"Something 'FISHY And Suspicious' About Trump Assassination Attempt" Says Security Expert
I have no knowledge of the reliability and accuracy of the YouTube channel nor its guest, international security expert Will Geddes.
We need to wait for the results of the investigation to be made public.
Transcript:
0:00 Really, really interesting to wonder where this is going to go.
0:05 Well, we'll get as is now ready he's an international security expert.
0:08 You may have just hope we will morning to you discussing how earth someone in such an obvious rooftop position with a clear line
0:18 of sight to the former president how an earth they weren't picked up on by the security services, how they
0:24 were able to get on the roof and mount a rifle in such vision and in such clear view of everyone
0:33 and get to the stage where
0:36 they can actually fire shots. It's it's a standing crystal, I'll be honest with
0:42 you there is something a little bit fishy about the situation because
0:46 ultimately when you're running the protection of a principle, one of the biggest concerns
0:52 that you will always have is if you're taking them into open spaces it could be out either seen,
0:59 promoting talking canvassing whatever it might
1:02 be that wherever you have that event, you want to lock it down and secure it as much as possible.
1:09 And the secret service that will be attached to to President Trump should
1:14 have got all of the highest positions, the overviews that there would
1:19 be of the event space covered and that's not only the spaces that they themselves can then observe everybody who may be
1:26 on the grounds, anybody you might be in the vicinity.
1:29 Anybody you might be as a priority.
1:34 But also on, but also on the city, but also on other rooftops in apartment windows in office windows.
1:40 So there's something a little bits, a little bit suspicious about this.
1:44 When you say suspicious what do you quite mean by that?
1:49 Well it really falls into one of two areas.
1:52 There is either incompetence in terms of the security planning
1:56 or collaboration or collusion in terms of enabling there to
2:01 be a vacuum, a void within the security that could be potentially
2:06 filled.
2:07 I hope it's not, I mean I hope it's neither to be absolutely honest with you
2:11 but at the moment is very difficult to draw any speculation as it's been either one or the other.
2:17 Is there any defence perhaps that the secret service
2:22 can complete on this because apparently it was outside of the perimeter of their remit if you like
2:30 that this shooter was on a roof quite far
2:32 way, apparently from this rally?
2:37 So is that anything they can say that perhaps they couldn't have a seat?
2:44 Not really.
2:45 I think again, I'm finding is really difficult for it to be a defensible position by the secret service unless there
2:53 was such a lapse or there were some breakdown of failure obviously by someone within the who said this down,
2:59 Chris I don't get any bomb.
3:00 I know and have some friends who were in the secret service and they
3:04 are incredibly competent and they're very well rehearsed and very well experienced having had numerous the terms,
3:11 assassination of terms and various different types against all the presidents.
3:16 know that they have their game plan very well set out but the concern is and I don't subscribe to a conspiracy theorist,
3:23 Chris.
3:23 You and I have known each other in a number of years when if you ever heard
3:26 me endorse a conspiracy theory but this is just very, very odd
3:31 that this open position and with rifles, whether it be something which is built to shoot
3:39 with a parabellum from a great distance, there are some serious questions to be asked
3:44 that you try and put your principal into a pocket of security that they
3:58 I know one of the biggest challenges as we've seen in the world where someone right next to the stage
4:03 of where they're talking.
4:05 I think I think we were losing you for just a moment.
4:11 Listen, what really interesting to get your update on this.
4:13 I think we're losing the connection a little bit there, so we'll leave it.
4:16 Thank you so much for telling us what you think of that.
4:22 Again, I don't over conspiracy theories much. I do a little bit, but not note.
4:27 But I can see where we're coming from on that because it is quite staggering.
4:34 If you look at some of the footage, it's quite staggering just the open space that this shooter was from.
4:42 And again, members of the crowd, there's interviews with the crowd off for saying we were pointing
4:46 because saying look, there's this guy over there about to shoot
4:50 at former President Trump, so it's quite staggering that this person was missed.
4:57 So, you know, gross incompetence or something more sinister?
5:00 Well those are going to be the kinds of that will be asked and they're the kinds of questions
5:05 that we will keep asking here on
5:07 talk in the next hour as we have Rich and Palace I yield.
= new reply since forum marked as read
You don't have to be in combat to know when someone's shooting at you. Trust me. You pick up someone is shooting at you really fast. Your butt puckers and everything! You don't need coaching to get down, not at all. Bullets whizzing by really do speak for themselves. When you hear them, they say, "DUCK!!!" 
I mean, who really knows about this sort of stuff. I have learned to just wait and see and often the first few days are meaningless. The FBI really does do great work. Most of the time. I know they have their detractors but for the most part the men and women who work there are amazing. They're too Republican by and large but all in all a great group of people. I, for one, am gonna give them some time to do the work. This has got to be crazy for them, imagine trying to figure this mess out with the entire world watching! They won't get any pressure from me right now. In a few days though, there are a lot of questions that need answering.
... and a piece of glass from the teleprompter flew up and dinged his ear.
Also I'm pretty sure those lecterns are designed to be bullet proof. The Secret Service would have trained Chump to dive behind the lectern if there's ever a threat. So he did it not because he fell down, it was a purposeful act.
"The Secret Service would have trained Chump..." 
That is the funniest thing I've read in days!
It looks cheap and cheesy with nobodies and their subscriber substacks and podcasts. 
