General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow in the hell can THIS SC decide what evidemnce is alllowed?
Arn't they OVERSTEPPING it's authority?
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)bluestarone
(22,179 posts)Because of THIS SC overstepping authority?
republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)ScratchCat
(2,740 posts)It seems they are just making stuff up out of thin air. I don't see any type of authority to make such a proclamation. The intent is clearly to prevent the fact that Trump was told by his cabinet that a)he didn't win and b)he was likely violating the law from being used in the trial. Again, they just invented something and gave themselves power over evidence.
agingdem
(8,849 posts)pass the buck to the district court...
NoRethugFriends
(3,753 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)And they make sure we know it.
They can do whatever the hell they want.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)They've said nothing about evidence. They responded to a lawsuit about the CHARGES made by Jack Smith.
bluestarone
(22,179 posts)If they did, how can they tie the prosecutors hands BEFORE trial? (Am i not understanding this?)
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)"... Also not relevant to the assessment on official versus unofficial conduct, the high court said, is the fact that an action would have allegedly violated a generally applicable law..."
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,869 posts)I am still reading the opinion (it is hard because I keep getting mad). This flowchart purports to outline the effects of the decision on the prosecution of TFG.
If this is accurate, there can be a prosecution of TFG
Link to tweet
We created this infographic
@just_security
to explain:
- the pathways open to Jack Smith
- the scope of immunity from prosecution for all future presidents

TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)essentially do anything that physics allows.