General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBESHEAR!!!! There's a reason Kentucky Progressives are Screaming his Name
I am not of the mindset that her running mate needs to be a straight white Christian man. I am of the mindset that we need a ticket that is young and ELECTRIC!
Andy may be one of the MOST popular governors in the US. However, he could be the most popular if took the easy road. He hasnt. This man has stood up for the transgender community as if he was running for mayor of San Francisco. In Kentucky!!!
Hed be such a strong message of wanting unity and peace in our country. To choose someone who isnt from a swing state she would project confidence and send a message that she would be a president for all Americans.
His Dad is former Governor Steve Beshear. Also very popular and very well connected. He would raise money and get big endorsements. I think hed attract the blue collar union members that arent yet sold on Madam President.
Hes not just an Aw shucks kind of guy. He is tough as nails and fights back effectively.
He is authentic. Ive met him and everyone that has met him are taken back by how ordinary he is in person.
His family. His wife and kids are so cute and humble. His kids go to public school and I have a friend that teaches at that school. His kids are sweet. They are involved parents and never expect special treatment.
This ticket would be exciting and energetic like Clinton/Gore in 92.
Last, NO Matter who she picks, no matter what we think, WE HAVE TO ACT like its the best decision anyone in human history has ever made. We cannot let the enthusiasm die and we cant lose momentum. We are in the fight of our lives. Failure is not an option.
So get on board and smile.
senseandsensibility
(24,937 posts)I like Beshear, but the details you give are very illuminating and most non Kentuckians probably don't know them. I am leaning towards him now thanks to you. Recently, I tried to assure everyone that Kamala, someone I've been very familiar with for a long time, was going kick you know what. And she did! There's nothing like local knowledge.
Mister Ed
(6,925 posts)mzmolly
(52,792 posts)I've been on that wagon for a time. Though, I'd be happy with any of those being considered.
OMGWTF
(5,130 posts)ShazzieB
(22,577 posts)Beshear sounds great, but I kind of hate to take him away from KY.
Oh well, I'm sure whoever Kamala picks will be awesome. I'm excited to find out who it will be!
mzmolly
(52,792 posts)to say.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)This might actually help us by allowing Coleman the benefits of incumbency.
ShazzieB
(22,577 posts)epreic01
(262 posts)His Lt. Governor would finish his term. Kentucky has a pretty good track record of electing dems as governors. The Republicans that have been elected have been disastrous. Heres why. Kentucky is a welfare state. Much of the state benefits from social programs. Kentucky is socially conservative. Whenever we elect a Republican Governor they try to cut programs and people lose their minds. Since 2000 we have had 2 Republican Governors and they have only lasted one term.
The benefit of selecting Andy is we dont lose someone that we need to legislate nationally.
Response to OMGWTF (Reply #45)
edisdead This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)calimary
(89,967 posts)Bundbuster
(4,018 posts)
CrispyQ
(40,963 posts)Nothing against fine, older, democratic men but to me an older white man reeks of "we need an old white guy to win" & we don't. Personally I think HRC made a bad choice with Tim Kaine.
Tim Caine was a ...what? Who is that? Since then I've gotten to respect him. But I think she could've made a better choice. That said, too much was working against Hillary, whom I loved and supported.. I have even MORE enthusiasm for Kamala!! I like Beshear, I think the list is great for her to choose from. But we know who Andy is!!!
travelingthrulife
(5,176 posts)He has to take a lot of crap from the Republicans in public office there. He handles it well.
Emile
(42,250 posts)vouchers. We need a progressive like Biden to advance this country forward.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)and there was the bridge miracle. I'm not going to dismiss him over the school voucher issue. Less Progressive than Kamala is called for here.
But I like the idea of excitement that either Shapiro or Beshear could bring (or Whitmer).
i just hope we don't go for Mark Kelly over some idea that the woman nominee needs a military/astronaut older guy to give her gravitas. He's great but we need him in the Senate. We need fire on the campaign trail.
standingtall
(3,148 posts)and has repeatedly campaigned against them as well as veto such legislation proposed by Kentucky's republican controlled State Houses. Or did you have Shapiro in mind there.
Emile
(42,250 posts)MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)electability is what I care about. Kamala is already pretty Progressive. They might be wanting to balance the ticket. Beashear would be fun and exciting but they might be looking for older and moderate to balance the ticket.
Emile
(42,250 posts)many more years do we have to keep believing that, because I don't have that much time left?
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)These are the hard knocks of democracy. I was really excited about McGovern. I thought Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry were terrific. I balance my excitement now. I ask if my candidate can speak like FDR, JFK, B.Clinton, or Obama. And then I try to see them in the lens of the general electorate, not jut my bubble. Because if not elected, we have the other guy.
Emile
(42,250 posts)TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)Emile
(42,250 posts)campaigned for him, because he ran as a moderate.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)and Sanders would stump for about any nominee.
He made a lot of appearances for Clinton too. He campaigned for Obama. He probably campaigned for Kerry, I don't recall though.
Bernie campaigning for a Democrat is not evidence for this case.
He wasn't campaigning for him in the primary, he was running against him and they did not share a lane.
Biden essentially ran on normalcy and Chump being unfit and incompetent not as a leftist.
Any mild veering left in the campaign had about 45 or 50 years of middle of the road cover and significant pressure from Warren and Sanders as well.
Where Biden moved left was in office but left was also the rational, sound action rather than just based on ideology or political orientation in any significant way.
Emile
(42,250 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 25, 2024, 07:12 AM - Edit history (1)
?si=_rSy_wfFTlaHOK_pMadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)and there wasn't a normal campaign so the usual measures don't apply
jmowreader
(53,180 posts)Trump "balanced" his by picking an even worse fascist than he is as a running mate.
Andy Beshear is an interesting choice because he's a progressive from the Deep South. This gives him more credibility with some people than, say, a moderate from New York or Illinois.
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)And maybe even get Stein in as opposed to Robinson the troglodyte as governor. Win win.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,351 posts)He knows how to speak to the West Virginia in the middle. Those are the people we've lost.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)but the low information voters who will decide our fates aren't paying much attention. Those in PA will know Shapiro who is overwhelmingly popular--in PA. They'll vote for who they know. We'll lose Kentucky anyway. I wish these weren't major considerations but they are.
I'm assuming Kamala and the party are assessing what it will take to win PA. Without PA, we lose.
M
epreic01
(262 posts)Could win us Pennsylvania, but lose us Michigan.
I also dont think choosing someone to help you carry a state is a good strategy.
Biden needed to win Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, but he picked a senator from California. That communicated to voters, Im choosing someone I think can run the country and can lead the next generation of democrats.
Big Blue Marble
(5,691 posts)It is the reddest state in the nation.
Buckeyeblue
(6,351 posts)My comments are more nuanced that in swing states he can speak to the "west virginia" type of voters. And maybe sway some.
cannabis_flower
(3,931 posts)The One Vice Presidential Pick Who Could Ruin Democratic Unity
https://newrepublic.com/article/184151/one-vice-president-ruin-democratic-unity-josh-shapiro#
On paper, its understandable why Shapiro is among the leading candidates reportedly being vetted by Harris. Like nearly all of the veep contenders, hes a white male governor with a centrist reputation. At 51, hes even younger than Harris and a fresh face, having only held his current job for 18 months. He has already shown himself to be a more than capable administrator, generating a lot of good publicity for repairing a damaged section of Interstate 95 within two weeks. Most importantly, Pennsylvania is the most valuable swing state in play, worth 19 electoral votes, and Shapiro is very popular there.
Unfortunately, Shapiro also stands out among the current field of potential running mates as being egregiously bad on Palestine. Its not just that he, like many Democrats, is an outspoken supporter of Israelthough he certainly is, having championed Israels war against Hamas consistently and without any apparent concern for Palestinian civilians. Shapiro has, moreover, done far more than most Democrats to attack pro-Palestine antiwar demonstrators, in ways that call into question his basic commitment to First Amendment rights.
In his previous role as Pennsylvania attorney general, Shapiro championed the states constitutionally dubious anti-BDS (boycott, divestment, sanctions) law against Ben & Jerrys after the ice cream maker refused to license its product for sale in Israeli settlements. BDS is rooted in antisemitism, Shapiro wrote in a statement in 2021, as he condemned a company named for its two Jewish American founders. The stated goal of this amorphous movement is the removal of Jewish citizens from the region and I strongly oppose their efforts.
We could win Pennsylvania but lose Michigan.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)We need them excited and enthusiastic, not angry about Shapiro's alignment with Netanyahu's brutal policies and views.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)Biden stepping down should free us of the Gaza issue and Shapiro might make it worse. Darn.
Michigan might go for a Jew ONLY if he had stood up against Netanyahu and Biden's unquestioning support for too long
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)As far as I know, he has not expressed sympathy or regret about the tens of thousands of innocents that Netanyahu's Israel has brutally slaughtered and starved. He's way too divisive. We definitely don't need that!!!
epreic01
(262 posts)Has been a strong supporter of Israel from what Im hearing and would turn off the voters we need in Dearborn Michigan.
Also the school voucher thing is unpopular with educators.
Could be wrong. Just going off of hearsay
Indykatie
(3,868 posts)I'm prepared to embrace whoever she selects. No matter who she chooses there will some disappointment because we all have our favorite to be on the ticket as VP. It seems that Shapiro, Kelly and Beshear have the most support based on internet buzz. I'll be surprised if it isn't one of these 3.
hlthe2b
(113,913 posts)They all have their individual strengths to bring to the ticket. Among his is his ability to call JD Vance out on his Bullshit in the most direct way possible. He actually KNOWS and understands these people. Terrific political skills too.
pat_k
(13,333 posts)...IMHO, Mark Kelly makes for a stronger ticket with his skills communicating effectively on border security and sensible gun control.
I'm very afraid of putting his Senate seat at risk, but I think he would do the most to shore up perceived weaknesses a lot of Democratic candidates have. With a strong national message chances of winning the Senate and House may be increased, and reduce any risk to Arizona's seat.
It would be fun if his twin were as politically savvy. Could run him as a replacement. What a hoot that would be !
On edit, as far as going all in on whoever she selects, that is a given!
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)when we have so much talent. Shapiro, Whitmer, and Beashear are also communicators. Republicans and undecideds are not policy wonks. They'll think young or old, boring or exciting. We need someone who makes Vance look like a milk dud not a new young star. I say Shapiro, Beshear, or Whitmer. I spent a couple of hours YouTubing all 3 (and Kelly) and I felt more inspiration and excitement than I have in a long time with the first 3. Kelly was solid, but we need more than that.
pat_k
(13,333 posts)I've argued that almost all the names being floated are doing great things where they are, and those whose offices would be at risk of flipping should absolutely stay where they are. I thought Roy Cooper would be a good pick. Lots of pluses, and term limited, so he couldn't run again anyway.
Then I learned more about how good Mark Kelly is on border security and sensible gun control. Giving him a national platform could shore up the party's perceived weakness in those areas, and that could help tip swing Senate and House seats down ballot in multiple states.
Bottom line. I vacillate. I don't think there is a clear call between potential risk and potential reward of Kelly as VP.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)on border and guns? Any Dem can point out that Trump killed the bipartisan immigration bill to keep the problem for the election.
I suppose I should look up what Kelly says to understand why he can do something different.
All of the candidates have a downside. Whitmer would be a shoe-in if the top of the ticket was male. Shapiro will bring PA but being Jewish might be an issue for MI. Anyone know his stand on Israel/Gaza? Beashear is exciting but young might not play well with Kamala getting dinged for gravitas for being a woman, and he brings no state. Mark Kelly seems not as exciting as the first 3, though very strong--but I still think the potential loss of a Senate seat should be disqualifying. Buttigieg--the most articulate but gayis risky and how many glass ceilings can we break with democracy at stake?
i should check out Priztger, Cooper more but haven't found them exciting so far. Unlikely either will bring us a state, but if they do, not as critical as PA and MI.
Man, this was easier when candidates were all white men and we were just looking at geography.
Upthevibe
(10,175 posts)I had read that Kelly's seat was safe until 2029 (January) due to the Dem. Governor being able to make an appointment.
Then an Arizona DU'er told me the appointment would only last until 2026.
I'm still not clear on whether or not Beshear would cause us to have a Governor's seat go from blue to red....That's a tough one for me.
pat_k
(13,333 posts). . . I thought Roy Cooper would be a good choice. Since he is term limited, it's not a case where an incumbent's office would be at risk if vacated. As chair of the governor's association he advocated less trump and more kitchen table -- an approach I applaud, and I think helped in the midterms. (I think endlessly demonizing Trump does more to unnecessarily alienate people who are turning to him for all sorts of reasons than change minds about him. It's all been said, and said, and said...) Anyway, Roy Cooper seems to have a reputation for successfully reaching across divides on those kitchen table issues -- a skill that could do us some good. Perhaps not as much good as Kelly's strengths on border security and gun control, but as a popular governor, having him on the ticket could put N. Carolina in play.
Who knows. She may end up picking someone for reasons that aren't so calculated -- someone she just "clicks" with.
We always get very caught up in VP selection. Fun for us and the analysts, but sometimes I think the VP pick doesn't actually change the dynamics of a race as much as we might expect.
yardwork
(69,352 posts)I think that he would be a great choice.
Also, my governor Roy Cooper from NC would be a great choice.
pat_k
(13,333 posts)With the added plus that he's term limited so there no risk of seeing an incumbent democratic office flipping if vacated.
I tend to favor Mark Kelly, for the reasons noted in previous posts on this thread.
Mainly, it is great that there are so many good options.
MiKenMi33
(231 posts)As a resident of Kentucky, Id like to keep Beshear as Governor. Hes done so much good for this state and has more to do. Rather than VP, Id like to see him run for McConnell or Pauls seat in the senate. Theres no doubt hed win in this bright red state.
MadameButterfly
(4,039 posts)A Dem senator from Kentucky! needed for our senate majority. But perhaps tragic for Kentucky
steelyboo
(887 posts)Wholeheartedly agree that replacing the Turtle would be the best thing Andy could do for the state. Since McConnell is hanging it up, Andy would not have to overcome the incumbency that has keep the chinless bastard in office all these years.
epreic01
(262 posts)But RN Andy benefits from being able to bring jobs to Kentucky and doesnt get hurt by his veto bc Republicans override his veto. When he starts having to vote on Abortion and Gay Marriage etc. he will fall out of favor
angrychair
(12,267 posts)I support our candidate and her VP choice and will defend it to my last breath.
TomSlick
(13,006 posts)VP Harris will make the choice. I am confident she will make a sound decision.
Whoever she chooses, I'm behind the choice.
Politicub
(12,327 posts)I dont know much about him, so I really appreciate you taking the time to write it.
2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)If not, I say he should stay and influence governors to the left.
standingtall
(3,148 posts)If Beshear were the VP she would be the Governor of Ky at least until the next election cycle. Plus Beshear cannot be re-elected Governor again.
2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)yellowdogintexas
(23,693 posts)blueknight73
(337 posts)I no longer live in Kentucky, but still have two kids that do so naturally I follow the politics there. My oldest son has a good friend who is a Physician in Lexington and a hard core Republican. He grew up with Andy and went to school with him since Kindergarten.
My son was talking to him one day and asked him about Andy. The Doctor told him " I have known Andy all my life, and I will tell you, He is absolutely the nicest, most honest person I've ever known. He is the only Democrat I ever voted for in my life and if he were to run for the Senate or President one day, I would vote for him again."
I wish I could have voted for him, but I did vote for his father who was a great Governor.
yellowdogintexas
(23,693 posts)Andy to step in and run when Turtle's term expires. If not he can always run against Rand Paul
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)I understand that Beshear enjoys a great deal of good will, is popular and a "known" figure for the folks in Kentucky. Wouldn't it be the best path for the party, country and him personally?
epreic01
(262 posts)Republican legislator in KY has a super majority. Andy Vetoes their crazy bills, but they override his veto. They had a hard time running against him being so progressive, bc there was nothing he was able to stop with his veto. So he benefits from having a great personality and bringing lots of jobs here.
If he were a senator hed have a voting record that would probably get him in a lot of trouble. Kentucky elects a lot of Dems as Governor. But not to the Senate. His popularity may help him get one term as senator
. Would be better for the nation and in some ways for Kentucky if Andy ascended to VP and eventually Presidency.
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)could never figure out how Mitch could be reelected at the same time as the current Governor.
it has been a head scratcher!
Nanjeanne
(6,585 posts)yellowdogintexas
(23,693 posts)I watched his daily press conferences during covid, and was very impressed. He also teamed up with the Republican Secretary of State to work out a very effective plan to handle the election that year.
I have also met him and have felt ever since that he has national potential
The only fly in the ointment is whether he would want to leave office mid-term and leave the governorship to the Republican Lt Governor, when the Lege is already Republican.
Music Man
(1,664 posts)Jacqueline Coleman
yellowdogintexas
(23,693 posts)lark
(26,078 posts)We're lucky that way.
The Butler
(41 posts)I want the result of your poll on the VP choice
NNadir
(38,020 posts)...internal organs as State property will suffer by comparison.
I trust her judgement.
You know what? I was disappointed with Obama's choice because of all kinds of quibbles that turned out to show me up as a fool. History will record Joe Biden as another exemplar of the American genius of righting a disatrous Presidency by following it with a great one.
Miami Blue
(374 posts)kyburbonkid
(263 posts)As a Kentuckian, big thumbs up. All the choices are great so it will probobly be a flip of the coin decision I'm sure.
Dem4life1970
(1,056 posts)Shapiro(PA), Walz (MN), or Kelly (AZ) would be good too.
bdamomma
(69,532 posts)Beshear would be good.
kimbutgar
(27,245 posts)Emile
(42,250 posts)get the red out
(14,031 posts)Andy Beshear is wonderful, God knows how many people walking around today would have died during Covid if he hadn't been our Governor. Whoever Kamala sees as the best choice for her, I'm all in. But I am thrilled that Andy is getting a look. Count Gov Beshear out? As he would say "Ya'all can't be doin' that!"
phoenix_rising
(323 posts)Pete will always be my first choice, because hes Pete! But thanks so much for the info. I now know who my second choice is!
thesquanderer
(13,005 posts)I like Gore, but I'm not sure how many people have ever called him an "exciting" candidate.
A lot of comments here seem to be about this pick or that being less than ideal on some particular issue. I don't think a VP's stand on any issue is all that relevant. What matters more is, as you say, exciting. Dynamic, charismatic speakers.
I haven't seen a lot of most of these contenders speaking, but from what I've seen, Pete and Shapiro impress me most in terms of who I think will be the most effective campaigners.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)We do not need to lose that position.