Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raven123

(7,260 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:16 PM Jul 2024

Doesn't the SCOTUS ruling make the documents case more important?

If TFG took those documents after he left office, he was no longer POTUS and therefore is not immune. I wonder what Jack Smith is thinking.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RockRaven

(18,243 posts)
1. Nothing is going to happen in the document case as long as Loose Cannon
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:19 PM
Jul 2024

has control over it, so it really doesn't matter.

Mr.WeRP

(1,011 posts)
2. Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion that the appointment of Jack Smith was illegal...
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:21 PM
Jul 2024

He is telling Cannon to make the decision that the case is invalid due to this; Smith will appeal and it will go up to the Supreme Court. How do you think they will rule?

Mr.WeRP

(1,011 posts)
6. Just saying what happened
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:27 PM
Jul 2024
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-jack-smith-supreme-court-ruling-donald-trump-immunity-1919643

He gave implicit instructions to Cannon in his concurring opinion. It would not surprise me to see this court overturn one of its prior rulings.
 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
4. It makes the election critical. Nothing else matters. Either we win the WH and Congress or our Country is gone.
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:24 PM
Jul 2024

Silent Type

(11,851 posts)
5. I bet he took records before leaving office. But that was illegal, so don't think ruling
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:27 PM
Jul 2024

makes much difference (except for BS motions trump's lawyers file using the initial confusion over it).

I guess Cannon will have to make a formal ruling, which will be a slow process for her and I suppose -- if she is fully in the tank for trump -- she could rule it's an "official act." That would surely be appealed.

None of these cases were going to trial before the election, anyway. We still need to beat trump at polls, and quit praying court proceedings somehow spare us.

Raven123

(7,260 posts)
7. Please don't get me wrong
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 04:44 PM
Jul 2024

I have no delusions about the courts. Given the ruling, I just wonder if Smith’s team will shift gears. They will have to re-evaluate the J6 case. I just thought the documents case would percolate to the top if indeed TFG’s crimes occurred after he left office. And some did.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Doesn't the SCOTUS ruling...