General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is who the Corp media is pushing for Kamala's VP
Last edited Sun Jul 21, 2024, 08:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Edit! The list narrows!!
old link:
Walleye
(44,778 posts)still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)Walleye
(44,778 posts)ChazII
(6,448 posts)and one I would feel comfortable seeing as VP.
musicblind
(4,563 posts)I worry about who their replacements would be.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)With no guarantee they will hold the seat. It was very close when Kelly ran. While Kelly is an interesting possible choice, we need to consider senate math too. There are lots of good VP candidates that don't take away a valuable senate seat in a state we may not be able to win back.
radius777
(3,921 posts)as he'd almost guarantee us AZ and NV - but it would put that seat at risk in the long term. He's uniquely popular there, yet still his last race was still close against some Maga stiff they put up. All of the races in AZ seem to be nail biters - Hobbs barely won for gov against the psycho Lake.
GoreWon2000
(1,461 posts)among statewide candidates in 2022. He ran an amazing campaign so he certainly knows how to win. I'm partial to Kelly but there are a lot of good choices.2022 AZ results were amazing. AZ is no longer an automatic red state. It was maga GOP threats to women's reproductive rights and democracy that carried the day. A pro choice ballot initiative is on the ballot for 2024 which should also help the dems.
brush
(61,033 posts)a huge advantage. If he/she can't established themselves with the voters in that time it's on them, meanwhile we keep our Senate majority.
Why look for the dark cloud in the silver lining?
radius777
(3,921 posts)McSally was appointed by the Repub gov (for McCain's seat) and lost twice. It's simply a difficult seat to win, for either an R or D, due to the swingy nature of the state.
brush
(61,033 posts)appoints a Dem senator in AZ? That's some reasoning you've conjured up,
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)There are better choices that also help us in swing states (Shapiro) and don't put a senate seat we barely won at risk.
brush
(61,033 posts)and we stand a chance of gaining two US Senators from AZ with Kelly on the ticket helping Ruben Gallego in his US Senate reace against election denier Kari Lake.
That would help us keep our majority in the Senate and perhaps gain a seat.
Carry on.
Walleye
(44,778 posts)pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)this is the wrong time to be risking vulnerable seats we may not be able to win back.
brush
(61,033 posts)thereby creating the possibilty of AZ having two Dem senators as with Kelly on the national Dem ticket, it could help Ruben Gallego defeat election denier Kari Lake in their US Senate race.
Perhaps she'll continue claiming to be the actual governor of AZ.
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)We barely won that seat with Kelly as it is. It just seems like an unnecessary risk to potentially throw away a senate seat when there are other candidates like Shapiro who help us in swing states and wouldn't cost us a senate seat. Why risk Kelly's seat at all?
brush
(61,033 posts)the US Senate against rhe electon denier Kari Lake, which has the possibility of giving AZ, a battleground state, TWO Democratic US Senators...the one the governor would appoint to Kelly's vacated seat, and the seat Gallego could very well win against kari lake so she can go on pretending that she's the actual governor of AZ.
One has to consider all the possibilities. I know it would occur to you eventually.
Carry on.
valleyrogue
(2,713 posts)I really don't want a governor on the ticket. Democrats need all the statehouses they can get, and being a governor doesn't really prepare one for national politics the way a holder of a federal office does. Yes, I know about FDR, etc., but my opinion still stands.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)BlueInPhilly
(971 posts)Constitutionally, he can be VP as long as he wants
Windy Apple
(63 posts)because he is ineligible to serve as President if the president should vacate the office.
musicblind
(4,563 posts)and it was determined that if someone in the cabinet or speakership could not serve as president, they would simply be skipped over in the line of succession, but that they could still serve in their respective non-presidential roles?
Retrograde
(11,419 posts)He was Nixon's Secretary of State, but because he was not a natural born citizen was no eligible to be president. He was confirmed into the cabinet post, but would have been skipped if the succession got that far down.
The Constitution states that no person who is not eligible to be president shall be elected as vice president. So that leaves Obama out
Windy Apple
(63 posts)In the constitution that the VP assumes the role. If both are incapacitated or die, it goes to house speaker.
Timewas
(2,739 posts)Not so sure there, he cannot be elected to a third term but not so sure he cannot be VP and take over if needed.
Windy Apple
(63 posts)2.5 is more than two.
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)Two terms + half a term if they succeed a president who dies or is disabled. LBJ replaced Kennedy in 1963 after the assassination, won re--election in 1964, but realized that he would have a tough re-election campaign in 1968 and retired instead.
Windy Apple
(63 posts)Im new at this !
Response to Nimble_Idea (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)When did the big donors "pass the torch" back to the media?
texasfiddler
(2,199 posts)That ain't sayin much
obamanut2012
(29,357 posts)Pachamama
(17,563 posts)Just curious
In It to Win It
(12,645 posts)Which would be hard to do for the incumbent governor of California.
Pachamama
(17,563 posts)Retrograde
(11,419 posts)after the House and Senate confirmed the results of the 2020 election.
President/Vice President/Members of Congress have traditionally been viewed as being residents of their home states who happen to be in DC for their jobs - many senators and reps have residences in the DC area where they stay for part of the year. The issue you should be investigating is where are Newsom and Harris registered to vote.
texasfiddler
(2,199 posts)12th Amendment??
Pachamama
(17,563 posts)Details
Marcuse
(8,998 posts)
Joinfortmill
(21,135 posts)wryter2000
(47,940 posts)I don't think Newsom would work. He and Harris are not only from California but from the Bay Area.
Reader Rabbit
(2,758 posts)He's incredible, but many people have a stereotypically negative view of Californians, and GN seems like he would push those buttons. I think Pete would be great. He'd bring in a lot of enthusiastic younger voters, as well as Midwesterners.
Unwind Your Mind
(2,347 posts)Newsom is my governor and I dont think he has national appeal
And he has PG&E $$$$ problems, so
Quakerfriend
(5,882 posts)would not go over well with mainstream America
.
greatauntoftriplets
(178,984 posts)chicoescuela
(3,075 posts)Texin
(2,851 posts)Mark Kelly would be pretty awesome, but what would that mean for Arizona?
chicoescuela
(3,075 posts)aggiesal
(10,789 posts)(D)'s are sure to win California, but with both on the ticket from California,
they would not be allowed to claim California's electoral college votes.
My suggestion would be Whitmer.
Pachamama
(17,563 posts)And while California hatred exists - Gavin Newsom is a great Democrat and leader and would be a great choice
aggiesal
(10,789 posts)2 people regardless of their position in or out of government, from the same state, can not claim their Electoral Votes ever.
This was going to happen, when GW McIdiot chose Darth Cheney for his running mate, while Cheney was a resident of Texas, running Halliburton out of Dallas.
Since GW was from Houston, they couldn't claim Texas Electoral Votes.
So Cheney had to set up residency in Wyoming, his home state, only 4 days before the selection was announced.
As we all know in 2000, they needed every Electoral Vote, they could get, to win.
roamer65
(37,952 posts)It locks down MI in the D column and will generate a lot of enthusiasm in the Great Lakes and Midwest states.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)malthaussen
(18,564 posts)... and if you think it improbable that the DNC will choose someone else, how probable did you think it was that Mr Biden would drop out?
-- Mal
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)The delegates do and theyre mostly Biden loyalists. Biden endorsed Kamala so Im very sure shell be the nominee.
haele
(15,383 posts)It's who Harris picks, who she thinks can best balance her both politically and in the Executive Office.
All the Democratic leadership is probably huddling with her now, if they haven't already done so.
Hopefully they'll pick someone strong where we don't potentially lose a legislative seat or governorship. There's a strategy that's got to go forward. We need to get the House, keep the Senate, and help the Governors.
Haele
Lancero
(3,276 posts)Is DU - Are we? - corporate media too?
Deep State Witch
(12,709 posts)Roy Cooper and Andy Beshear are both popular Dem governors in southern states. Cooper is term-limited, so he's out as of January anyway. Pete Buttigieg has probably been the most effective member of the Cabinet, is super-smart, and would make mincemeat out of Vance. I love Wes Moore, but he's really only been governor for 2 years. Besides, Maryland is reliably blue. Same with Pritzker in Illinois - a reliably blue state. Taking Warnock or Kelly out of the Senate right now would be really tough, since we only have a 1-vote margin. Shapiro and Whitmer are both popular governors of swing states. I don't know much about Gina Raimondo.
Another good VP candidate would be Jay Inslee of Washington. But then it's a West-coast-only ticket. My bet is that it's going to be Cooper, Beshear, or Buttigieg.
Grown2Hate
(2,212 posts)(since a Democratic Gov would replace him). He's starting to make a lot of sense, and not just because I'm from AZ.
Unwind Your Mind
(2,347 posts)Is if I were a Democrat from Kentucky (somebody correct me if Im wrong) I wouldnt want Beshear running off to be VP. Hes standing between the people of his state and all kinds of fked up repub shenanigans. He needs to stay with them imo its too important
Island Blue
(6,287 posts)Having him on the ticket could help with winning the state (and help Josh Stein win the gubernatorial race). My only concern about him is that hes pretty low key, and not a super dynamic speaker.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)but I agree. Kamala might want to put NC in play and pick him. Safe bet is Shapiro though.
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)If they were the only good candidates, maybe, but there are lots of good names. They both won those seats by really narrow margins and there is no guarantee whoever took their place would win them again. People keep saying Kelly's seat replacement would be appointed by a democratic governor, but they're forgetting that person would have to run again in both 2026 and 2028 with no guarantee they would hold the seat. It took someone as popular as Kelly to get it in the first place. We need him where he is.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)think it will be down to Coop or Shapiro. With PA getting the nod.
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)Pete is my first choice, but Shapiro brings Pennsylvania and we need that.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,604 posts)He's bright and communicates well.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,181 posts)Some strategically better than others, but all worth considering.
OnDoutside
(20,868 posts)do they have to be mindful of who would replace him if successful ?
duncang
(3,767 posts)Id like to see a vp pick from a state with a democrat governor first of all. Whether U.S. representative or senator. Im pretty sure the governor gets to pick a temporary until elections to fill the seat. This would keep the status quo.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)we will be in good shape on all fronts. He runs PA until he takes office.
JCMach1
(29,201 posts)Dude has billions in LIQUID cash from sale of Mavericks shares and other deals. Instant name recognition and positive spin. Legit cred for helping people...
Neutralizes socialism noise BS.
Oh, and reality TV famous... Way more than his orangeness.
A phone call and a yes and WE win in a landslide with that ticket.
TexasBushwhacker
(21,199 posts)He's a billionaire who is actually a self made man, unlike Trump, Musk and so many others.
JCMach1
(29,201 posts)My main point being, don't just fixate on DC for the VP spot.
There are quite a few choices that could blow the race wide open. Cuban, however you feel about him, would be a game changer.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)and I'm not sure having billionaires on the ticket is advisable.
I like Mike Bloomberg, but we saw what happened.
valleyrogue
(2,713 posts)We have been there and done that, and the results were terrible.
JCMach1
(29,201 posts)We should be lucky enough he would actually do it .
valleyrogue
(2,713 posts)The Trump disaster is what we got when we pulled a celebrity off the street.
I don't want celebrities anywhere NEAR the White House. At least Reagan ran for and was elected governor of California prior to his presidential runs.
JCMach1
(29,201 posts)In the last couple of weeks.
Where were some of the politicos like Beshear, Cooper, Kelly, etc?
Undecideds and Independents will be up for grabs with the switch to Harris.
Only question, are we really playing to win.
No more reality TV stars, actors, influencers, bros, and other unserious contenders. Politicians require a different mindset and skillset than businessmen and self promoters. Women are going to dominate this election. The last thing we want to see is a dude who reminds us of a narcissistic ex-husband or boyfriend whos out drinking beer and watching WWE at 2am while were home changing diapers. That is not legit cred to us.
TygrBright
(21,360 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,199 posts)politicat
(9,810 posts)N/t
Indykatie
(3,868 posts)Renew Deal
(85,112 posts)She was a governor from RI. Doesnt help with a region, but very experienced.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)Renew Deal
(85,112 posts)I had other
Im pretty open minded on the topic
somaticexperiencing
(594 posts)above all else - I'm ready to get out there, donate, campaign, work hard, speak out, move forward with gusto.
I'm fired up and ready to go.
Moving together, hopefully, in our individual ways to defeat the absolute threat of Donald J. Trump and company.
What a bunch of hypocrites, liars, bigots, bullies, and Fascists they are.
I'll leave my thoughts on the ones that called for this till later.
As long as we get a concerted, coordinated campaign around people like Kamala and this group, I'm actually excited to move out of my grief into my action.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)Fired up!
Raftergirl
(1,855 posts)Bloggers? Influencers? Other DU posters? Iimaginary friend?
You all need to get a grip.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(4,496 posts)Who decides?
Three months out. Totally normal, right? JFC.
JustAnotherGen
(38,045 posts)Who wouldn't stab her in the back is Moore - and maybe Pete.
Windy Apple
(63 posts)1 Whitmer
2 Mayor Pete
3 Mike Kelly
Lovie777
(22,949 posts)RWers
FloridaBlues
(4,665 posts)democratsruletheday
(1,879 posts)fo sho
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)they can't take from him.
bucolic_frolic
(55,096 posts)Whitmer and Shapiro bring their own states aboard, though Shapiro hasn't been in office long enough. I think the rest are long shots.
I don't know enough about Cooper, though he must be something to keep getting elected in NC.
Would we go with an all female ticket?
Island Blue
(6,287 posts)Hes had a tough roe to hoe because of our current Republican super majority in both legislative branches (fuck gerrymandering), but hes still managed to do a fantastic job. Hes not a super dynamic speaker (imo), but thats the only negative that I can think of off the top of my head.
MOMFUDSKI
(7,080 posts)to death. We wait
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)when I do, i'll let you know what they think about your point.
but so far, the silence speaks volumes!! They ghosting me!
rampartc
(5,835 posts)or perhaps jon bel edwards.
a southern white male governor might attract the saner repubs?
i will settle for any kind of win, but a crushing defeat for trump and his flying monkeys would be nice.
DET
(2,496 posts)Id love it to be Buttigieg, but thats probably too risky. Josh Shapiro would be a safer bet. I never heard of Pritzker, Cooper, or Raimondo until today.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)someone really trying hard on that one.
democratsruletheday
(1,879 posts)make it so! I'd be happy with any ONE of those 3
usonian
(25,220 posts)I'm about ready to block all material not originating from a DU member's keyboard.
NOMINEES ARE NOT THE MEDIA'S CHOICE
PRESIDENTS ARE NOT THE MEDIA'S CHOICE
CABINET MEMBERS ARE NOT THE MEDIA'S CHOICE
BASKIN AND ROBBINS FLAVORS ARE NOT THE MEDIA'S CHOICE
Message to media: report the f***ing news or go home and get your f***ing shine boxes.
Emile
(42,248 posts)Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)If you did, we wouldn't know the "donors" were up to no good and trying to push Joe out.
Have to keep the head up and looking 360!
usonian
(25,220 posts)Not the ultimate source, but Hacker News moderates links. About the same time EarlG posted his magnum opus.
Hacker News members tend to be quite sharp with sources. I've seen some shredded (and called out one or two, myself)
Hear ya!
nevergiveup
(4,815 posts)Catherine Vincent
(34,610 posts)iemanja
(57,751 posts)He's a great resource.
rgbecker
(4,890 posts)His midwest roots and work ethic would certainly help get the "Working class" to the polls for our ticket.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)My list only has Shapiro.
Anything else isn't optimal.
angrychair
(12,267 posts)But I'm in on Roy Cooper. He could help tip the scales blue in NC, which works help offset a lose in other purple states like AZ and GA.
More importantly, I think he could help boost the numbers in VA and even in GA.
Nimble_Idea
(2,849 posts)He's certainly on the shortlist -
It will come down to Cooper or Shapiro.
I'm not sold on the whole NC thing. It's like the old Florida mirage.
Shapiro is optimal imho.
mucholderthandirt
(1,783 posts)He's done amazing work for the state, despite being vetoed by our dumb state house and senate people.
But my worry is, if we put Harris at the top of the ticket, with an older white male behind her, people are going to overlook her in favor of the older, white male. That's not going to work.
She needs someone young, if a man, and someone who won't allow her to be the "token black female" on the ticket. Harris would be a strong president, we don't need to stab her in the back. I say, let her choose, male, female, white, not, straight, not, whatever.