General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (rDigital) on Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:21 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Yupy
(154 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,760 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)the football game was on.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)Armed or not, it wouldn't have made a difference.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Arguably more damaging than the so called gun culture.
11 Bravo
(24,307 posts)We return you now to your regularly scheduled stereotypical broad-brush attack.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,443 posts)It's sad that there are those on DU that find the two incompatible.
Arcanetrance
(2,670 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)There are any number of people blaming the gun culture for all sorts of things. Then someone posted black vs white gun crime stats yesterday and the argument went racial. Just thought I would push back some
There are issues with the jock culture in both high school and college at places. Think Columbine. Professional athletes have been getting away with murder (literally) for some time. Its misogynist and exploitative.
I too was a student athlete, but thanks to very down to earth mother and well trained father, never took it to seriously. When I had to make a choice in college, I left athletics in favor of academics.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)given that there is exactly about ten minutes a year given over to discussing the violence of guns in America which is the leading cause of death in some demographics, I applaud his guts. Now go back to the game.
radicalliberal
(907 posts)... to marginalization or broad-brush attacks. No, that couldn't be true.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)911 what is our emergency?
We need a wwaaambulance.
rocktivity
(45,006 posts)You're supposed to call WHINE-one-one!

rocktivity
rDigital
(2,239 posts)[IMG]
[/IMG]
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Politics is life. Life is Politics
Football is life. Life is a football game (or is it baseball)
and football is our national pasttime
I think the repubs took Janet's wardobe malfunction and used that singular event to get rid of Dan Rather later on.
Plus ESPN hired Rush Limbaugh (though quickly fired him when he couldn't control his racism).
Plus Hank Jr. one of the most rightwing of rightwingers, sang the theme for decades and getting good face time on tv and keeping his name in view, and his views front and center
I have been to many concerts in my life
and mostly the crowd is with the singer, being that they paid good money to see them
but a few years ago, seeing Springsteen, all of a sudden a new kind of thing happened
Some(not many) yelled out- we paid our money to hear you sing, so sing and don't politic here
when he sang his "41 shots" song.
As Billy Joel sang "We didn't start the fire"
but it takes a spark to make a fire
and as Archduke Ferdinand found out sometimes sparks come in the most unobvious of places.
or as George Carlin posit'd "Football vs. Baseball"
In a war, anything goes. And football is war
(IMHO)
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)That he didn't please YOU is kind of neither here nor there.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Response to kelliekat44 (Reply #7)
ann--- This message was self-deleted by its author.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)sure....
Bob Costas doesn't reflect your view of the world of guns ergo he is a "moron". Wrong.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Unrec to high heaven your stupid OP.
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)... to be a "very good cause" but you find abhorrent?
Perhaps an anti gay marriage speech in the prop 8 days?
or a pro-Romney speech a few months ago?
Some folks think that those are really important and valid. It doesn't mean that football is the place for it.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)Costas spoke from the heart in front of everyone knowing damn well that he'd take some lumps from knee jerking, mouth breathing, shallow thinking, gun toting Umercans. Hell he put his job on the line to do so! That makes him a hero! I'm sure he is truly sorry he didn't mention you or your pet project during his limited allotted time.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)That's nice.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)a problem that must be solved, but guns are often used in that violence. Gun control is part of many solutions. Costas was exactly right.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)Wish the OP was able to grasp the connection.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Or anything else you listed would seem more political than a story about a NFL tragedy.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)BainsBane
(57,750 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:22 AM - Edit history (1)
Note that Russia has literally zero civilian handguns and their murder rate is in excess of 3x our murder rate. People will use what is available, but it's not the objects, it's the people doing the killing. A whole lot of them.
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)At killing than other methods. They make it easier, which is both their purpose and their problem. Sure the football player might have used a knife, but it's far less likely, particularly for suicide. There is far greater access to murder because of guns.
I'm not advocating to take your guns away. The court has ruled on the issue. But I don't have to like how common guns are in American society.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Japan's suicide rate absolutely trounces our total murder & suicide rate combined at 23.8 per 100k(Our suicide rate is 12 and our murder rate is 5.22). South Korea is even higher at 31.2.
They have no legal civilian handguns and almost no other civilian legal guns of any kind.
I think the media makes the problem seem bigger than it is. I think readily accessible mental healthcare is a more productive solution than whack-a-mole with our rights.
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)Sounds like a good start to me.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I think it was courageous. Saying that he could have addressed some of the other issues you mentioned misses the point. A football player did not die from poverty, inequality or the war on drugs. Possibly mental illness.
I may or may not agree with what he did, but I wouldn't call it moronic. Probably career suicide, though.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)srican69
(1,426 posts)If need a licence ( that needs periodic renewal) for a car - then I should damn well have the same requirements for operating a firearm. There are too many idiots with guns in this country and that is a FACT.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Just when you take it out on public roads.
I also don't see much about vehicles in the Constitution....
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)The Air Force
Congressional Districts
The Electoral College
Executive Order
Executive Privilege
Freedom of Expression
(Absolute) Freedom of Speech and Press
"From each according to his ability..."
God
Immigration
Impeachment means removal from office
Innocent until proven guilty
It's a free country
Judicial Review
Jury of Peers
"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"
Marriage
Martial Law
No taxation without representation
Number of Justices in the Supreme Court
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)It was a message that needed to be communicated.
The fact you didn't want to hear it? Well that's your own damn fault.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)Make sure it is thoroughly vetted by Democratic Underground user rDigital to ensure it conforms with his/her belief and value system.
That is all.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)FSogol
(47,609 posts)insulting guns?
rDigital
(2,239 posts)mfcorey1
(11,134 posts)rtassi
(629 posts)for Bob to use half time to editorialize ... it was after all related to persons involved in the very sport being broad casted .. to say nothing of the suicide taking place on the property and in front of his organization. It will never be determined to anyones satisfaction if the killings would have taken place had a gun not been present or readily accessible ... but that it was, is evidence enough of the inherent dangers of emotionally unstable persons having access to guns ... professional athletes or not ...
I applaud Bob for the courage it took, knowing that the reactionary and fearful would blow a gasket and view football as exempt from societal commentary ...
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)BainsBane
(57,750 posts)Seriously though, I think some sportscasters are brighter than their counterparts in the news division.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the earth is not flat, etc., before others.
I applaud him for making something of his "position" other than just sports.
regjoe
(206 posts)on national television.
If he felt he had to open his trap, he should have blabbed about what this event was truly about: violence against women.
It's funny: costas whines about a Constitutional right and whines about government not taking it away, but posters say you are the one who needs the waaaaaaaaambulance. LOL!
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)regjoe
(206 posts)Used often by those unable to dispute facts.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)You mean the epidemic problem with gun violence in this country?
Those kind of facts?
Archae
(47,245 posts)Canadians have nearly as many guns as those in the US do.
So why does Canada have so many fewer deaths?
I'm sick and tired of this "If we have gun control, everything will be all hunky-dory!"
Criminals who BY LAW aren't supposed to have guns, are arrested with them.
Guns do not cause violence.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)So that would make perfect logical sense.
But nice try.
Archae
(47,245 posts)And what exactly are those laws?
And which of those laws have counterparts in the US, like felons being forbidden from having guns?
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)Individuals who wish to possess or acquire firearms in Canada must have a valid possession-acquisition, or possession-only, licence (PAL/POL); either of these licences allows the licensee to purchase ammunition. The PAL is distributed exclusively by the RCMP and is generally obtained in the following three steps:
1.Safety training: To be eligible to receive a PAL, all applicants must successfully complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course[15] (CFSC) for a non-restricted licence, and the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course[16] (CRFSC) for a restricted licence; the non-restricted class is a prerequisite to the restricted licence. The RCMP publishes information on the locations and availability of these courses.[17]
2.Applying for a licence: Currently only one type of licence is available to new applicants, the possession-acquisition licence (PAL). People can request a PAL by filling out Form CAFC 921.[18]
3.Security screening: Background checks and investigations are performed. All applicants are screened, and a mandatory 28-day waiting period is imposed on first-time applicants, but response time may be longer.[19]
Licences are typically valid for five years and must be renewed prior to expiry to maintain all classes. Once licensed, an individual can apply for a firearm transfer;[20] and an authorization to transport[21] (ATT) for restricted firearms.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
The NRA would crap its pants if we ever suggested doing something similar over here.
Archae
(47,245 posts)This was shown quite emphatically in how much the NRA spent on this election, and how badly they did.
Those laws look like they make sense, and should be put into place here in the US.
And fuck the NRA and their hysterics.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)So if not the NRA, what's stopping states from enacting measures similar to those in Canada?
Archae
(47,245 posts)Hysterics from gun nut groups like the NRA.
And believe it or not, the NRA is not the worst.
Just look up "Gun Owners of America" and their leader, Larry Pratt.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)On the one hand, the NRA doesn't have the power that it used to.
But on the other hand, common sense gun control measures are being blocked because of opposotion of the NRA and other gun advocacy groups.
Can you elaborate? I'm not being sarcastic; I'm just curious as to your angle here.
Archae
(47,245 posts)There's also a great deal of hysterical propaganda being spread by the gun nut groups, just look how a UN bill to stop the trafficking across borders of guns has in the eyes of Wayne LaPierre, morph into a "UN plot to grab our guns."
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Spazito
(55,431 posts)NO conceal/carry; severe restriction on handguns; etc, etc, etc. You actually make a good point FOR sensible gun control by pointing out the vast differences in the number of deaths per capita between Canada and the United States even though your intent was the opposite.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)the stereotyped Cowboys beating the indians with their gun vs. the bow and arrow
I don't remember Dudley Doright having a gun though
People in Canada had Canadian Mounties, but not the image of the gunslinger
as Johnny Cash sang"I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die"
c)
Guns kill directly.
and its legal guns that make illegal guns impossible to get rid of
most of the major events were from legal guns, betcha this one was too
The tea party showed what it showed.
Can anyone imagine if the Rev. Farrakhan's million man march had 1 million people stroking their guns like the tea party did outside town halls (and then Gabbie Giffords was almost killed and a judge was)
It is the glorification in America of the gun
the entire issue needs to be reframed
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)Are you suggesting we get rid of them?
frylock
(34,825 posts)there was nothing factual in anything you posted.
Fact: Costas preached his fears and politics during a sporting event on national television.
Fact: Control over a woman was the cause of this tragic event and violence against a woman was the result.
Fact: The 2nd Amendment is a Constitutional right.
Fact: Pro 2nd Amendment supporters fear losing their right. Anti rights people fear inanimate objects.
Debatable opinion: Costas is a moron.
frylock
(34,825 posts)i give you another week here, tops.
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)Of hearing anything that states the obvious: guns kill. No one is taking away your guns. You people are messianic. It's not enough that you have personal arsenals and that thousands of people die every year so you can play with your guns. But you feel you shouldn't have to be subject to hearing the views of others. You won. The court places your right to bear arms above my right to safety. We don't like it but there is nothing we can do about it. So you hear some bitching once in a while. Deal with it. WTF are you complaining about anyway? What more do you want? Mind control?
Not sure where you get that I am afraid, but I am not.
Anti rights people can preach all they want, but they should use facts, not their personal opinions. Halftime of a football game is not the time or place to preach your fears.
Yes, the court has maintained that our 2nd Amendment right, which has been around since our founding btw, is above your fear.
I deal with your fear on a daily basis and, to be quite honest, I find it amusing. But that in no way means that I aim to prevent you from your whining. I know the 2nd Amendment isn't going anywhere.
What am I complaining about? Costas preaching anti 2nd Amendment rhetoric on national television during football and trying to pass it off as fact. If he want to preach his political opinions he should do it on political shows.
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)To make the obvious statement that guns kill people? There is never the right place as far as you folks are concerned. Why not be honest? You don't believe anyone should be able to say anything about your sacred guns ever.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)As in having the capability to shoot a sharp projectile at the speed of sound which has the ability to cut through human flesh. That's pretty damn animate to me.
And that's not just an unintended consequence of the purpose of this so-called "inanimate object." That's its intended purpose.
We aren't talking about a stepping stool, or a toaster over, or a--I'll say it--car. (Because I know how much all you gun enthusiasts love to draw comparisons between car deaths and gun deaths as if they were any way remotely similar.) We're talking about an instrument which is designed exclusively for killing, injuring, or the simulation of killing/injuring.
You talk about fear of guns, and maybe that's you gun enthusiasts' problem. You don't think we should be afraid of them. Not even a healthy, logical, rational fear. Anything that has the ability to take a human life should be viewed with a bit of caution. And anything that was designed with the specific purpose of having the ability to take a human life should be viewed as extreme, as out of the ordinary, as something not to be trifled with except in only the most exceptional of circumstances. Collecting guns as if they were baseball cards, carrying them around as if they were your wallet in your pocket, chalking it off as simply your "right" without regard to potential consequences or problems down the road--it is an unhealthy obsession, a delusion.
So forgive me if I have just a little fear of your precious "inanimate object."
MountainMama
(237 posts)+infinity
regjoe
(206 posts)Yes, it is an inanimate object. It cannot cause harm on its own, but it can be used to cause harm.
I'm not the type of person to trivialize your fears and desires with comparisons or what if scenarios. Guns are designed to be used to kill and are used to kill. But, as Americans, we have ALWAYS had the Constitutional right to have them. So the question is, do we strip that right from all in order to please the few? I say no. Especially seeing how the places with the strictest gun laws are also the ones with the most murders.
Seems to me that the people who are so paranoid about what MIGHT happen, but more than likely won't happen, are the ones with an "unhealthy obsession or delusion." Living in constant fear that SOMEBODY, SOMEWHERE, may be "collecting" guns or, heaven forbid, "carrying" one around.
Look, the fact is that the 2nd Amendment really is simply our right and its not going anywhere. With rights come consequences. Yes, there are some holes we can fill, but it's one of our most regulated and controlled "rights."
If it really does scare you that much, then by all means work to get rid of it. It will be a wasted effort, but at least it might make you fell better.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)You say it's a regulated and controlled right, but if anyone attempts to regulate or control guns, you'll go on and on about infringement and gun grabbers and so on and so forth. The fact of the matter is very few here or anywhere are advocating for a total 100% ban on all firearms. But many of us want restrictions, whether that be in the types of weapons a private citizen can own, the steps one must go through to obtain one, the steps one must go through to keep one, for some perhaps the amount of guns a private citizen can own, where that gun can and cannot be carried. There's not necessarily a consensus, except amongst the most fervent gun enthusiasts, and that is that it is all bad, and we're all a bunch of pansy "nanny staters" yada yada yada.
And you talk about fear, but it seems to me the ones living their lives in fear the most are the gun enthusiasts. Everyone's a potential robber, every person is a potential mass murderer, and you and only you can be John Wayne and save the day with your trust old sidearm forever at your side. It's thinking like that where you see a 17 year old unarmed kid dead for no reason other than he was wearing a hoodie in an unfamiliar neighborhood. That's fearful thinking for you.
On the other hand, I choose not to have a gun in my house. I know I live in a safe neighborhood with very little history of violent crime and the likelihood of a violent home invasion in my home is slim to none and does not justify me bringing in an instrument specifically designed to cause death or injury into my house, which I share with my wife and two young children. And I know in that very slim chance of such an event, I do have a 34 inch solid aluminum Easton baseball bat under my bed that I'm quite comfortable in using. And it's cheap, doesn't require a license, and probably wouldn't attact the curiousity of any children using it for any reason other than a pickup game of stickball
And yes, I will call folks like you "gun enthusiasts." It's what one calls a euphemism. My preferred phraseology involves the combination of the word "gun" and a certain crunchy organic snack food found in bowls at bars and such, but I'd rather keep it civil here.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)BainsBane
(57,750 posts)He made the simple observation that as long as guns are ubiquitous, lots of people will die. Guns kill. That is what they are created to do, and they perform the task quite efficiently.
BainsBane
(57,750 posts)Paranoid much?
BeyondGeography
(41,075 posts)He might even be smarter than you.
Archae
(47,245 posts)I just wanted him to shut up.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Because I'm sick of the gungeon crawling into GD.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)As for the accusation that he is a moron, I'm inclined to used the word "projection" and leave it at that.
Response to rDigital (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to rDigital (Reply #125)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Response to rDigital (Reply #143)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)So, missing the gungeon a little? You won't find as pleasant an atmosphere here for the gun types.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)He Spoke The Truth! Like it or not.
Viking12
(6,012 posts)or some other made up outrage?
Ian David
(69,059 posts)
Response to Ian David (Reply #36)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)Costas' choice to say what/when he did was appropriate to the immediate tragedy and the corrosive gun culture that cheapens life in this country.
The only people who would flip out at Costsa' common-sense remarks would be an NRA nut.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)He's gone now.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)It must be huge
rDigital
(2,239 posts)who have played in the NFL is 6x the national average.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/opinion/bruni-pro-footballs-violent-toll.html?_r=0
sarisataka
(22,650 posts)and I am sure he spoke his opinion with the full knowledge and approval of the network. I believe he had a greater failing in reading someone else's words rather than his own. That I would have respected more.
And I agree there is a massive disconnect in the NFL. They push players to deliver the most exciting (violent) product they can deliver while claiming to be concerned for their health. I believe that concern ends when the player's career ends. They disavow any long term problems or when the violence spills from the field into a player's personal life.
The players are further enabled by the NFL, their teams and the legal system for the slap-on-the-wrist treatment we see a dozen or more times each year when they get in trouble with drink, drugs or 'altercations'.
Agree completely, even to add that guns are not solutions to everyday problems and must be handled with the utmost care would have been ok. To say that neither would be dead if not for a gun and the implication that the gun made him do it is merely excusing the violent action and avoiding the tough question of 'why'
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Don't talk about Gun Club. Thanks for the reminder, Gun Guy, I almost forgot.
Lex
(34,108 posts)malaise
(295,770 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)BainsBane
(57,750 posts)a gun did. Costas' point was entirely appropriate. What is astounding is how rare such observations have become in this country. The rest of the world, rightfully, believes the US is insane in its profligate distribution of weapons. Naturally thousands of people die over meaningless arguments--like loud music--when people have guns. It's an obviously point. What is moronic is that you pretend otherwise.
Americans have little choice in these matters. SCOTUS has ruled the Second Amendment means your right to arms is more important than my right to safety. But that doesn't mean I have to be happy about it.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,443 posts)Looks like no one agrees with you.
Politicub
(12,327 posts)Good. Means his message is cutting through the clutter.
otohara
(24,135 posts)expendable people, expendable jobs, expendable children, nobody gives a shit so shut your mouth, USA USA USA!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)That is just sad. And so are you.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)How many home runs could Babe Ruth have hit without a bat?
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)You're not the first, and I'm sure you won't be the last.
Welcome to the rest of DU
mike_c
(37,045 posts)For obvious reasons.
watercolors
(1,921 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)I guess you don't agree with him, but he's not a moron.
4_TN_TITANS
(2,977 posts)the irony of him talking about gun violence while taking a break from football violence was completely lost on me. Costas is not a moron, but point well taken.
GoneOffShore
(18,018 posts)Response to rDigital (Original post)
Post removed
Response to rDigital (Original post)
ann--- This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)After the last couple of days watching people sniping on each other it's good to see an OP bring DU back together again.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Skittles
(171,564 posts)you poor, POOR baby
Demonaut
(10,068 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)than the culture around machines designed specifically to kill.
Got it.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)has scarred your fragile little mind.
He should commit hari-kari right now!
rDigital
(2,239 posts)spanone
(141,523 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)the darkside of The NFL. It's a Pot-meet-Kettle kinda thing.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)of moron is "intelligent, articulate, interesting, compassionate, and well-informed" then yeah--what a fucking moron.
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)like Ted Nugent, John Lott, Mary Rosh, Masaad Ayoob, Larry Pratt, Glenn Beck ect...
He's only a respected journalist and the face of an entire network's sports division (what a loser!). Apparently, anyone who wants to be taken seriously in the gun nut community needs to deal in blatant falsehoods, false-equivalencies, and right-wing conspiracy theories.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The NFL hates controversy and this is controversy...
Costas has already backpedaled somewhat: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021927990
If he was truly concerned about domestic violence in sports, he could have started with his ex broadcast partner
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)I've noticed citing an 18 year old incident is the go-to argument for gun nuts who don't want to discuss the issue at hand.
Best part of all this is seeing idiot gun worshipers become further unhinged over the fact that they can't get NBC to discipline or fire one of the most respected men in his profession. Another welcome example of how the worst segments of society are losing control and influence.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)I hate how badly LAPD screwed up the case. They took what should have been a binary case and mucked it up so badly that it will never be settled.
One of the joys of being a large black male is that you have to live with the public perception of large black men. Bad deeds by black athletes have direct personal consequences for me.
I have zero respect for "journalists" Its a non profession, never has been. They are entertainers, often with agendas of all stripes.
I have little tolerance for professional entertainers, including athletes. I accord them no deference or respect I don't give the person next door. Drives some in their entourages nuts. Been a couple incidents over the years.
The key organization will be the NFL who hates controversy. If this dies away, I doubt anything will happen. The game yesterday was one of the first I have seen in quite some time, the show has come a long way
Response to rDigital (Original post)
Post removed
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)and I don't mean on DU, I'm fairly comfortable saying I might leave the NRA behind on that one but that doesn't mean I think Costas is even in moronic's vicinity. Smart people of good faith can disagree though I agree that the triage of problems is off base.
Costas went on a limb for this but is silent on much more pervasive and pressing issues and I am left wondering why this is so important when it is statistically small bore.
Moron? Not at all.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)broadcast is kind of silly. It isn't as though he was creating the issue out of thin air. It was the topic of the day in the NFL on Sunday.
On edit: And I would think that even if his commentary had gone the other direction, pointing out that the day before Belcher tragedy there was another murder suicide, in which a man--in this case, without a handgun--committed two murders and then killed himself on a community college campus in Wyoming.
alarimer
(17,146 posts)He was quoting someone else, anyway, and I largely agreed with what he said.
How many fucking deaths is it going to take? How many people have to die before we wise up?
This is a two-fold problem: domestic violence and guns. Too much of both.
The fact is that women who are murdered are murdered by their partners.The constant availability of guns does not help the situation.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)about what he should talk about.
Oh and, fuck your respect. I don't need it and sure doubt Costas does either.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Berserker
(3,419 posts)And welcome to the real DU where people think and not act like assholes in lockstep.
Thanks again rDigital for posting this. Most of the posts sound like 3rd graders and about the same mentality. Sorry if I offended any third graders in here posting.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)Bravo. Bravo indeed.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)my deepest wish that this destroys your career in TV, sports, journalism forever.
Granted... it probably wont (we can only hope), but just the same, you still need a fastball to the face.
frylock
(34,825 posts)costas isn't going anywhere just because a few meatheads are butthurt over an editorial.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)TOS violation for advocating violence. I hope admins take note. You're long overdue for a pizza.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)And wish him physical harm to boot.
You disgust me.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)bongbong
(5,436 posts)The Delicate Flowers (gun-nuts) need their guns. They're too scared to walk out the door without one.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Response to rDigital (Original post)
Post removed
rDigital
(2,239 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Neither do the Chiefs.
Because they still played the game.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Then and only then will they give a damn
crazyjoe
(1,191 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)to do with whether your suffer from the use of guns.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)Response to rDigital (Original post)
Post removed
Response to rDigital (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #158)
rDigital This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)And you restated it another thread.
1. http://www.democraticunderground.com/117284156#top
2. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=162303
And you did not answer the question.
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #164)
rDigital This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Truth hurts.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)MightyMopar
(735 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)to being the rule of law in 49 states.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)But he had every right in the world to say it. If you have a problem with sportscasters pontificating about non sports related topics your mute button can be your best friend.
You need to do a better job of choosing your battles. Don't try to defend the 2nd amendment by attacking the 1st.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)that it wasn't the right place. Sports are an escape from politics and all of the other stuff in life. Don't bring politics into sports, is my main idea.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)like a football player becoming unhinged, killing his girlfriend, then himself (right in front of his coach).. let's not interject THAT-- into the football game and interfere with our need to distance ourselves from reality.
Moving on....
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I'm sure he has been well schooled on not doing that on the air. If he had, it would have been his last network gig. It's like the veil of illusion between an actor and the audience. He's part of the magic show, and must not destroy the illusion.
The underbelly of sports scandals, the way tthe industry of the privately owned sporing franchises use public money for bringing along athletes to get into the professionals; the milking of property tax levees for decades and sales taxes for a private venue for private profit that the majority of people cannot afford, yet pay taxes on; the drugs and injuries and the reason players unionized and demand high salaries, as they are unable to do their work as long as other workers, and few survive in any condition to enjoy retirement.
It's out of balance, but that misery is supposed to be taken care of the unions and communities, but the game remains the same.
As far as crime, mental illness and poverty/inequality and the war of drugs, those are factors in violence of all kinds. Not just the 'sexy' crime with the gun or knife or fist; but the crime of lack of sane social policy and human rights. That is beyond Costa's pay grade and can't be brought up to people a half-time. Since they are there to have an 'experience,' not learn anything but some stats of how the teams that the public doesn't profit from watching, but diverts their minds from all those dreadful life lessons.
I don't think he's a moron. He's simply a symptom of the insanity of America, that millions or billions are being spent for this diversion, when the country's infrastructure is crumbling, schools are being lost, the environment destroyed and everyone's cheering and yelling for a ball they also don't own tossed by people they don't know, in a stadium they pay for and it goes on and one. There's a bit of the Roman sports arena in all of this, and it's all overhyped.
He didn't. by the criteria you are using here, dishonor the sporting industry, for the reasons you and I have just given here. He did bring up what has been on people's minds because of daily events and the media inducing fear.
This is not the beginning of confiscating the guns. That would be the only reason I'd see worth getting upset over.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Judi Lynn
(164,122 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)
All of the we're-all-gonna-die! sort whose policy is to keep their viewers in a constant state of vigilance in order to make them less able to reflect and more open to right wing brainwashing.
You know, those guys. And most of the networks are just Faux-lite.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)The 4 things listed, I agree.
However, the fact that guns kill more people in one year than Americans that were killed in Viet Nam and that the NRA has bought our legislators is the true crime.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"... is a moron."
A most standard response when faced with ideas which may impugn our sacred cows. Zesty.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)Sorry your culture is showing.
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)Remember something for me will ya', rDigital?
The electorate has changed; After Obama there will be Hillary; the Gun control discussion? it's gonna happen.
Pacafishmate
(249 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)Jury: poster has specifically stated this and has had a post hidden claiming just that. See here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=269047&sub=trans
This is not a "call out" or some kind of personal attack: it is a legitimate question based on the poster's own past replies.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)He had the microphone and took the opportunity to provide "HIS" opinion.
You may disagree with him and that is OK too, but because he used the tools he had to say what he wanted doesn't make him a moron.
It was a pertinent topic given the shadow the events of the previous day over the whole game.
Sports is what Costas does and his world was stunned, so he spoke out.
Can't blame him for that! All you can do is disagree with what he said.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Having a good old time agitating on a Democratic message board
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Take it to meta.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)You need to clear your head.
How about a tourney that lasts a year or two?
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)Calling someone a moron might as well call them something else no difference.
Your OP would have been far better received had you simply said you disagreed with what he said and made your case. You chose to go the name calling route which goes nowhere.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)I don't like most of what George Will has to say (except perhaps about baseball.) But I know he's no moron.