General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVEEP Pick - who do you prefer?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/23/kamala-harris-vp-pickhttps://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/harris-potential-vp-picks-biden-dropout-00170204
I'm fine with anyone Kamala picks for her ticket, but i like Mark Kelly & Josh Shapiro.
Emile
(42,284 posts)sunnybrook
(1,277 posts)Hadn't thought of that. Probably won't happen. But now that you mention it, he would be my first choice
Emile
(42,284 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(16,393 posts)Prairie_Seagull
(4,688 posts)Many reasons why this would/could work. Any word on if he is even interested?
IMO
LizBeth
(11,222 posts)who goes after them. There was a reason he stepped down whether you felt warranted or not and time does not make that go away. Why would you bring that into race especially as there are so many qualified?
Emile
(42,284 posts)LizBeth
(11,222 posts)it is a reality.
Emile
(42,284 posts)spooky3
(38,632 posts)for political reasons, without any hearing or investigation. I dont think thats something DU should accept.
However, VP Harris has lots of good candidates from whom to choose, so I dont think Franken will be considered.
LizBeth
(11,222 posts)also allowed the hate and blame to be one particular woman and not speaking up taking responsibility.
spooky3
(38,632 posts)LizBeth
(11,222 posts)spooky3
(38,632 posts)And without an investigation neither you nor I will ever know whether any of those incidents occurred as the complainants described or if they rose to the level of sexual harassment. Thats not justice.
Bye.
BlueSky3
(733 posts)to prove it.
LizBeth
(11,222 posts)End of world? No. But would I be pissed if I was sleeping and some man did that? Yes. I would.
pat_k
(13,371 posts)When Franken was asked if he regretted his decision to resign from the Senate, he said, Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
The more I learned about the accusation and rush to judgment, the more upset I got about the whole episode. Resigning was absolutely a mistake.
The Case of Al Franken
By Jane Mayer
July 22, 2019
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)LizBeth
(11,222 posts)his behavior was enough for an apology and recognize the issue now. I hate the whitewashing and him owning his part while blaming ONE woman senator when there was 38.
pat_k
(13,371 posts)I think it is a must read.
The Case of Al Franken
By Jane Mayer
July 22, 2019
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)Walleye
(44,797 posts)Also, he is younger.
Trueblue1968
(19,251 posts)Funtatlaguy
(11,878 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 24, 2024, 11:19 AM - Edit history (1)
Of the anti semitic crap he would get.
Skittles
(171,704 posts)no, IT IS TIME
Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,477 posts)Kentucky would still go for Trump. Either Kelly or Shapiro would also be fine.
Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)many swing states. I think thats a good thing. Shapiros stance and vigorous push for school vouchers will hurt I think with many and Kelly is not supported by unions which did support Harris quickly. Kellys opposition to the PRO Act was a mistake on labor issues. Also 2022, Kelly joined Sinema and Manchin to hand the Biden administration a surprise defeat in the Senate on a nominee to lead the Labor Departments Wage and Hour Division. Not good looks when we need working class voters to come out.
pat_k
(13,371 posts).. better late than never.
Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(14,366 posts)I don't want to take Beshear out of where he is right now. Kentucky needs him, even if they don't always think so.
Tadpole Raisin
(1,977 posts)In Kentucky could moderate the voters over time and like I said in another post in 5-10 years we could have a purple state. Who else could do that?
I also didnt realize how popular he was there. You are right - Kentucky needs him there and so do we!
Bettie
(19,704 posts)not the Midwest.
Kelly likely loses us a Senate seat.
Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)The Senate seat would be appointed by the Dem. Governor in Arizona. Mark Kelly's term doesn't end until 1/3/29.....
Bettie
(19,704 posts)so, thanks!
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)end of Kellys term. But thats a good amount of time for the senator to be reelected.
Response to Bettie (Reply #46)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)Bettie
(19,704 posts)but, if we can get an incumbent running, that's cool
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)A. When a vacancy occurs in the office of United States senator or representative in Congress by reason of death or resignation, or from any other cause and except as provided in subsection D of this section, the vacancy shall be filled at the next general election. At such an election the person elected shall fill the unexpired term of the vacated office.
C. For a vacancy in the office of United States senator, the governor shall appoint a person to fill the vacancy. That appointee shall be of the same political party as the person vacating the office and, except as provided in subsection D of this section, shall serve until the person elected at the next general election is qualified and assumes office.
XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)calguy
(6,154 posts)The clear choice for me is Shapiro, and the 19 electoral votes he brings with him.
Trump is heavily counting on Pennsylvania going his way, and without it, his path to the White House narrows considerably.
Plus, he'll mop the floor with JD Vance's head.
women on the ticket might be too much for undecideds. Not for ME, of course, but some men might not be ready.
CTyankee
(68,198 posts)I heard Wes Moore being interviewed and I really like him. Shapiro would be my pick now, tho, as he could bring us a win in PA. Nothing is certain, tho.
claudette
(5,455 posts)I also like Shapiro. He would be my second choice after Newsom.
CTyankee
(68,198 posts)Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)No....They can't be from the same state......So Newsom's not in contention. I'd love to see him in a Cabinet position, though.
claudette
(5,455 posts)MoonchildCA
(1,349 posts)
that they would have to forgo CAs 54 electoral votes. If thats correct, its a nonstarter.
Edit: Ah, it actually says that in one of the articles posted in the OP.
spooky3
(38,632 posts)Column regardless. He hasnt been governor long.
pat_k
(13,371 posts)Not just likeable. He's effective at inspiring people to recognize their own power to make a difference.
I love his service year option after high school and hope the program is expanded in MD. And I think we'll see other states following suit (e.g., apparently Spencer Cox is working on implementing a similar program in Utah). There is no better way to bridge divides than to bring people together in service. I would love to see this go national
And he is actively working to bridge the partisan divide in other ways. For example, check out Wes Moore and Spencer Cox at the "With Malice Toward None, With Charity for All" forum.
The entire program is worthwhile, but the section with Spencer Cox and Wes Moore (14:01 to 51:29) is a must see for anyone looking for signs of hope in a bleak political landscape.
37 minutes
14:01 to 51:29
Keynote: Spencer Cox and Wes Moore
The rest of the program:
44 minutes
52:15 to 1:28:44
Panel
Dr. Timothy Shriver
Ruth Okejiji
Rachel Brand
Donna Brazile
1:28:30 to 1:55:00
Panel
Rev. Dr. David McAllister-Wilson
Joshua Dubois
Peter Wehner
Frasier Balzov
(5,060 posts)I'm hoping she has said No for public consumption as a matter of etiquette only.
calguy
(6,154 posts)Frasier Balzov
(5,060 posts)Term limited?
Just released her autobiography?
Feels like we might be on the verge of a Harris-Whitmer girls team notwithstanding protestations to the contrary.
calguy
(6,154 posts)But I've seen no indications of that happening. But then again, anything is possible. Who could have foreseen where we are today compared to two weeks ago.
Response to calguy (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
spooky3
(38,632 posts)On paper looks good, moderate, etc., but not very helpful to the campaign. I hope she chooses whoever she trusts and I would like it to be a great speaker like Buttigieg or Shapiro, because I think they will call out Trump effectively and excite voters.
NCDem47
(3,470 posts)Questions:
1. Would either one be required to resign current post?
2. In AZ, Dem Gov can appoint replacement?
3. How would it work in PA so we don't loose ground with governorship?
The VP pick needs to be a win-win-win for Ds overall (duh, of course).
Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 24, 2024, 04:35 PM - Edit history (2)
I've been trying to figure out how to do a poll on this but even though a DU'er posted where I could figure out how, I still couldn't figure it out.....
Mark Kelly..........
I've done my research. In AZ, the Governor can appoint until the current term is ended. I was just informed that Mark Kelly's term would end in 2026 and not 2029 so that makes a little bit of a difference....Mark Kelly's a former Astronaut! IMHO, that carries a lot of weight.
I love Shapiro but I worry about the antisemitism......
I think Beshear may be too iffy.....Would Kentucky elect another Dem. for Governor?
Cooper looks pretty good since he's going to be termed out and it's North Carolina where the Republican is cra-cra....
If someone who knows how to post polls, that would be VERY cool so we could get a better visual
I'M SOOOOOOOOOO CONFUSED NOW! But in a good way...
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)Wow.....Thanks for the correction. I've read conflicting information (but I don't remember the sources). Having said that, you're an Arizona DU'er so I'd bet you are right!
Thanks!
onetexan
(13,913 posts)yellowdogintexas
(23,694 posts)as governor. I am 76 years old and I can only remember 3 Republican governors in Kentucky (I did grow up there and still follow politics there) I fondly remember when all our House members were Democrats. Now if I still lived in my home town Jim Gomer would be my House Member. Things have really gone downhill
question everything
(52,132 posts)red dog 1
(33,062 posts)if he became Harris' running mate.
And even though it's possible that a Repuke could win that Senate seat in a special election, I still think he's the best choice.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)I think choosing him would make Pennsylvania one less state to worry about.
crazylikafox
(2,925 posts)still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)Kelly's my top pick...And....The Democratic Governor can make the appointment and he's there until 1/3/29!
still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)Andy Beshear.....He's termed out in Kentucky.
The two who are running for the Governor of Kentucky now are the Republican who's cra-cra and I can't find who the Dem. is. Also, the current Lt. Governor is a Dem....
still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(23,227 posts)But at the moment, I lean towards Roy Cooper, largely for strategic reasons.
Cooper seems to have all the pluses, and none of the potential minuses other potential VPs could bring.
miss-nasty
(269 posts)subterranean
(3,762 posts)He's 67, which is not ideal for grooming a potential future president. But that's not a deal breaker.
Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)I just checked him (Cooper) out and he looks really good too.
NC would be nice to pick up for sure, for sure!
Tommy Carcetti
(44,498 posts)Veteran, astronaut, has an inspirational wife.
planetc
(8,923 posts)could deliver a swing state, brings Giffords to DC as Second Lady, where she carries on about gun legislation. I think he's a non-panicker.
Jilly_in_VA
(14,366 posts)He has the military (Navy) and astronaut chops, and his wife, as I've said before, is a hero to the disabled community as well as to the rest of us. I like Shapiro also, but worry about the anti-semitism. Harris is going to get enough of that because of her husband, let's not pile on.
Tim Walz would be an interesting pick, being a midwesterner and all that. Cooper? I dunno. Since he can't succeed himself, I suppose he'd be okay, but NC isn't going to go blue, I don't think. Someone suggested J.B. Pritzker of Illinois, but I think the "big state" association might be a bit much, although I like what he's doing there.
Al Franken, much as I love him, is simply out of the question. Can you imagine what the Repugs would do to him? Never mind that their candidate is a convicted sexual assaulter!
onetexan
(13,913 posts)given what's at stake. Likewise with Beshear. We're not going to flip that state so no benefit there, but glad he supports Kamala.
raging moderate
(4,624 posts)He very accurately described who Trump and Vance really are. And he is really steady and down to earth. I think he really could appeal to rural voters.
Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)I agree with your assessment.....
bif
(26,995 posts)(Or however you spell his name).
Jilly_in_VA
(14,366 posts)Kamala is getting enough flak as it is for being a woman and Black. It would not be a good idea at this time to add a gay running mate, no matter how good he is. It would just give them more to attack.
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)Anyway, if Pete brought in the gay vote, and those sensitive to this aspic of American life, then we have nothing to be afraid of with this choice. I do not think that he will ever bring up his private life, but if he did, it would be in response to an attack.
I've watched Secretary Pete travel tirelessly across the nation, overseeing repairs and protections to the infrastructure. He approaches his appointment with enthusiasm, energy, and a rock solid foundation of knowledge, which I think he gained from immersing himself in the job. He would be a great helpmate to Kamala, a very solid guardian of our Democracy, and capable of taking on assignments from the President without any problem.
Pete is very respectful, knows rules and customs, and follows the chain of command. He has a military background, is young at 42, and a married man. He has political experience. In short, I don't know why he would not be in the running for VP, because the only baggage he has is that he is gay. It's not a problem, and it's time to let it go. Pete will have all our backs, straight or gay, and we shouldn't throw away a national treasure that can help Kamala beat the stuffings out of Trump et al.
I think it would be an exciting pick, two very solid winners that Trump would be afraid of and couldn't cope with. I mourn the loss of Joe Biden; if there is anything we should fight against, it's ageism. We tend to throw away the very best of us for the silliest of reasons. Biden isn't senile.
We were denied Hillary, a most competent, experienced politician that would have been far better for our country. Not going to happen again! Trump better be planning an escape route, because we are going to fight, and we are going to win! As an aside, Pete probably knows all the possible escape routes Trump could take. Flee, Donald, while you still can!
Response to EndlessWire (Reply #108)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(171,704 posts)I get tired of the sentiment someone should not run for office because it may offend racists, misogynists, homophobes, etc....it's always "now is not the time". Yeah IT IS TIME, BRING IT ON.
phoenix_rising
(323 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)Saying she now has to pick a straight white man for veep. Given Kamala is the first presidential nominee in her adult lifetime she's excited about and how analytical she is i trust her. So much as i love love love Pete B he would not be my choice. I hope in Kamala's administration she will give him another plum assignment. He is SO SO GOOD!!🇺🇸👏🇺🇸
bif
(26,995 posts)If you're going to ruffle feathers, LET'S RUFFLE THEM BIG TIME!!!
SKKY
(12,801 posts)...if he ran for, well, basically anything. He's a generational talent that I hope our country has the opportunity to use to its fullest potential.
phoenix_rising
(323 posts)Were ready for a gay VP if we say we are! We have to move and make it happen or it never will! As Rev Al Sharpton said in response to the statement: I dont know if America is ready for a Black Woman to be President.
Rev Sharpton: America wasnt ready for us to be off the plantation. Its not about what the country is ready for, its about what WE are ready for!
I couldnt agree with him more! We are ready, and in my opinion Pete is the best, most capable candidate. We cant afford to risk losing a Senate seat in a battleground state, and Pete and Chasten (and their beautiful children) live in MI, a swing state. He proudly served as an officer in the navy and was deployed to Afghanistan. His unparalleled talent more than compensates for any perceived lack of experience in winning elections. He is by far the strongest, most capable, most gifted communicator I have ever seen. No one can deliver a message like he can. He shines under immense pressure and consistently excels on Fox News, earning the well-deserved moniker Slayer Pete. It was legendary the way he eviscerated JD Vance on Bill Maher, and I think we would all love to see him have the opportunity to shred him in person in a debate. It would be epic!
He is by far the most exciting, most capable candidate, and we are ready!!
phoenix_rising
(323 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 25, 2024, 12:13 AM - Edit history (1)
that we have had gay Presidents and at least one gay Vice President before. Most presidential historians would agree with this. So its nothing new. The difference is that Pete is out and proud. He should be rewarded for his authenticity, and his identity and beautiful family should be celebrated.
Edited to emphasize that people dont think twice about voting for closeted cases (like Lindsey Graham). For most rational people, honesty and authenticity in a candidate is an asset, not a deal breaker.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)phoenix_rising
(323 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 25, 2024, 01:05 AM - Edit history (1)
Presidents: James Buchanan, and possibly Abraham Lincoln
VP: William Rufus King, 13th vice president of the United States (relationship with Buchanan)
https://www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/2017/1/18/15-gay-founding-fathers-and-mothers#rebelltitem1
Edited to add source about Lincoln:
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0027.205/--did-abraham-lincoln-sleep-with-his-bodyguard-another-look-at?rgn=main;view=fulltext
sinkingfeeling
(57,834 posts)Rebl2
(17,738 posts)debm55
(60,591 posts)krawhitham
(5,072 posts)He's one of our least reliable votes in the Senate
Of the 51 people that caucus with Democrats, he ranks 46th
ratchiweenie
(8,215 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,645 posts)to pick the best running mate to win the election.
flakey_foont
(3,394 posts)claudette
(5,455 posts)Gavin Newsom - I love him! I do realize he's from the same state so that might create a problem, but a Harris/Newsom ticket is the best in my view!
Dave Bowman
(7,153 posts)Botany
(77,319 posts)But my #1 choice is whomever the Vice President wants.
Deep State Witch
(12,713 posts)All of them are fine choices. Walz was especially good on Alex last night. But, that being said, Cooper has one advantage that the others do not. He is finishing his term in January. The others are still in the middle of their terms.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)That & we can certainly benefit with NC a swing state.
Clouds Passing
(7,930 posts)Astronaut
Fighter pilot
US Senator
Would love to have Gabby Giffords be our Second Lady!!!!!
SKKY
(12,801 posts)...We must keep Kelly, as much as I admire him, in AZ to protect our narrow majority in the Senate. Shapiro would bring his 19 EC votes, plus he's a damn impressive communicator that would be a fantastic VP.
LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)SKKY
(12,801 posts)...the information you just posted. Ok, that might change things for me. Kelly is really, really good. But, the good news is we have a very, very deep bench. I'd honestly be happy with either.
Srkdqltr
(9,759 posts)Nevilledog
(55,079 posts)Emile
(42,284 posts)yorkster
(3,832 posts)last year. He did support vouchers, don't know if he still does.
He's really strong on other fronts. Have to find out more.
Nevilledog
(55,079 posts)Inquirer article without paywall
https://archive.li/TEVaZ
yorkster
(3,832 posts)Food for thought.
epreic01
(262 posts)1.)Beshear- Good Family Man, and great personal touch. Not an afraid to be progressive. Strong fighter as AG in KY he was great. Shows a lot of confidence to choose someone that isnt from a swing state. Probably wouldnt put KY in play, but could force Trump to put money into KY. Great campaigner. Respected by Unions. His Dad was a great governor of KY and would be good at getting Blue Collar endorsements. This ticket gives me Clinton/Gore 92 energy.
2.) Walz- saw him on last night. He was really good. Strong, but funny and likable.
3.)Pete- master of explaining things to dumb people.
4.)Kelly- solid conventional choice, but doesnt have much charisma
5.) Pritzker- Tons of money
6.) Shapiro- I dont think he has the amount of experience Id like to see. I think he is an upcoming star.
Any of these choices are better than Vance and would only strengthen the ticket. We are is a good position. I like being us right now
onetexan
(13,913 posts)Both PA & AZ are tough states so either way wld be fine w me. Kelly would have the edge given that senate seat would be safe in Dems hands till 2026 as someone mentioned, but AZ also has added plus in that it is a border state. Dunno. I like both of them equally.
peggysue2
(12,531 posts)He can shore up Pennsylvania which we absolutely need and is a remarkable speaker. He's also very popular in PA.
I love Mark Kelly but if you had to choose the more important state to win, Pennsylvania is critical.
cpamomfromtexas
(1,490 posts)flamingdem
(40,888 posts)Though a few days ago someone here said Gabby wouldn't want him to take the job.
Fla Dem
(27,633 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)orange jar
(878 posts)All of her choices are great, though.
Ruby Zee
(206 posts)He would bring a lot to the campaign and the office, but all the choices are great!
awesomerwb1
(5,102 posts)Our Dem Governor in AZ would appoint another Dem to this seat until January 1st 2029.
I like Shapiro as well but he appears to have a BIG problem with the younger vote because of some remarks about pro-Palestine supporters he made, and the Penn issue as well. We can't afford to lose any young voters so Mark Kelly for me.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)Whoever won the seat at that time would hold it until 2029.
Shrek
(4,428 posts)jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)Not to be ageist but youth is our strength now lean into it. He's the best advocate for the campaign.
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)with young people. Let's keep it going.
Persondem
(2,101 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)Political choice purely tactical... Kelly.
Pete will feed the haters, Shapiro will fuel the anti-semites and yes some are on the left.
Kelly is an American hero and has very high approval ratings. Might even bring AZ into play.
underpants
(196,491 posts)Anyone else from a battleground state is fine. Kelly or Cooper Id say are the best. I know a lot of people here wouldnt like it but Mark Warner would be a great pick. Hes probably not interested though.
Greybnk48
(10,724 posts)Pete a slight bit more. I worry about bigotry hurting Pete (though I may be wrong--I hope I am).
angrychair
(12,279 posts)He brings a lot to the table in my opinion.
1) as a two term governor from NC he could help deliver it for the first time since 2008.
2) As a successful 2 term progressive Democrat in a very purple state, he knows how to handle those conversations in southern states like Virginia and Georgia and could help backstop our efforts there.
3) I honestly think he could help play the margins in places like Texas and other southern states and make a difference.
2nd choice would be Kelly.
3rd would be Shapiro (but soured on him because of his support for charter schools)
Or
Beshear (tied) -biggest negative on him would be he could not deliver Kentucky but he still might be able to make progress in places like Georgia or other mid-west states
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)Deep State Witch
(12,713 posts)My guess is that he's 1) going to be Secretary of State; 2) Wants to stay on at DoT; or 3) Going to head home to Indiana and run for statewide office.
nbsmom
(653 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)spooky3
(38,632 posts)Deep State Witch
(12,713 posts)About 6 hours after I posted my response.
Things are moving at Warp 9.9.
nbsmom
(653 posts)And I wouldn't count out Walz.
BigDemVoter
(4,700 posts)I'm fine with anyone also, but I do like Mark Kelly & Josh Shapiro. . . .
ArnoldLayne
(2,263 posts)Big Blue Marble
(5,691 posts)Brings Arizona and strong appeals to center right voters who like strong white men.
Wanderlust988
(784 posts)He has the choir boy image but is about as ruthless and cunning of a politician as you'll ever find. He'd be great with Harris!
moonscape
(5,722 posts)ruthless is what I want to see, though I know you didnt mean the way I read it.
Im exhausted by mean violent imagery, and loved loving our president who was the antithesis of that.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)I think Kelly fills a lot of needed gaps. Plus I really want to see J.D. try his "I was a Marine" bullshit on Kelly.
krawhitham
(5,072 posts)Iggo
(49,927 posts)Bucky
(55,334 posts)Wait, no. I subconsciously wrote them in alphanumeric order. I'm a nerd.
lizardkingjr
(95 posts)Pete Buttigieg.
Skya Rhen
(2,724 posts)Joe Cool
(1,091 posts)polichick
(37,626 posts)CousinIT
(12,538 posts)I do like the guy, though, and he'd be a great pick.
Roy Cooper will be free after January and is a lifelong champion for the middle class, women, and workers. He has much experience in many roles as a Democrat.
Mark Kelly leaves a Senate seat open and may be too soft-spoken?
It seems there are important considerations for any of them. But they'd all be good picks.
Buttigieg has young babies at home and is LGBTQ ( I personally would LOVE a ticket with a woman of color and an LGBTQ person on it, especially Pete). But there are Dem voters who would side-eye thathow many, I don't know. But what an awesome ticket that would be. It shouts "FUTURE"!
I dunno!
ARandomPerson
(2,486 posts)Austin Davis, who was Josh Shapiros running mate.
CousinIT
(12,538 posts)There is some rumbling about someone in PA being an election denier and how that might be an issue if Shapiro is chosen for VP.
My bad memory!
ARandomPerson
(2,486 posts)Austin Davis, who was Josh Shapiros running mate.
brush
(61,033 posts)Az has a slight edge as Az is a battleground state, and Kelly on the presidential ticket may very well help Ruben Gallego's run against the hated election denier Kari Lake for the other Az US Senate seat. The governor of course will appoint another Democrat to fill Kelly's vacated seat. If that scenario happens, Az, a state turning blue, could have TWO, count 'em, TWO Democratic US Senators. And it goes wilthout saying that will help us with our Dem majorith in the US Senate.
Curiously, Califoria Governor Gavin Newsom is not being mentioned. I think it's probably because he came out so vociferously, and first, in defense of Joe Biden after the poor debate performance. And maybe he quietly took his name out of consideration.
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)and may not be good fit for VP. Plus he was married to Kim G.
pat_k
(13,371 posts)Gavin Newsom gives me the creeps. I don't understand his popularity. I guess he must be a savvy politician, but he has always struck me as a sleazy salesman type. You know, the guy you instinctively steer clear of on the showroom floor.
pat_k
(13,371 posts)Pres and Vice Pres from the same state is a problem:
From the 12th Amendment:
The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; . . .
So, if I'm an elector from California, I need a ticket that has either the P or the VP from a state other than California.
Cheney and Bush were both from TX but Cheney sold his Dallas house and changed his residency.
brush
(61,033 posts)He probably knows that and let others know he's not to be considered.
Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)For Walz. The more I learn the more I really like.
- universal free school meals
- legal weed
- carbon free electricity by 2040
- tax rebates for the working class up to $1,300 (making under $150k per year)
- 12 weeks paid family leave
- 12 weeks paid sick leave
- banned conversion therapy
- red flag laws for guns
- universal background checks for guns
- automatic voter registration
- free public college (under $80k)
- ban on PFAS (forever chemicals)
- $2.2 billion increase in k-12 school funding
- sectoral bargaining for nursing home workers
pat_k
(13,371 posts)Torchlight
(6,822 posts)I'm looking at a wide, deep pool of talent. The way I feel about any of them over another is like asking me, "who's more attractive, Irenne Dunne or Myrna Loye?" I'd stutter with a reponse, and change my mind each time I made. At this point, and considering the Democratic roster of talent, I'm just gonna wait for Vice President Harris and her staff to sort through it.
red dog 1
(33,062 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)phoenix_rising
(323 posts)Dem4life1234
(2,533 posts)Tribetime
(7,145 posts)Indykatie
(3,868 posts)With Shapiro, we'd spend too much time talking about Israel and Gaza politics and turn off many younger voters.
LudwigPastorius
(14,723 posts)His extra-Earth exploits have earned him national name (if not face) recognition.
He just might deliver Arizona's electoral votes to Harris.
There are people out there who might not vote for Kamala, if not for a "traditional" low-key, white, male candidate on the ticket to moderate their unease. Sad, but true.
Politicub
(12,328 posts)My pick is whoever Kamala chooses.