If they don't want Joe Biden, who the 'F' do they want. They should put up or shut up.

[Hotler]

Maybe I missed the announcement of their candidate.

[Peacetrain]

1. That is what I want to know too...

[LisaL]

2. It's very unlikely that they even have the same candidate in mind.

NT

[Johonny]

3. I assume Trump

Because that's who they're going to get after dividing the party like this.

[Deuxcents]

5. Yep.

[Johonny]

8. The worst part is

These smug people will be sitting there the day after the election going see I told you so when it was their fing fault.

I hope more than ever Biden wins. Not only to stick it to MAGA, but to stick to these entitled smug elitists.

[imabeliever]

4. Amen

The spineless democrats that have been suckered by the media into trying to push President Biden out of office will not be forgotten, at least by me.

I'm old enough to remember Chicago in 1968 and the Democratic Convention, these people are just asking for a loss! Even my own senator, Sherrod Brown, has gone soft and this shocks me!

Shameful!

[gab13by13]

6. Same for Nancy Pelosi?

[LetMyPeopleVote]

16. Welcome to DU

[Freethinker65]

7. They have no one, and no one to blame but themselves

They had most of the first term to promote upcoming leaders. Were they too lazy to come up with a plan B? If so, they should have allowed VP Harris to share the spotlight more often. I know she is extremely competent and qualified and has been hard at work these past years, but she has been underutilized in the public sphere.

Biden and Harris, and the entire administration, need to be seen as a team working together for the American people.

[gab13by13]

9. Harris has been campaigning regularly, she was just to Las Vegas.

She has been getting big crowds.

My daughter is a CFO and she overheard some investors talking about how they liked Kamala.

[LisaL]

10. Yea sure they like her.

Are they going to dump her as a hot potato if she doesn't do well in polls?

[Freethinker65]

12. Agree. But VP Harris should have been more publicly active prior to campaign

If anyone was considering a possible future change at the top of the ticket.

[dutch777]

11. This has been my criticism as well. If there's a Dem clearly more able to win than Biden, please advise. Michelle is..

...unavailable. Next?

[bigtree]

13. that's right

...and I missed them asking for voter's permission to undo their choice in this election.

[Bettie]

20. I get the feeling that for some of the guys we're talking about

they want to go to a back room selection process, where the voters don't come into it at all.

They certainly don't seem to care what the people who voted in the primaries think. They are ready to take our votes and toss them.

[LostOne4Ever]

14. That is one (of MANY) problems with their argument

They all want a different person to be the replacement.

The result is a repeat of the chaos from 1968!!! A brokered convention with lots of people angry their guy didn’t win and holding Grudges! It makes us look disorganized and utterly unprepared to lead!!!!

Remember what happened to Humphrey? How he almost lost every state in the union?

No no no no!!!!

Biden/Harris is the ONLY ticket that can win now!!!

[Wingus Dingus]

15. No one else is going to be (publicly) considered or offered for the nomination

until Biden agrees to withdraw from the race and things start moving in that direction. Not even Kamala Harris. That would be bad form. That's what I would expect, anyway.

[democrattotheend]

17. I'd be pretty excited to vote for Kamala if that is the option

But I'm 100% behind Biden if he does stay in. Either way I'll be proud to vote for our party's nominee.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

22. I agree.

[tavernier]

18. It's like herding cats.

Sadly, we are known for this.

[OldBaldy1701E]

21. Yup. (n/t)

[Bettie]

19. AND how they are going to ensure that their shiny new candidate

will be on the ballot in all 50 states and have enough money to run...but, crickets.