Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump attorney argues 'fake electors' scheme was an 'official act'
Trump attorney argues fake electors scheme was an official actAn attorney for former President Trump suggested the so-called fake electors scheme qualifies as an official act, which would prevent it from being prosecuted under the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
Trump attorney Will Scharf told CNN Monday night that some acts alleged in the former presidents federal election subversion indictment do constitute private conduct but the effort to put forth slates of alternate electors in 2020 from key battleground states is not one of them.
We believe the assembly of those alternate slates of electors was an official act of the presidency, Scharf said, noting the Supreme Court left that question for lower courts to decide.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from criminal prosecution and that presidents are presumptively entitled to immunity for all official acts. They do not enjoy immunity for unofficial, or private, actions, the high court said.
Trump attorney Will Scharf told CNN Monday night that some acts alleged in the former presidents federal election subversion indictment do constitute private conduct but the effort to put forth slates of alternate electors in 2020 from key battleground states is not one of them.
We believe the assembly of those alternate slates of electors was an official act of the presidency, Scharf said, noting the Supreme Court left that question for lower courts to decide.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from criminal prosecution and that presidents are presumptively entitled to immunity for all official acts. They do not enjoy immunity for unofficial, or private, actions, the high court said.
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump attorney argues 'fake electors' scheme was an 'official act' (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Jul 2024
OP
It usurped the Constitution and the electorial college duly elected electors
Historic NY
Jul 2024
#5
So, now they are admitting that Trump was in charge of the 'fake electors' scheme.
keithbvadu2
Jul 2024
#8
no_hypocrisy
(54,906 posts)1. While Trump WAS President when he concocted and implemented the
Fake Electors Scheme, I fail to see this as part of presidential acts/duties in furtherance of benefitting the country.
badhair77
(5,181 posts)2. They think we are all stupid if they expect
us to believe that.
Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)3. We don't have to believe it or not.
The SC makes the decision.
Bettie
(19,704 posts)4. They only have to get six people
to believe or pretend to believe it.
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)5. It usurped the Constitution and the electorial college duly elected electors
bluestarone
(22,178 posts)6. The ONLY ones that will believe this BULLSHIT is
THIS Supreme Court.
shrike3
(5,370 posts)7. Of course he does.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)8. So, now they are admitting that Trump was in charge of the 'fake electors' scheme.
Proclaiming it, even.