General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPost removed
Walleye
(33,789 posts)And how we even get there.
Elessar Zappa
(15,112 posts)Torchlight
(4,078 posts)have a better success rate than faith-based assertions. I'd love to see the data concluding better choices are available and should be made immediately, but no is supplying it.
BootinUp
(48,300 posts)Justify this. I dont give a rats ass what Schiff says. 4 months to go and Biden is arguably ahead. Someone tell Schiff to go work on increasing turnout in his state.
budkin
(6,849 posts)She was actually my first choice originally in 2019.
Response to Post removed (Original post)
Post removed
Silent Type
(5,410 posts)country in the ground since forever.
piddyprints
(14,734 posts)to put this issue to bed and get behind our candidate? The primaries are over. Joe Biden is our candidate.
LAS14
(14,220 posts)Isn't it? We don't have a nominee yet.
piddyprints
(14,734 posts)President Biden is our presumptive nominee.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,248 posts)piddyprints
(14,734 posts)BannonsLiver
(17,426 posts)Lower left corner of each post.
piddyprints
(14,734 posts)I thought perhaps a little common sense persuasion would be a better idea to start with. Clearly, I have failed.
Miami Blue
(138 posts)President Biden can even defeat
Traitor Trump here in Florida💪🏻
The naysayers' Democrats need to stop the
spread of the propaganda and falsehoods
broadcasted on the Media ASAP.
Squeaky41
(207 posts)I don't see a replacement pending and funding proposed.
unblock
(53,858 posts)How do you think gotv efforts will fare after the party gives a big f u to its members?
A ton of democrats will then sit it out or maybe vote for the brain worm guy as a protest.
Only two times has an incumbent party rejected the incumbent as nominee and managed to win with someone else: Buchanan and Garfield, both ancient history. And both of them had run vigorous and popular primary campaigns.
You want to hand the nomination to someone who merely maybe worked a back room deal and has zero campaign infrastructure or strategy or plan or personnel just 4 months before the election?
It will be an utter disaster.
Maybe someone else had a chance during primary season. But Biden won. Change horses mid stream and we will all drown.
lame54
(36,307 posts)democrattotheend
(12,006 posts)As his VP she seems like the obvious choice, but so many people seem hesitant about her and I am not sure why.
lame54
(36,307 posts)democrattotheend
(12,006 posts)I know I would be. I will be happy to vote for Biden again but would be just as happy to vote for Kamala at the top of the ticket.
lame54
(36,307 posts)Why waste precious time on this asinine argument
Plus they are jumping on this as a huge talking point
Why are we handing this to them
piddyprints
(14,734 posts)Think. Again.
(15,120 posts)Wh not just stick with Biden if you think he'll be unable to complete his term?
democrattotheend
(12,006 posts)I wish he had decided not to run again, which was his original plan (he strongly implied as much himself in his recent BET interview). He's done a great job and he deserves another term, but watching him over the past few weeks, I can't deny how much the presidency has aged him. I do believe he is still "all there" mentally, but he seems old and weak and unfortunately, perception is reality in American politics. I watched his interview with Lester Holt and his press conference and even though his answers were great on substance, he still just seemed old and tired and not nearly as sharp as he did in his debate against Paul Ryan in 2012 or even in the 2020 campaign. Most Democrats will still vote for him but they aren't excited about him (so may not turn out as much, donate as much, volunteer as much, etc.), and concerns about whether he will still be up for the job in four years will probably influence at least some swing voters.
On the other hand, I think switching candidates now is a big risk, especially if Biden does not go willingly, as it seems he won't. It would divide the party, especially since it seems that at least some influential people want to skip over the person we nominated four years ago to be his successor to the presidency. I think swapping out Biden with anyone but Kamala would be divisive, and while I personally would be really excited to vote for her, she seems to be not that popular either for reasons I don't understand. And she is far less well tested and experienced than Biden. I think there is a lot of risk but potentially more upside for a replacement candidate - higher ceiling but lower floor. It may be a risk worth taking if Biden's poll numbers don't increase in the next couple weeks. And make no mistake, being only 2 points down or even tied in the national polls is not good enough - he probably needs to win the national popular vote by at least 4 points to win the electoral college, and that doesn't even factor in the fact that Biden in 2020 and Hillary in 2016 did worse against Trump than the polls predicted.
Response to Post removed (Original post)
Post removed
lame54
(36,307 posts)It will be because of this time wasting argument
lees1975
(5,063 posts)And all that continuously bringing it up will do is help Trump win.
Is that what you want? I answered your question, you answer mine.