Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
Sun Jul 21, 2024, 07:43 PM Jul 2024

Reality Check: Gavin Newsom cannot be the VP choice

Per the Constitution:

Twelfth Amendment

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves


Both Newsom and Harris are registered voters in California.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reality Check: Gavin Newsom cannot be the VP choice (Original Post) brooklynite Jul 2024 OP
He wouldn't be a good choice anyway, he doesn't have the experience in foreign affairs. JohnSJ Jul 2024 #1
Thanks for the reminder. multigraincracker Jul 2024 #2
This is a common misconception. BlueTsunami2018 Jul 2024 #3
Technically they can, but CA's electors can only vote for one of them. Ocelot II Jul 2024 #4
Does she not reside in D.C.? DC77 Jul 2024 #5
I don't think that's what it means exactly. Arthur_Frain Jul 2024 #6
 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
1. He wouldn't be a good choice anyway, he doesn't have the experience in foreign affairs.
Sun Jul 21, 2024, 07:44 PM
Jul 2024

Ocelot II

(130,331 posts)
4. Technically they can, but CA's electors can only vote for one of them.
Sun Jul 21, 2024, 07:47 PM
Jul 2024

So unless one of them establishes residency in another state like Cheney did so he could be W's running mate (and not sacrifice TX's electoral votes), CA's electoral votes could be cast only for Harris or only for Newsom.

Arthur_Frain

(2,330 posts)
6. I don't think that's what it means exactly.
Sun Jul 21, 2024, 07:51 PM
Jul 2024

It’s a difficultly worded passage, but I don’t believe it means the two positions have to come from different states, I think this passage is referring to the electors home state.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reality Check: Gavin News...