General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSerious question here about President Biden and the upcoming election.
When evaluating a politician, it's important to look at their accomplishments over time, rather than focusing on one bad debate. For example, President Biden has a long history of accomplishments, including his work on the Violence Against Women Act.
Thoughts?
Emile
(42,234 posts)brer cat
(27,574 posts)all that he has accomplished, it is just a minor blip. Someone decided to take advantage of that to smear him, and the pile-on began.
William769
(59,147 posts)Have taken it Hook, line & sinker.
brer cat
(27,574 posts)I am not going to get caught up trying to divine motives.
Something Is Rotten in the State of Denmark
That is all.
Oh, one more thing.
Biden Harris 2024
Walleye
(44,759 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Yes, prior records and accomplishments are important, but people change over time, not just physically and mentally, but also politically. So, it's also important to look at the present-day version for context.
Personally, I don't think one debate should end a political career and I support the president staying in the race, but I'm also not privy to private conversations between the president and his staff, family, and colleagues. That's why I've been a bit wary about making absolute statements. I think there's information that we're not aware of. Whether it's potentially disqualifying, I can't say.
William769
(59,147 posts)I can make an absolute statment because President Biden has.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)It was in response to the portion of your statement about evaluating a politician. I understand that it was about President Biden, but my thoughts on the matter could apply to any politician.
Reagan, for example. Second-term Reagan was a pale imitation of the original, and many thought he wasn't fit to serve. Many of us thought he was never fit to serve, but that's another conversation.
With Reagan, signs were everywhere. With President Biden, the discussions mostly revolve around the one debate, though some people also fixate on times that he misspeaks. I find the latter a little specious, because a) most people misspeak, many quite often, and b) misstatements have always kind of been his thing, and it generally made him look more like a real person.
William769
(59,147 posts)Was President wilson fit to serve his 2nd term? Didn't really matter, our Government kept on churning, as I am sure it would if anything were to happen to President Biden. We have a line of succession for a reason.
I apologize to you if it sounds like I'm ranting, I just get really pissed off when people make much ado about nothing.
greatauntoftriplets
(178,983 posts)The enemy is drumpf, not President Biden. This all pisses me off.
William769
(59,147 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(178,983 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(10,267 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)But people saying like like "Things are looking very dire." Doesn't help.
lees1975
(7,042 posts)He's running against a guy who has no record of achieving anything political, had the worst four year presidency in history, ran up the deficit to alarming levels with tax cuts that did nothing except spur inflaation, and is likely going to be in prison when the election rolls around.
If you think one of those polls is an accurate predictor of where the electorate will be on election day, you've been duped. I doubt that much of the data in those polls is real, most of it is electronic. And heaviily manipulated.
This is an attack, from the other side, with Russian help. It looks and smells like it.
Renew Deal
(85,110 posts)The debate was used as an excuse.
Jon Favreau, Axelrod, and Clooney all said that they had concerns after the fundraiser. They pounced after the debate.
William769
(59,147 posts)Renew Deal
(85,110 posts)I think it was a SOTU in his first term.
Edit: I checked. It was 2010
mcar
(46,046 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)My favorite though was before me but he always was and always will be my favorite, FDR.