General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJD Vance calls for taking away voting power from "people who don't have kids": "Doesn't this mean that non-
Maybe Vance means women without children only get 3/5 th of a vote??
I did turn up the volumn- Vance is actually saying this.
JD Vance calls for taking away voting power from people who dont have kids: Doesn't this mean that non-parents don't have as much of a voice as parents? Yes. Absolutely
Link to tweet
debm55
(61,066 posts)magicarpet
(18,824 posts).... if you have no children you get a free ride. No civil rights - not encumbered by any tax burdens.
A better deal than the 1% and the ultra rich.
Salvador Dolly
(71 posts)... in the notional Republican utopia.
Because public schools are basically gay, don't you know.
SWBTATTReg
(26,307 posts)Definitely NO. And you all of a sudden don't get the right to take my voting privileges away.
I know tRUMP wants to dump you, but NO. He's stuck w/ you, who is proving every day how unfit he is for upper office in this Country.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)lame54
(39,880 posts)Generally
I've always paid more for benefits in my health insurance that I didn't need. Didn't complain, because it's a Group Policy.
I've always paid my taxes that went to local schools that I didn't use. Didn't complain, because I support the community.
I've always paid my federal taxes that do not give me credits for breeding. Didn't complain because well, honestly that one irritates me.
I'm sick of the takers blaming the non-takers for their problems and wanting to subvert democracy for their own fucking reasons.
If you want to deny me my constitutionally guaranteed right as one American, one vote because I am not a parent well, expect a tsunami of blowback JD Punk.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)riversedge
(81,091 posts)Or AOC? Are there other childless Reps or Senators?
Someone gonna tell @LindseyGrahamSC
and @SenatorTimScott?
Link to tweet
Mossfern
(4,730 posts)How many votes do I get?
FakeNoose
(41,931 posts)H2O Man
(79,122 posts)I say we must take away voting rights of people who didn't have parents.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Next you'll be taking away voting rights of couches and dogs that get shot and dogs that get eaten and even people with brain worms. It might even lead to Jerk Dunderhead Vance losing voting rights.
ExciteBike66
(2,700 posts)The people with young kids tend to be younger themselves. I would LOVE it if Republicans gave less power to their core, elderly constituency and more to the more liberal young families!
wnylib
(26,218 posts)TBF
(36,859 posts)He's a great dad, but he didn't give birth to them.
Yale is probably wondering how on earth this one slipped through and was accepted into their law school ...
Oneironaut
(6,307 posts)Jim__
(15,244 posts)Vance is campaigning against the basic tenets of American democracy.
femmedem
(8,562 posts)He wasn't saying to take away nonparents' right to vote, but he was certainly saying that the votes of parents should be weighted more heavily.
From WaPo: "A year before JD Vance was elected to the Senate, he advocated for a novel way to enhance the political strength of families by giving parents the ability to cast tens of millions of additional votes on behalf of their children."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/24/jd-vance-parents-kids-voting/
Incredibly, the idea still has legs. From the same article:
"The idea Vance floated was fleshed out this month in a law review article titled Give Parents the Vote by Northwestern University law professor Joshua Kleinfeld and Harvard law professor Stephen Sachs. Giving parents the chance to vote on behalf of their children would profoundly alter the incentives of American parties and politicians, they wrote.
Vance has not reviewed the article, according to his campaign, and he has not publicly gone into the level of detail that the authors do.
There are more than 70 million children in the United States, according to the Census Bureau, and they account for nearly a quarter of the population. They have major stakes in climate change, the size of the federal governments debt and long-term policies, Kleinfeld and Sachs wrote. They wrote that allowing parents to vote for children has to be taken seriously even if it sounds like a silly provocation at first."
GenThePerservering
(3,487 posts)but I don't see it going anywhere.
Coventina
(29,793 posts)duncang
(3,767 posts)Im a grandpa does that mean I get to claim my kids and grandkids to get extra votes?
Edit: Do I also get extra votes for my kind of grandkids? My daughter donated eggs to a friend. Does that take votes away votes from their grandparents? How about nieces and nephews I consider them family. So Im really invested in the future.
milestogo
(23,136 posts)That means you, JD.
Attilatheblond
(9,019 posts)JD doesn't want anyone over, oh, say 46 to have a vote?
Abolishinist
(2,977 posts)A 16 year old has a child out of wedlock, who gets the vote of this child? Does the mother now have the right to vote, and twice? Or does this vote remain with her parents?
If a family gets an extra vote for their one child, is it split between them, 1/2 vote each? Or does each parent get an extra vote?
Can an undecided voter cast one vote for candidate #1 and one vote for candidate #2?
So many more questions. I really think VD JD should be encouraged to put forth his new election proposal!
JustAnotherGen
(38,074 posts)My property taxes should be reduced (since I won't be able to vote in school board and local elections) as well as my State and Federal Taxes.
Mr.WeRP
(1,098 posts)Klarkashton
(5,349 posts)The whole family gets to vote under the supervision of the parent. 10 kids? 12 votes.
JFC this is madness.
skypilot
(9,134 posts)...talking points from the Republicans. Now, on top of everything else, this asshole is pitting parents against non-parents.
Maeve
(43,476 posts)And everything I see "JD" I think "Juvenile Delinquent"
Cartoonist
(7,579 posts)She said only people whose grandparents were born here should be allowed to vote. That means none of the Trump family could vote.
My idiot racist brother sent me that, even though my paternal grandparents came from Europe.
Retrograde
(11,430 posts)every time I hear about JD Whatshisname. In the 1930s there was a series of detective novels featuring a sleuth named Philo Vance: they were not universally popular, and Nash had a short poem about it: "Philo Vance/Needs a kick in the pance".
Timeflyer
(3,768 posts)of a male. Those darn uppity women...
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Blue Dotty This message was self-deleted by its author.
TomSlick
(13,054 posts)The stupid is strong with this one.