternoon debate. Perhaps he should go on a two-week Hawaiian vacation before the next debate, so early evening will seem like early afternoon to him.
Evidence:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067093/#:~:text=Older%20adults'%20peak%20performance%20on,to%20be%20in%20the%20afternoon.
Look Out Its Your Off-Peak Time of Day! Time of Day Matters More for Alerting than for Orienting or Executive Attention
Marisa Knight and Mara Mather
Exp Aging Res. 2013; 39(3): 305321.
Abstract
Background
Older adults peak performance on memory and cognitive inhibition tasks tends to be in the morning while younger adults peak performance tends to be in the afternoon. Although these tasks require efficient attentional processes for optimal performance, previous research examining age differences in the effects of time of day has not measured the distinct aspects of attention quantified by the attentional network test (ANT; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, & Posner, 2002).
Methods
We examined the relationship between time of testing and the efficiency of alerting, orienting and executive attention networks by randomly assigning younger (1828 years; N = 27, M = 21.37 years, SD = 2.39) and older adults (6585 years; N = 32, M = 73.34 years, SD = 5.18) to AM or PM testing of alerting, orienting and executive attention. Mean reaction times for each network was analyzed with a univariate ANOVA with age (younger, older) and time of day (AM, PM) as between-subjects factors.
Results
Consistent with our hypotheses, while time of day had little effect on orienting or executive attention, it affected alerting in opposite ways for younger and older adults, with alerting cues benefitting performance most at participants off-peak times of day. A larger benefit from alerting cues was observed when participants were tested at their off-peak (M = 30.11 ± 15.66) relative to their peak time (M = 2.18 ± 15.97).
Conclusion
Our findings show that age-related circadian patterns influence the alerting component of attention, with both age groups showing the largest benefit from alerting cues when testing occurs at non-optimal times of day. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of controlling for time of day in investigations of attention and add to our understanding of how age differences in circadian patterns impact attention.
Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)to account for the difference.
For example:
Did they account for normal sleep patterns. A disproportionate number of early birds in the older population compared to the younger population could easily show up the same way.
Did they account for sundowning. An elderly population is more likely to include people with dementia (at all stages) than the younger population - and afternoon decline is a known symptom of dementia. (They did administer the same test Trump has passed twice . . . so it clearly isn't a sufficient test to rule out anything more than very advanced dementia.)
Without a more rigorous exploration of factors, other than age, that would account for the difference it is just as much nonsense as the assertion that people who are still in bed at 11 AM are lazy.
This is an issue I've been fighting my entire life - not just personally, but professionally. That includes my most recent job where my boss was a morning person and had embedded morning person prejudices about when and how to study in study guides she had designed for all students. This highly educated person actually believed - as fact - all of the myths, until she worked with me (an objectively better student) and was finally able to start setting them aside.
andym
(6,053 posts)"All older individuals were screened in a phone interview for dementia using a version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975).2 "
The whole article is available at the link.
The sleep patterns should average out among the groups given the size of the study. However, given that older people tend to have less sleep than younger folks, it would be useful to document not only morning vs evening folks but the role of total amount of sleep.
Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)I read the article.
Trump passed that test twice. As does my spouse, regularly, despite taking two Alzheimer's medications for more than a decade. That test only rules out significantly advanced dementia
The study participants were self-selected, which means no assumptions can be made about whether the sleep patterns would average out.
The idea that older people tend to have less sleep than younger folks is also nonsense. At 67, I'm sleeping more than I've ever slept. At 92, both of my mother are sleeping more than they ever had - my mother at night; my father spread out over the day and night. Those 3 data points don't prove anything any more than a truism that older people tend to have less sleep than younger people does.
It would certainly be appropriate to include data about amount of sleep in the study - to help sort out more accurate and specific correlations, but the fact is that they used age alone as a stand in for a whole bunch of other factors that are just as likely, if not more, to influence peak mental acuity.
forthemiddle
(1,459 posts)More than anything I hope this time of day explanation doesnt become the bad night excuse of the day.
I can already see the campaign ads.
Does America really need a President that cant perform when he has a cold, or if its too late at night.
Im beginning to think that the best case for President Biden is at least hes not Trump.
tinrobot
(11,998 posts)It wasn't anything Trump said or did. Biden was just... off.
I'm sure he was prepared, because he did have most of the answers. He just delivered them poorly, particularly at the start.
dlk
(13,195 posts)They didn't do their jobs and too many are jumping on the "blame Biden" bandwagon. CNN has declined to the point where it is unwatchable.
Skittles
(170,282 posts)shouldn't that have been a requirement for participating in the debate? Trump is a compulsive liar.
dlk
(13,195 posts)The answer is crystal clear and it wasn't about enlightening, and educating American voters.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)They called the day of the debate. They agreed to the network and moderators. They didn't ask for "fact-checking" WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN A PART OF PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES.
Skittles
(170,282 posts)it makes no sense to me
MichMan
(16,902 posts)LisaL
(47,367 posts)WTF was the logic behind it?
womanofthehills
(10,750 posts)to fact check each other.
Skittles
(170,282 posts)seriously, this was no "debate"
Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)Each party must not only be able to make their points, but to call their opponents out when they mistake or misuse facts. It is not, in any debate format in familiar with, the job l of the moderator.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)Being a network you are responsible for the content going out on your broadcast.
Allowing lies to be spouted constantly should have some backlash. Even if only from the viewers. So I guess to me I am unsure why you are ok with lies being broadcast to millions of people over and over again. No e of us seem to like or watch Fox because of this but for some reason we are supposed to be ok with it in a debate?
Ms. Toad
(38,419 posts)That's how debates work.
It has nothing to do with whether I'm OK with lies being broadcast. When they agreed to debate on live TV, and Trump was a participant, broadcasting lies was a given. If that wasn't acceptable to Biden's team, they should have insisted on a different format.
Evolve Dammit
(21,622 posts)MacKasey
(1,501 posts)Made from local elderberries
I go to local health food store and get a bottle made in next town over
That would strengthen our his throat!
wendyb-NC
(4,641 posts)I give it to my sons, who are grown and on their own, as holiday gifts. Great stuff, clears the respiratory tract. I use grain alcohol to steep tthe elderberries and herbs, to steep in for a few weeks, during the lunar cycle. It makes a potent cordial., or it can be diluted with hot water, and enjoyed like tea.
orangecrush
(29,439 posts)If there is more here than meets the eye.
highplainsdem
(60,895 posts)but wear off quickly?
orangecrush
(29,439 posts)ElementaryPenguin
(7,903 posts)I don't care if we sound as conspiratorial as the MAGAs - we're fools if we think they wouldn't resort to that - considering the tremendous stakes (and the MAGAs absolute absence of morals)!
ClickClack
(88 posts)Perception counts, regardless of how much we wish it were not so.
- Yes, Narcissyphilis spouted a torrent of lies.
- Yes, CNN's moderators should have called him out on those lies,
and they deserve all the scorn they are getting for failing to do that.
- Yes, President Biden may very well have just had a bad night.
- Yes, perhaps he was briefly suffering from some malady that affected his energy,
his appearance, his voice, his facial expressions, his body language, his clarity of thought,
his ability to strategize..... and so on and so forth.
None of that changes the fact that his campaign asked for this early debate, prepared for a week, and we still had the presentation we witnessed. I am terrified that this debate and the impression President Biden made will hurt his chance and that Bronzed Blowhard Convicted Felon will get back in the White House. That CANNOT happen. I have tremendous respect for Biden and his career in government. However, I also am a realist and I can envision voters doubting his ability to serve effectively for another 4 years. I wish it were not so, but wishing will not change things.
Prairie Gates
(7,580 posts)MartyTheGreek
(731 posts)S.S. should go back source and look at all his meals and drinks!
We know magats were devastated by his SOTU address. Joe should just state what he's done over the past 4 years and point to Trump and say they are all lies. No time to address his lies, just go over and over his accomplishments and just say Trump is lying again.
He should not walk with his mouth open and he should get on a stepper and pump up those calf's and glutes 20 min a day. Maybe have an expresso before the next debate. Some B-12 for energy!
RussBLib
(10,467 posts)...nothing about Trump surprises me anymore. He is capable of anything, and one of his best buds is one Vladimir Putin, whose opponents just keep falling out of windows and getting poisoned.
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
orangecrush
(29,439 posts)And thanks for your concern.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)I'm 70 and despite using a rider mower instead of a push mower I threw up several times.
I recovered in about thirty minutes.
Raven123
(7,666 posts)Prairie Gates
(7,580 posts)Just to be clear. If he told Jill Friday night...
texasfiddler
(2,199 posts)GOP will do anything for us to question our candidate. Not that they need to do anything. I love Democrats because we are fee thinkers. We dont blindly follow our leader. There is a negative however. 2016
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)I assume Bidens and advisors know whether it was an aberration or something else. If they assess situation objectively, Im in on plan. Of course, if they say screw you Ill still vote for Biden.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)"Something wrong, not feeling great", leading to confusion, looking dazed and having difficulty communicating, would be a real concern for any President, especially in his 80's. They're not telling us something.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,729 posts)Progressive dog
(7,588 posts)we have to understand the stakes here. TSF brought us a supreme court that rewrites the Constitution to protect Trump and offers him immunity now and for a second term.
I can't imagine what the psychopath would accomplish in a second term, and I don't think anyone who believes in human rights, equality, or even basic decency wants to find out.
We have only two options, Trump or Biden and pretending otherwise helps Trump.
I stand with Joe and his accomplishments, and his appointments, and his platform, and his vice President. I don't want to see this crap stay in the news and it won't. There are a hell of a lot more important things going on.
