Listen carefully and you can hear magat heads exploding when they consider an effectively immune President Harris and

[Comfortably_Numb]

contemplate the unfettered power that Judge Boof, The Handmaid, and Uncle Slappy, among others, have given her. Tick tock mofos!!!!

[BOSSHOG]

1. And let us not forget that President Biden has immunity

THANKS TO DON TRUMP.

[Eliot Rosewater]

4. I love this positivity, but remember, the decision about what is and is not official will ultimately be made

by the most corrupt SC in history and we can be guaranteed nothing Joe does will be ruled "official."

They really have this whole thing locked up, which is why we must get rid of the filibuster and increase the court.

[BOSSHOG]

6. While we are getting rid of things

How bout the electoral college

[Eliot Rosewater]

8. Yes please.

[Comfortably_Numb]

5. My President still almost 6 months left in his administration and he can remain a good moral man, but stretch his wings

[TwilightZone]

2. I'm sure they would find a way to say that it only applies to Trump.

Just like Cannon's insistence that her ruling only impacts the one case and not others involving a special counsel.

[The Unmitigated Gall]

3. He'll have power/immunity to stop repuke cheating. nt

[Hekate]

7. So you think it's dawned on them?

[Comfortably_Numb]

10. These are not deep thinkers, these magats. They are all giddy that their cult leader can do anything he wants

but they never contemplated that it would apply to a black woman. I wish I could link to that epic scene in The Kingsman when they figured out that they could detonate those neck implants…du geniuses?? Any chance? In any case, suck it magats.

[former9thward]

9. You have totally misread the SC decision.

It does not mean what you think it does.

[Comfortably_Numb]

11. No I haven't. I understand the danger of the court's overstep, but magats aren't known for their profound

intellect. Nuance is a place in France to these turds. But thanks for your observation.

[former9thward]

12. If you think the decision says presidents can be dictators, you are wrong.

[uponit7771]

15. Worse, they are now set up to be final arbiter on what "presidential acts" are giving themselves more power

[Comfortably_Numb]

16. This. FFS, they say the president has a "presumption of immunity", and THEY will decide who is immune for what

and I think we all know which direction this fascist court leans. My original comment was supposed to be a shade tongue in-cheek about magats not thinking their dictator power play through, I’m shocked that I haven’t seen a reply that their heads aren’t going to actually explode, Sheesh!!. President Harris won’t be a dictator when she gets sworn in but anyone who doesn’t think the court unleashed a potential dictator has their ——- head in the sand.

[Diraven]

13. The problem is

The Supreme Court set themselves up as the ultimate arbiter of what "official" acts are, on a case by case basis. This way they can decide anything illegal Trump does is official, and anything a illegal a Democratic president does is not.

[Comfortably_Numb]

17. And empower a de-facto dictator. It's so senseless that it's a joke, on us.

[onenote]

14. You are right, but i don't think many DUers want to hear it.

I'll try one more time to explain it:

The immunity decision applies to criminal prosecutions. But not every unlawful action is a criminal act. Actions taken by presidents get overturned for being unconstitutional, or contrary to statutory law, or otherwise unauthorized all the time. It doesn't result in a criminal prosecution because it doesn't violate any criminal law. The courts can and will enjoin any action that a president takes that is unlawful but not criminal.

Lots of Trump's decisions were overturned or blocked by the courts while he was president. No one ever suggested he was guilty of a crime and he never suggested he was immunity from having the courts overturn or block those actions.