General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSince anyone with a penis is a potential rapist there is only but one (or two) answers:
All male children should be aborted upon learning of the sex.
Genocide of the male sex.
Very tongue and cheek but I wrote a short story back in the seventies in which men were driven out of a matriarchal society due to similar reasons and then hunted and brought in for breeding purposes as the male children were culled and the male population kept in check and fear.
for those thusly impared.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)tj_crackersnatch
(82 posts)Even if it is 'sarcasm'. Am I missing something?
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Time to resume our regularly-scheduled cat-fighting...
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)that their paying gigs in support of Rmoney are over.
Time to restart the War on Women by making us out to be reactionary nutjobs just because we don't like rape or rapists.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)In places the ratio is actually 150 male children for each 100 female children. And that doesn't even factor in the extent to which female children in impoverished areas routinely receive less food than their brothers, as well as less medical care and education. It doesn't factor in that these girls are often worked much harder and are far more likely to be married off early or sold into sex slavery. It doesn't factor in that married women worldwide are one of the demographic groups with the most rapidly increasing AIDS rates--because their husbands are encouraged to be promiscuous while these women are expected to be ignorant and submissive when it comes to matters of sex.
But there is clearly no connection to patriarchal culture and rape. There is no connection between global conditions for women and conditions in the United States, where after all only 1-in-6 women is the victim of rape (and 1-in-33 men). And it is especially hateful to point out that, wonder of wonders, the vast majority of the perpetrators are male--because it isn't possible that the POINT of that observation is that there must be something cultural causing this, since no person in their right mind believes that that many men are inherent sociopaths--no, the point of such statistics is to set us up for the great holocaust of men that might come, some day, if the radical feminists that have the audacity to point out reality get their way.
The *real* problem isn't a global culture that devalues women and puts them at constant risk while denying access to basic autonomy and resources. The real problem is mean feminists making men feel bad about themselves by brokering the suggestion that maybe, just MAYBE, it often sucks to be born a woman in this world in a way that it does not suck to be a man.
Patriarchy--a silly fantasy by the fearmongers who want to attack our good and just way of life--just like global warming.
tj_crackersnatch
(82 posts)'The real problem is mean feminists making men feel bad about themselves by brokering the suggestion that maybe, just MAYBE, it often sucks to be born a woman in this world in a way that it does not suck to be a man.'
Whovian
(2,866 posts)To infer that one is more or less than the other is not a good thing. No link, just observation and personal opinion.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)(Oppression being defined as diminished autonomy and access to resources and power relative to men)
Historically, have women and men simply experienced unique joys and tribulations, or have women historically been in a position of subordination to men?
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)Anyone surprised?
Nay
(12,051 posts)Whovian
(2,866 posts)Female circumcision is against the law in many countries, gay rights are being discussed and given credence, we now have hate crime laws for race, religious and gender based crimes, MLK woke America up addressing Civil Rights in a way that changed all American lives especially in the black community, There are laws giving rights to the handicapped and assuring they have access to everything that those of us who have working legs do. Workers, the poor, the unions, the Jews, Latino/Latina migrant farm workers have been and are still being oppressed.
So, yes. Women have been suppressed. But inroads have been made from the days of suffrage to the ERA.
First cry of repression recorded in history:
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Oppression still exists and on a grand and overwhelming scale, as the things I mentioned in my original post on this thread make clear.
The question is not "is there less oppression than there used to be," but "how much further do we have to go." And on the flip side of that, will we ever achieve anything close to true justice if privileged groups, including men, cannot acknowledge that they are privileged? If men will not acknowledge that implicit in the disproportionate oppression of women is the disproportionate privilege of men, then there will never be anything even close to justice.
I do want to ask you: given that a good deal of evidence has been given that your tongue-in-cheek dystopian horror story for men has been the reality for women for generations, what kinds of thoughts does that stimulate for you? The fact that the kind of situation you present in your OP and short story is so far fetched for one gender, but virtually inevitable for another...does that have any effect on your thoughts regarding gender, sexism, rape, etc.?
FightForMichigan
(232 posts)and what's worse, willfully ignorant. Looking at the treatment of women around the world, you still stand by that statement?
Because maybe there's a lot you're choosing not to see.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:31 PM - Edit history (1)
can you document that? In some regions, there is a disparity, but I've never heard it anywhere near as high as what you claim.
Sid
antigone382
(3,682 posts)That is the upper end of the ratio (as I indicated by saying that "in places" it is "as high as" 150:100, rather than stating that is across the board; I would not claim that that is an overall figure). As I recall it is present in certain rural areas of China, but I will try to find the specific quote with a chapter and page number if I have time later on today (it is at home and I am currently out). However, there are wider areas where it is as high as 120:100.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)whathehell
(29,090 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)try reading the crime stories in the news sometime. A lot of scum and slime out there, and 99% are men raping, killing, and so on. It's a harsh but true reality.
Jeez when are these attacks on women for speaking out about the truth of our experience going to stop?
I guess it will only stop when we have been silenced.
I just expected better from a supposedly progressive website.
Prometheus_unbound
(57 posts)The frequency of rape in a society can and does change, just like any other crime (which, by the way, is also disproportionately committed by young males). And for the record, the USA rank quite badly on rapes, unless there is extreme under-reporting in all other industrialised countries. There's much room for improvement, and no, it does not require mass killing.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...was anywhere as good "Huston, Huston Do you Read" by James Tiptree, jr. (pseudonym of Alice Sheldon), where three astronauts from the 70's arrive in a future where there are only women, no men. I recommend anyone who wants to write a story about a world without men read it.
Interesting thing is, it's possible and the men won't have to be brought back:
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
From here.
Interesting how men who write such stories always seem to have the women regret the decision and bring them back, where as women who write such stories never have the women regretting it and bringing the men back. I don't know if it's in "Huston" or "Herland" (a similar story written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman written back in 1915), but in one of the two it's pointed out by a woman from the all woman society that, from what she's hearing, the only advantage men give women in a mixed society is to protect them from other men.
I don't necessarily agree, but it does make one think, especially if we look at societies where women can't go out without a male relative, etc.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)a book I really loved.
But thank goodness there is no "hatred of all men", or something, as these women imagine a happy world without men.
As for the short story from the OP, it is kinda absurd to have the women hunting down men for reproductive purposes. All they would have to do is say "yo, guys, we're available" and then they would need their weapons, not to hunt men down, but to beat back the undesirables.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)that assumes two things
1.) the majority of the men are straight.
2.) That the women making the offer are deemed - in some way - attractive.
REP
(21,691 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)they could be forcibly raped and bred for thousands of years.
Also, baby girls have been abandoned an left to die in some cultures for thousands of years as well.
Your fictitious short story about males has been the genuine real life story for females for many centuries.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)That is just being insensitive to the beliefs of those who fear the all powerful feminist boogey woman. You should respect their understandings of the world without shoving inconvenient things like facts or history in their faces.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)*Sigh*...it's my inherent, sinful female nature at work, I suppose.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Though I only use one "R," as in Zora Neale Hurston. She'sa very pretty tortoise shell with green eyes and a queenly bearing. Now there's a female who might murder and imprison a few men...or whoever and whatever gender happens to disrupt her imperial bliss on that day.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Which ones where those?
I doubt your statement, because the fact is, any culture that did that probably wouldn't be a culture anymore, because they wouldn't have been able to reproduce.
On the other hand, Sparta did do that, but they didn't care if was male or female, just if it was sickly. so no go there, I'm afraid.
Does it happen today, yes. china is the only country I know, due to thier one child policy.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)But the fact is that female children have long been considered undesirable and a waste of resources relative to male children around the world. Infanticide has been common in many parts of the world; China comes to mind, though they are not the only example of this. Even today there are places with incredibly imbalanced ratios of male to female babies, largely because of sex-selective abortion. In some areas it is as high as 150 males:100 females. In larger areas it is as high as 120:100. And the lives of women who are worked, underfed, denied access to medicine, education, political choice, and economic opportunities, who are married off as young girls or sold into the sex industry, are the lives of prisoners and slaves. Whovian's dystopian anti-male fantasy is a reality for millions of women and has been for some time.
I don't have the specific statistics handy at this time; I left such books at home. But I do have a link to a thread I made the other day that puts rape and female oppression in a global context, and I think starting with the cases I present there can provide some context that you can use as a starting point to do research on your own. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021914217
Confusious
(8,317 posts)I am full aware of what goes on today.
Cultures for "thousands of years"
Thousands of years is "history"
Ps. Just as aside, what "other places" have imbalances?
wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)Honestly, you can't be this obtuse.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Two countries. Not really "common in large parts of the world"
Got anything on that "history?"
antigone382
(3,682 posts)And they are not the only ones who have serious gender imbalances due to infanticide.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Got anything on that "history?"
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Confusious
(8,317 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)Its a girl, a film being released this year, documents the practice of killing unwanted baby girls in South Asia. The trailers most chilling scene is one with an Indian woman who, unable to contain her laughter, confesses to having killed eight infant daughters.
The statistics are sickening. The UN reports approximately 200 million girls in the world today are missing. India and China are said to eliminate more female infants than the number of girls born in the US each year. Lianyungang in China has the worst infant gender ratio on record with 163 boys born for every 100 girls. Taiwan, South Korea and Pakistan are also countries in which unwanted female babies are aborted, killed or abandoned.
Gendercide in South Asia takes many forms: baby girls are killed or abandoned if not aborted as foetuses. Girls that are not killed often suffer malnutrition and medical neglect as sons are favoured when shelter, medicine and food are scarce. Trafficking, dowry deaths, honour killings and deaths resulting from domestic violence are all further evils perpetrated against women. This femicide has led the Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces to report in Women in an Insecure World that a secret genocide is being carried out against women at a time when deaths resulting from armed conflicts have decreased.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)You keep telling me about today, and I am fully aware of what goes on today, minus some of the smaller countries.
If you can't provide the histories, then just say so.
Response to Confusious (Reply #45)
Matariki This message was self-deleted by its author.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)Summary
The phenomenon of female infanticide is as old as many cultures, and has likely accounted for millions of gender-selective deaths throughout history. It remains a critical concern in a number of "Third World" countries today, notably the two most populous countries on earth, China and India. In all cases, specifically female infanticide reflects the low status accorded to women in most parts of the world; it is arguably the most brutal and destructive manifestation of the anti-female bias that pervades "patriarchal" societies. It is closely linked to the phenomena of sex-selective abortion, which targets female fetuses almost exclusively, and neglect of girl children.
The background
"Female infanticide is the intentional killing of baby girls due to the preference for male babies and from the low value associated with the birth of females." (Marina Porras, "Female Infanticide and Foeticide".) It should be seen as a subset of the broader phenomenon of infanticide, which has also targeted the physically or mentally handicapped, and infant males (alongside infant females or, occasionally, on a gender-selective basis). As with maternal mortality, some would dispute the assigning of infanticide or female infanticide to the category of "genocide" or, as here, "gendercide." Nonetheless, the argument advanced in the maternal mortality case-study holds true in this case as well: governments and other actors can be just as guilty of mass killing by neglect or tacit encouragement, as by direct murder. R.J. Rummel buttresses this view, referring to infanticide as
another type of government killing whose victims may total millions ... In many cultures, government permitted, if not encouraged, the killing of handicapped or female infants or otherwise unwanted children. In the Greece of 200 B.C., for example, the murder of female infants was so common that among 6,000 families living in Delphi no more than 1 percent had two daughters. Among 79 families, nearly as many had one child as two. Among all there were only 28 daughters to 118 sons. ... But classical Greece was not unusual. In eighty-four societies spanning the Renaissance to our time, "defective" children have been killed in one-third of them. In India, for example, because of Hindu beliefs and the rigid caste system, young girls were murdered as a matter of course. When demographic statistics were first collected in the nineteenth century, it was discovered that in "some villages, no girl babies were found at all; in a total of thirty others, there were 343 boys to 54 girls. ... n Bombay, the number of girls alive in 1834 was 603."
http://www.gendercide.org/case_infanticide.html
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Focus (1): India
As John-Thor Dahlburg points out, "in rural India, the centuries-old practice of female infanticide can still be considered a wise course of action." (Dahlburg, "Where killing baby girls 'is no big sin'," The Los Angeles Times [in The Toronto Star, February 28, 1994.]) According to census statistics, "From 972 females for every 1,000 males in 1901 ... the gender imbalance has tilted to 929 females per 1,000 males. ... In the nearly 300 poor hamlets of the Usilampatti area of Tamil Nadu [state], as many as 196 girls died under suspicious circumstances [in 1993] ... Some were fed dry, unhulled rice that punctured their windpipes, or were made to swallow poisonous powdered fertilizer. Others were smothered with a wet towel, strangled or allowed to starve to death."
Focus (2): China
"A tradition of infanticide and abandonment, especially of females, existed in China before the foundation of the People's Republic in 1949," note Zeng et al.. ("Causes and Implications," p. 294.) According to Ansley J. Coale and Judith Banister, "A missionary (and naturalist) observer in [China in] the late nineteenth century interviewed 40 women over age 50 who reported having borne 183 sons and 175 daughters, of whom 126 sons but only 53 daughters survived to age 10; by their account, the women had destroyed 78 of their daughters." (Coale and Banister, "Five Decades of Missing Females in China," Demography, 31: 3 [August 1994], p. 472.)
I would appreciate acknowledgement that I have furnished both of your requests. Thank you.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)After much pain.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)In fact, I'd say "pain" is strangling your own newborn daughter, because as a woman you believe this is a better fate for her than growing up in a situation of constant oppression, abuse, slavery, and the potential for murder after marriage.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)There were many times I wished as a child that I was dead.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)FightForMichigan
(232 posts)Do you really mean to minimize the slaughter and abuse of millions of daughters around the world because you, too, had a bad childhood?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Interesting that every country has a higher male:female ratio at birth, but at age 65, there are almost 4 women for every 3 men worldwide.
Sid
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Note that the nature of the X and Y chromosome leads to a higher mortality rate due to genetic disorders for men.
Nevertheless, I would like to know what other factors you think play a role in this.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)We're talking about wholesale elimination of females before or after their births due to patriarchy in many parts of the world thoughout history.
Response to antigone382 (Reply #31)
Matariki This message was self-deleted by its author.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Almost one third, if I'm not much mistaken, we are talking about large parts of the world when it comes to women's lives. And it doesn't just impact the lives of women there, but also in their neighboring countries, like Laos, Cambodia, Bangladesh, where women are kidnapped and sold as brides to boys who cannot find a wife nearby....because the girls have been aborted or killed.
(Oh, and before you object to my categorizing these males as boys and not men, it's because a proper man wouldn't buy a wife like he does cattle. Historically, though, that's what usually happened, but you seem to have a history knowledge deficit, so you may not know that. These days, we call someone being bought and sold a slave, and any sexual intercourse that someone must have with their master rape.)
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Off the top of my head there is India, Thailand, and larger areas of East Asia. I think South Korea may be re-approaching gender balance but I'm not sure.
And I already mentioned the legacy of female infanticide in China. That was a longstanding tradition. Speaking of slavery, off the top of my head I can say that about one in forty female children in Cambodia is sold into sex slavery. Girls as young as three or four are raped, girls as young as eight have their hymens sewed together so that their virginity can be resold. Women are drugged, placed in cages, shocked, and gang raped as punishment if they refuse to comply. I recall a story of one girl who was punished by having her eye gouged out after she asked for a day off following a forced abortion.
Worldwide the number one cause of death for women of childbearing age is childbirth. The factors contributing to this are often that their growth is stunted due to malnourishment (something with disproportionately affects girls because boys will eventually become their families social security and are therefore fed better), early marriage (or rape) and pregnancy, lack of access to medical care, and lack of education. Not all women die; some just suffer complications that make their lives a living hell. Globally about 2 million women suffer from fistula, a preventable condition resulting from prolonged childbirth, in which there is a tear between either the rectum or the bladder and the vagina. It causes continual incontinence and painful infections, and the smell further stigmatizes these women and turns them into social pariahs. Fistula is a consequence of absolute powerlessness; if you don't call it de facto slavery, I don't know what to call it.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Pretty much the same as every other country in the world,
Unless you're saying it happens in America, Europe, the whole world.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Some of us pointed out that his nightmare scenario for men is a reality for many women around the world, and has been for some time. You asked for specific countries so we mentioned China and India, two of the most populous countries in the world--there are others and at present most of them are in South Asia, but the principle point, that girls are killed based on their gender, has been presented as a reality. I don't really know what you want in terms of proof that infanticide is not some brand new invention in these countries. The history is well established and I would think it would be obvious.
In addition, to the premise of males being captured and held as slaves for the purposes of breeding, I told you about the experiences of women around the world who are bought, sold, and traded into marriage or the sex industry. This is also well established, and it has historical antecedents that I would think would be obvious to anyone who was intellectually honest.
Evidence has been presented to you. If you choose to minimize it there is only so much that I can do.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)"The history is well established and I would think it would be obvious"
I don't ever take any person on the web word for something, otherwise I'd probably be owning a lot of shit in Nigeria.
you keep telling me about sex slavery and kiddnapping in those countries. I can guess at the reasons you refuse to answer the question, probably because "it's not obvious" but you keep posting things that have nothing to do with what I asked.
If it was "obvious" you probably would have answered my question by now.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Thousands of years is "history"
And tradition. And culture. Etc.
History is more than merely one thing, regardless of what bumper-stickers may say.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)another example.
If you are not aware of the many examples of females being captured and enslaved for forcible rape and breeding purposes, then I would suggest that you translate your liking of history into reading and study of the subject. I'm sorry, but I don't have time to do any more simple internet research for you.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)I am fully aware of today.
I just thought you might be helpful and point me toward these "histories," but you seem unable to do that.
Is it beneath you?
Zorra
(27,670 posts)antigone382
(3,682 posts)Confusious
(8,317 posts)Thank you.
That wasn't so hard was it?
antigone382
(3,682 posts)How I would like to know how you incorporate that history into your wider views of gender relations and the relative status of women on a global scale.
Also, the reason that I brought up other things apart from infanticide is because both Whovian's and Zorra's posts were about more than infanticide. They were also about subjugation and slavery.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)matter how many facts you present?
Confusious
(8,317 posts)They will be accepted and acknowledged.
Try it sometime.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)'Confusious' is being disingenuous. He started by demanding you answer about today - as if the oppression of women was something that only happened in the past or, 'he only knows of', today in China. Only after you provided him ample examples does he began harping about 'history'. He's playing a game. Asking for information that is common knowledge and if you don't wear yourself out answering him he thinks it proves something. What I'm not sure - that women never were and are not currently treated as less important than men (or worse)? That men "have it just as bad"? It's trollish behavior. And there's no real communication with someone like that. Whatever you provide him he'll just squawk "more, more. you have nothing".
Absurd.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Or do you assume?
I asked about history first, as an aside, I asked about where.
She provided lithe links to the history, so I am satisfied.
Your post says more about you then me.
Boy, my ignore is really getting filled up.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I certainly get nothing from your responses to my posts.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)(the term rape was meant to refer to "abduction" but of course rape would inevitably follow.)
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Nobody is saying that all men are rapists. What we are saying is that women are always fearful because they cannot tell if someone is rapist or not.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Instead of living in fear, I carry a few simple methods to protect myself.
There's a lot of implication that men NEED to take special courses. Coercive corrective courses are up to courts to decide.
retread
(3,763 posts)shoe fits!
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Instead of being passive-aggressive... be an adult and state it outright, please.
retread
(3,763 posts)a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)face consequences and rewards, like an adult.
retread
(3,763 posts)a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)consequences... being considered an adult, instead of a coward that hides behind insinuations.
Rewards...having people respect you.
That sounds like consequences and rewards to me...
But let's get back to it...
If you have something to say about me... instead of hiding behind insinuations, have at it.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)What about the guy that just started working in your office? What about your cousin? The girl you went on a date with? Your wife or husband? How about those two guys who came by when you were playing in a meadow on a sunny summer day?
No? Then you should know that women are not afraid of rape only when they're walking down dark alleys. Today, where I live, a 19-year old was found guilty of the rape and murder of a 98-year old woman in her apartment. He was the next-door boy that she had seen grow up. She opened the door when she saw it was him, because she never expected he would do something so heinous.
Women cannot protect themselves against rape all the time in all situations. I dare say you would agree with me that being raped is a bit worse than being mugged. It's not the case of "carry[ing] a few simple methods to protect myself."
I know that men can stop rape, because if the reluctant one in the last situation described in my paragraph hadn't given in to peer pressure, I might not have been raped as a 10-year old.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)1.) I'm sorry that you were raped. No one deserves that ever, in any way/shape/form/thought/word/deed/essence.
That said...
2.) FORCING people to take courses violates the recipient's free will. That kind of action is up to courts and the law in general. Also, it sounds about as effective as a 50's loyalty oath. Worse, it could and would engender a certain amount of reluctance to help victims and potential victims. (People live down to your stated expectations...)
3.) In any case where people start talking about forcing others to learn something, I ask a simple question: If I substitued the group and the learning material in question, would you be okay with the lack of free will? Maybe the Westboro Baptist church thinks that they are right. Maybe everyone in college should sit through a semester of their "studies."
4.) TV muggings often have a victim walking away. A lot of real life muggings require a trip to the emergency room.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)It's called school, and even if you home school, there are certain things your kids need to learn to pass tests. Otherwise, CPS can be called in and you may lose your kids.
I know that the US is mightily messed up wrt sexual education (whether it is a symptom or a cause of the general mess of American society, I cannot judge) but that is a good place to start. Or when learning anatomy or your rights in science and social science classes.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Putting "don't rape" themes in a civics class makes perfect sense, alongside other civil rights issues.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)If you want to go to college, there are plenty of required classes.
They aren't required if you don't want to go to college, so yes as an adult you have a right not to go to them. But if you attend that school, that school can indeed require a class.
Edited because I think most of us are talking about a discussion during orientation, not a class anyway.
retread
(3,763 posts)a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)and required courses can often be placed out of... or challenged. Also, a "required" course is generally there to further the education. For a realistic "don't rape" skill set, we aren't talking about a whole semester's worth of info. (situations, lead ups to evil choices, cultural differences, and facial expressions/mannerisms ought to cover it.)
Then there's the fact that YOU ARE STILL PAINTING ALL OF THESE YOUNG MEN WITH A BROADBRUSH. Why should someone help your cause, after you've implied that they are dumb or borderline evil?
BUT, if you are only seeking to "educate" college bound men, then you are missing quite a bit of the population.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)And alcohol is suddenly much more readily available too. I think it's a good place for that conversation.
No one is assuming all of those young man are rapists. But no one can look at them and tell which ones don't understand that taking advantage of a very drunk girl at a party is rape. You can make that clear when you start the discussion. "I know most of you are already well aware of this, but statistically we know a few of you aren't, and we have know way of knowing which few."
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Alcohol IS a problem on campus. Specifically, the "forbidden thrill" mixed with the near total lack of understanding is a problem. (I can't understand the attraction, but I'm weird.)
The class in general presupposes that ALL men in said class are possibly "that guy." THAT'S presumption of guilt.
I never understood the supposed attraction of drunk women at parties. (But again, I'm weird.)
gollygee
(22,336 posts)The women and the men in general should have this said in front of them too to help create an environment where they know to speak out when they see something happen. It creates less gray area. "What is happening?" Someone who wouldn't think to take a drunk girl into another room to rape her might not even recognize what is happening if they see a passed-out girl being taken into another room. They might assume the passed out girl is just being put to bed because she passed out. But after taking the class they might think to pay more attention.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)embed it in the crime prevention class framework.
One school I attended had us learn to spot potential dope burns. (No judgement on the part of the RA's and the staffers, just giving over some street wisdom.)
gollygee
(22,336 posts)A whole crime prevention class during freshman orientation that talked about a number of crimes including rape would be perfect.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Give female students some realistic training...
gollygee
(22,336 posts)about how her freshman orientation talked about how not to get raped INSTEAD of talking about not raping. Really I think a good orientation would include both. From one thread I got the impression at least one of the men posting thought that we were saying that it had to be one or the other and it would have to be talking about not raping with nothing said about avoiding being raped, but I don't think any women have said that at all. It's the total focus on what women should do to avoid it with no discussion of the crime itself that is troubling to us.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Telling people to NOT do something doesn't serve as a safeguard, unless you are setting up a documented legal paper trail...
"good" men will be disgruntled, and those who ARE evil will just learn some new rhetoric.
Personally, I'd have women learn an "executive protection" course, and a blend of Hard/Soft martial arts (with a LOT of emphasis on pressure points and easy break spots.)
gollygee
(22,336 posts)but it's part about creating an environment where the university has explicitly stated that it is rape and is not tolerated, for the benefit of the women and the men - including, as I said, the men who would never think to rape and might not realize what is happening, but might speak out about it if this environment is created.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)That's a paper trail.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I was looking for statistics in a discussion where a DUer said that men had a greater chance of being murdered and implied that that made men's lives more filled with fear than women. Of course, with 14,000 murders, of both men and women, and 90,000 reported rapes in the US every year.....
Anyway, a DoJ report said that in any academic year, 1 out of every 36 female college students was raped. That didn't include any rape attempts. In other words, every year 3% of all female college students in the US is raped, according to this report. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
It still breaks my mind to think about it.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)would you be blamed for it? Would the jury wonder what you were doing out by yourself at that hour? And why were you carrying something valuable, Bob? How do we know you weren't trying to give him a little cash, and then changed your mind and accused him of mugging you? You know, sometimes these things are just he said/he said, and I just can't tell what happened, and I can't ruin a man's good name by convicting him of something like this, can I? I'm voting not guilty and he's going to walk free. Better luck next time, Bob.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Sheldon,
As much as I like your rhetoric, this country was FOUNDED on the presumption of innocence until opposing proof. That's why I carry those simple items to stop a mugging.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)But somehow only rape victims are required to prove their innocence. If you were mugged, you would never be required to prove that you didn't deserve it.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)the point of this coercive class is more "consciousness raising..."
sigh...
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Whovian
(2,866 posts)They would think that all one speaks about here is rape. It is a terrible, tragic and horrific thing and is a heinous crime that should be addressed as such. But the discussions of late are reaching odd heights. Just three weeks ago you would see an occasional post on the subject but now it seems to be the "slow news" filler of the week. Maybe, in a less than obvious way, I was trying to say this.
zazen
(2,978 posts)I'm straight, so what's it to me? After awhile I thought, sure I support it, and I'll try to keep an open mind, but since I have heterosexual privilege and don't have to struggle with this day in and day out, I have the luxury of not needing to read every one of them. It was clear to me that this is _my_ privilege, _my_ luxury, _my_ job to understand better what the LGBT community faces, and when frankly I'm all worn out keeping up, I just shut up and don't choose to follow the threads. I would never _presume_ to jump in and tell people struggling with that that they're giving DU a bad image by the number of threads they create.
That's my guess as to how a non-rape supporting male might feel. Sure you care. You want to do what you can. You realize you have the luxury sometimes to turn the issue off. Sometimes you succumb to systemic privilege--we all do--and ignore it. What is weird is diving in and arguing with the community discussing the reality of their issues.
That's what we don't get. Why do non-raping men take women's concerns about rape so personally?
It's not about you, except that we want your help to live in a world where gender violence decreases (hell, violence of all kind, but we're focusing on rape in this case). So, help us determine who's a risk and who isn't. Help us identify these perpetrators up front. Use your leadership with other men to get them to change their attitudes. Take your creative energy to help rather than dismiss us.
rant /off/
countryjake
(8,554 posts)You really should post more!
JohnnyLib2
(11,212 posts)this trivializes the matter, even if inadvertently
Good question from WilliamPitt, above.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I really miss the unrec feature.
You have to be some sort of mental deficient to not understand why a woman, walking alone, might perhaps be wary of a strange man, or group of men. Are all men rapists? No. But the fact remains that almost all rapists are men.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Its recreating the events that lead to new species, said cell biologist Peter Baumann of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, whose new species is described May 3 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It relates to the question of how these unisexual species arise in the first place.
Female-only species that reproduce by cloning themselves a process called parthenogenesis, in which embryos develop without fertilization were once considered dead-end evolutionary flukes. But in the last decade, unisexuality has been found in more than 80 groups of fish, amphibian and reptiles. It might not be such a dead end after all.
Best-known among all unisexual species are Aspidoscelis, the whiptail lizards of southwestern North America, of which 7 of 12 species are unisexual. Genetic studies suggest their unisexuality emerged from historical unions of two sexually-reproducing lizards belonging to closely-related species, the hybrid offspring of which possessed mutations needed for parthenogenesis.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/05/all-female-lizards/
A little genetic engineering of humans should do the trick.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Poor men. Such victims.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)but I'd suggest looking in a mirror for one such troll.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Why don't you put me on ignore please. I don't like you.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)As to the rest of your comment:
Why don't you put me on ignore please. I don't like you.
Is that:
Why don't you put me on Ignore, Please?
or more of a suggestion?
nolabels
(13,133 posts)The women have brought this on themselves. Us boys were just helpless beings for so many of our early years.
I once sat on jury that put a rapist in prison for long time. The obvious motive was about suspects own perceived lack of person-hood and status. To me he was just another failure of our society. It was obvious we failed him long before he performed his dastardly deeds but he also seemed much too hardened and dangerous to get free anytime soon. I guess it is just another reason why we have to pay taxes
Yea, testimony from the victim was very damning and we hope the extensive conviction brought some resolution to her problems but reflecting back on case and how brutal it was, it's still kind of creepy
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)retread
(3,763 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine the person who allows only one (or two) solutions to any given problem is either dogmatic or merely an idiot.
2+2=?
=4, & =4+0, & =5-1, and many, many other solutions as well...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Response to Whovian (Original post)
Post removed
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Pax Vobiscum.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)man hating feminist of his infantile imagination. A quick search of past posts makes it pretty obvious.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=177869
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)I thought he/she was being serious.
I actually know some folks that are serious about such things.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)Why did you post this? What's the back story? Yes, I know, a story you wrote. But why did you post this here, now? What happened to you that prompted this topic?
Separation
(1,975 posts)Can you milk me?
Silent3
(15,265 posts)...we aren't safe from anyone or anything. Not even bunnies.
Tikki
(14,559 posts)a victim in any orifice of the human anatomy (male or female) with an object (penis, gun barrel, broom stick, whatever)
to afflict force, control and humiliation and often pain or death on the victim.
Men who have been physically or chemically castrated can still rape and a woman doesn't need a penis to rape.
Tikki
Dems50State
(147 posts)Let the slicing start! So where do I sign up for my free surgery to become a woman?
pecwae
(8,021 posts)I signed mine and still feel your post should have been hidden. Other felt differently.
********************
At Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:41 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Free surgery finally for us who are Transgender I love it
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1926996
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
This post repeats an ugly myth about mtf transgender people. See #2 on this list.
http://skepchick.org/2012/01/13-myths-and-misconceptions-about-trans-women-part-one/
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:52 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Very poor taste, but I don't think that bad. One of my employees was transgender: the surgery required was significant and difficult and nothing to be laughed at. As one of my other employees said, "it much be really important if X is willing to go through all tha that".
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: Insensitive and hurtful. I don't know what this poster is attempting with such a post, but he has failed. pecwae
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)The one I came up with at five years old?
I prayed (was brought up Lutheran) for God to make me be like my Barbie doll. No holes where people could hurt me anymore.
It has never occurred to me, all my life, to wish for men to vanish or be harmed as a group.
I only wanted to be safe.
I only want to be safe.