General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStreet artist behind satirical NYPD 'Drone' posters arrested
A street artist who hung satirical posters criticising police surveillance activities has been arrested after an NYPD investigation tracked him to his doorstep. With the help of a small crew, the artist now identified as Essam Attia had placed the fake Big Brother-style adverts in locations throughout Manhattan, using a fake Van Wagner maintenance van and uniforms to avoid detection.
The NYPD's response seems to have proven Attia's point: months after forensics teams and a "counter-terrorism" unit was spotted on the scene, the NYPD last Wednesday successfully tracked down and arrested the 29-year-old art school vandal, who identified himself in the video as a former "geo-spatial analyst" serving US military operations in Iraq.
It's not the first time the NYPD has overreacted to unsanctioned public art. Earlier this year, the department arrested 50-year-old Takeshi Miyakawa after he illuminated the streets of Williamsburg, Brooklyn with harmless LED lanterns made from plastic "I Heart NY" shopping bags. The crackdown in Attia's case, however, seems to have more to do with the public embarrassment faced by the department as a result of the mock ads.
Attia now faces 56 counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument and grand larceny possession of stolen property for his spree last September
http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/2/3718094/street-artist-nypd-drone-posters-arrested-surveillance

Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Very nice.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Bozita
(26,955 posts)progressoid
(53,179 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)was off the streets.
I think you were being sarcastic btw.
progressoid
(53,179 posts)Who needs them!
yes...
spanone
(141,610 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)This is the Microsoft Surface ad in New York city

Notice it's blatant attempt to mimic they very street art the corporate elite attempts to destroy.
So long as it's making money, it's okay.
As long as it points out the decay in social structures, a joint terrorism task force is deployed to apprehend the 'free thinker'.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)With "less-lethal" weapons, etc. In spite of the fact that a few years before, the "mayor" passed out chalk to supporters of one of his causes and let them mark up the whole place.
The corporate lobby which owns Los Angeles' downtown state clearly in their manifesto that they intend to eliminate "intelligence-based graffiti".
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=950638
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Same was the case here locally, too when there was a jail support action.
During the support action while activists were being bailed/awaiting arraignment the following morning, several of us were threatened with arrest action for defacing public infrastructure for chalking on the sidewalks.
They even went so far as to issue a press statement on the 'vandalism' and several local news stations went down and filed their own reports that evening after we had all left for home; not a single perspective from our side.
I'm a big supporter of street art, and guerrilla advertising, liberating billboards, etc.
It's all corporate sponsored media, corporate sponsored advertising.
When do we get *our* voice?
I refuse to shed a tear over a liberated billboard/kiosk/bus shelter...
high density
(13,397 posts)I assume part of the problem is that he replaced a paying advertiser's message with his own.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)is`t it interesting how street art provokes the ruling class.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)They spend billions molding public opinion, and the wrong word(or image) here or there destroys all of it.
For me, it even came from on of their speakers: Bush talking about how he was "sick and tired" of Saddam not giving up his WMDs that didn't exist.
Found DU after that. Haven't needed MSM news since then except to sample the coming atrocities planned.
ProgressoDem
(221 posts)I also don't think you should be able put up posters willy-nilly.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)
If not willy nilly, how? Describe your perfectly proscribed color inside the lines society for us, won't you?
ProgressoDem
(221 posts)Something doesn't need to be dangerous to be regulated. I happen to think that public ordinances about street art ought to be enforced.
Not to mention that he was taking down advertisements that had already gone up.
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)or New Amsterdam was invented, whichever came first.
ProgressoDem
(221 posts)Especially because it's vandalizing other property by replacing ads with street art. Not the worst thing in the world, but you can't have people doing that.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Money was involved so hate speech was protected. I wonder if he had paid to do what he did would it have been protected? I doubt it, he was telling the truth, she was spreading hatred towards Muslims.. One is acceptable the other is not.
AnneD
(15,774 posts)art, music, and basically culture. It is the first thing dropped in a budget crunch. And why one might ask....because it is so powerful, because they can't control it and because it makes you think, makes you see the truth. Humor is also something they dislike. That is what makes this street art so powerful. Art and sarcastic humor challenging TPTB. No wonder they wasted all that manpower to find this dangerous person.
It terrorizes them and their power, not us. One picture is worth thousand of words in the M$M, and far more powerful.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Thank you.
marble falls
(71,926 posts)struggle4progress
(126,153 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)It's probably being viciously trumped up to cover the cost of the entire advertising campaign of the materials that were removed and replaced with the street art.
Just my .02
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)The people of Gotham City are safe now.

Rex
(65,616 posts)Or a royal toady in the court.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I've tried.
I would LOVE to be able to make this scary, frowney, angry face,
especially at Halloween.
I even used my hands to try to force a frown that deep, and my face just won't do it.
I guess FIRST, you can't have any lips at all.
I've noticed it on a lot of Republicans.

My face won't bend that way either, no matter how hard I try.
They've got some serious issues if that's one of their natural facial expressions.
George II
(67,782 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)and they proved him correct about BB. Actually, I would guess vandalism would be the charge.
George II
(67,782 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
George II
(67,782 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/street-artist-arrested-for-drone-posters-2012-12#ixzz2EPfJxp00
I don't quite get it. But there's nothing new about arresting artists in New York City. One small example:
Flaming Creatures delirium of transgendered eroticism and trashy artifice prompted its first champion Jonas Mekas, then writing in The Village Voice to declare (presciently, as it turned out): It is so beautiful I feel ashamed to sit through the current Hollywood and European movies . The film will not be shown theatrically because our social-moral-etc. guides are sick. This movie will be called pornographic, degenerate, homosexual, trite, disgusting, etc. It is all that and it is so much more than that.
Writing in the same paper in 1972, Hobermandescribes the films powerful affect and the extreme reactions it elicited: Prints were confiscated by the state, Jonas Mekas and others arrested at a screening at the New Bowery Theater in March 1964.
http://www.emanuellevy.com/comment/flaming-creatures-the-making-and-unmaking-of-jack-smiths-seminal-feature-8/
In 1963, Andy Warhol made a movie of Jack Smith filming Normal Love, but it was confiscated by the NYC PD at a screening of the film. It was never returned, and it's never been found.
Rex
(65,616 posts)"Protection when you least expect it".
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)The guy signed his work.
Trailrider1951
(3,581 posts)Free Speech. Oh, wait, that is not free speech! It did not come from some corporation, so it cannot be free speech, bought and paid for, fair and square! Oh, come on, what business do human beings have in expressing their ideas, when you are fed enough "ideas"? Holy shit, I need to unplug...
George II
(67,782 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)As the Stuyvesant case shows, when real crime happens, the NYPD ignore it.