Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:33 PM Dec 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (rDigital) on Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:21 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

219 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) rDigital Dec 2012 OP
Calling the Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahmbulance for you! MotherPetrie Dec 2012 #1
He should talk about people like you and how to AVOID your NON-SENSE COMMENTS Yupy Dec 2012 #39
+1 :) n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #112
yeah. fuck that guy for giving five minutes to discuss an epidemic when roguevalley Dec 2012 #148
Or just call the family of Nancy Benoit Great Caesars Ghost Dec 2012 #117
Classic example of jock culture ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #2
I am very much a product of the "jock culture", and I'm also a proud progressive. 11 Bravo Dec 2012 #56
Me too. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2012 #68
Same here played football ans graduated second in my high school class Arcanetrance Dec 2012 #86
Sorry the sarcasm was lost on some ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #105
actually, he was addressing the murder death of two people by guns roguevalley Dec 2012 #149
I wonder if nonathletic boys who have no interest in sports are ever subjected ... radicalliberal Dec 2012 #218
oh, so he doesn't quote you, so you consider him stupid CreekDog Dec 2012 #3
Yes. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #127
I quoted him and I'll be he's not happy with me either: Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2012 #175
VVVVVVVVVV Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2012 #176
Oy... nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #4
Wrong number rocktivity Dec 2012 #16
Comments like these are far more effective with an accompanying illustration. rDigital Dec 2012 #100
You may be 100% correct about Costas, but, Sometimes, it takes a moron to move things Forward graham4anything Dec 2012 #5
There is always another topic to address in this godforsaken nation. But Costas said what he felt. WinkyDink Dec 2012 #6
We all have our opinions. That's why we're here : ). nt rDigital Dec 2012 #102
If you don't love the gun, that makes you a moron??? nt kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Dec 2012 #84
Yeah, that's exactly what he said.... PavePusher Dec 2012 #107
LOL! Spazito Dec 2012 #8
Unrec...he advocated for a very good cause... joeybee12 Dec 2012 #9
+1 BainsBane Dec 2012 #53
Would you be as excited if he had advocated for what others believe... Lightbulb_on Dec 2012 #94
Fail! jorno67 Dec 2012 #10
He's a moron because he doesn't share your fetish? 99Forever Dec 2012 #11
There are many purist on DU that can't see a larger picture. Domestic violence is bluestate10 Dec 2012 #22
Hear, hear! Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #24
He was doing a story on a sports related tragedy. Railing against war on drugs seems more political. JaneyVee Dec 2012 #12
You're right, Mental illness and the NFL's cult of violence would have made better topics. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #131
Because violence and guns are entirely unrelated. BainsBane Dec 2012 #169
I see what you are saying. rDigital Dec 2012 #173
But guns are far more efficient BainsBane Dec 2012 #178
I can appreciate your perspective and I respect it. Here's more of mine. rDigital Dec 2012 #179
I am all for access to mental health care BainsBane Dec 2012 #180
A few of my high school friends might still be with us if they had received the proper care. : ( rDigital Dec 2012 #181
I don't think that what he did was moronic. Wait Wut Dec 2012 #13
May he go the way of Hank Williams Jr. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #128
Oh my - Gun toting tough guy is complaining about hurt feelings... srican69 Dec 2012 #14
You don't need a licence to buy a car, or to operate it on private property. PavePusher Dec 2012 #108
Other things not in the Constitution: Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2012 #116
You're so pleasant. I wish that DU had more posters of your caliber. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #129
It was hardly a "cheap shot." Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #15
Attention...um....world. Got a message? Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #17
We all have opinions. :) I'm no authority, it's all good. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #97
Unrec. With everything going on in the world, you get upset over a sports yakker FSogol Dec 2012 #18
Unrec. Your not caring doesn't make my point irrelevant. Also, note the recs. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #132
I respectfully disagree. nt mfcorey1 Dec 2012 #19
more then appropriate rtassi Dec 2012 #20
I'd be pissed too if a sportscaster had more common sense than I did. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #21
LOL BainsBane Dec 2012 #54
Why would anyone be mad about that? nt rDigital Dec 2012 #139
Costas is just over-the-head of gun culture. Kind of like those who saw climate change, bigotry, Hoyt Dec 2012 #23
Yes, he is a moron for preaching his fears and politics during a sporting event regjoe Dec 2012 #25
Unrec for stupid NRA talking points...nt joeybee12 Dec 2012 #32
Ah, the notorious "UNREC" regjoe Dec 2012 #40
Facts? Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #47
As Michael Moore pointed out... Archae Dec 2012 #52
Canada also has much stricter gun control laws than the U.S. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #55
If Canada does, why are there as many as there are in the US? Archae Dec 2012 #59
Just a brief sample: Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #61
The NRA no longer has the power it once did. Archae Dec 2012 #66
Good, then we agree on something. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #69
What's stopping them? Archae Dec 2012 #72
I'm not getting you. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #73
Mostly they are blocked due to bought-and-paid-for politicians. Archae Dec 2012 #74
So they do have power. Got it. n/t PavePusher Dec 2012 #109
probably wouldn't hurt to do some basic research before arguing against something frylock Dec 2012 #64
We have sensible gun control... Spazito Dec 2012 #60
Because Canada didn't come from the wild wild west idolize the gun culture graham4anything Dec 2012 #79
Men cause violence BainsBane Dec 2012 #172
what you posted was opinion.. frylock Dec 2012 #63
Nothing? regjoe Dec 2012 #88
opinion; opinion; fact; opinion frylock Dec 2012 #147
So why are you so fucking afraid BainsBane Dec 2012 #177
Hmmmm? regjoe Dec 2012 #200
Why is it anti rights BainsBane Dec 2012 #217
"Inanimate" objects that have the capability of becoming quite animate. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #188
Bravo!! MountainMama Dec 2012 #202
"Gun enthusiast?" LOL! regjoe Dec 2012 #204
The problem is, folks like you cry bloody murder on the "regulated and controlled" aspect. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #212
Unrec for using the term 'talking points" ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #41
he didn't mention the constitution or gun control BainsBane Dec 2012 #58
He didn't talk about any of that BainsBane Dec 2012 #171
He's a smart guy BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #26
So why did Costas do so badly during the London Olympics? Archae Dec 2012 #67
Unrec. HappyMe Dec 2012 #27
Good thing you don't GET to decide what issue he cares about and when he talks about it. phleshdef Dec 2012 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #29
Samesies! nt rDigital Dec 2012 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #142
No, just that I feel the same way as you do. Happy Tuesday. : ) nt rDigital Dec 2012 #143
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #146
Grow up ... he gave his personal opinion and I happen to agree with him .... MindMover Dec 2012 #30
I'm giving my personal opinion and I disagree with him. rDigital Dec 2012 #130
says the former gungeon member quinnox Dec 2012 #31
he went after the precious, yes he did.... dionysus Dec 2012 #33
Regardless; fredamae Dec 2012 #34
Don't you have a War on Christams to wage... Viking12 Dec 2012 #35
Dennis Miller would never have done that, right, Cha-Chi? Ian David Dec 2012 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #46
Dennis Miller is another moron, but not the subject of this OP. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #134
Quit Whining. You've Still Got FoxNews On Your Side. (nt) Paladin Dec 2012 #37
But you're okay with the late Charlton Heston's public posturing for guns, guns, guns? VOX Dec 2012 #38
You present a poor argument and a false dichotomy to boot. nt. rDigital Dec 2012 #135
Post And Run Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #42
Back now, did you want something? nt rDigital Dec 2012 #137
I want to hear more about the suicide states for former NFL players Capt. Obvious Dec 2012 #43
I guess it's not a big deal for you, but the suicide rate for men rDigital Dec 2012 #138
I don't know if I would say moron sarisataka Dec 2012 #44
First rule of Gun Club DefenseLawyer Dec 2012 #45
Great, get yourself a show and then you can decide what topics YOU'D like to discuss. Lex Dec 2012 #48
Whatever - but he was 100% correct to speak out about guns and violence n/t malaise Dec 2012 #49
Just For The Record, Ladies and Gentlemen, Check Out the Tons O' Fun Transparency Page The Magistrate Dec 2012 #50
Crushing poverty didn't kill the NFL player and his girlfriend BainsBane Dec 2012 #51
I thought this was sarcasm when I saw the title. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2012 #57
Looks like he got to you Politicub Dec 2012 #62
Football Rules - 32,000 Dead American's MEH! otohara Dec 2012 #65
Wow. hifiguy Dec 2012 #70
Last night Lawrence O'Donnell said something along the line of... Little Star Dec 2012 #71
I love how gungeoneers FAIL here when they get brave enough to wander out of the gungeon. Electric Monk Dec 2012 #75
do not reinstate.... mike_c Dec 2012 #76
I APPLAUD HIM FOR HIS STATEMENT!! watercolors Dec 2012 #77
"His own political ends?" Is he running for office or something? Chorophyll Dec 2012 #78
As an obvious football fan 4_TN_TITANS Dec 2012 #80
UnRec for you and your comment. GoneOffShore Dec 2012 #81
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Dec 2012 #83
Awesome thread.... Kalidurga Dec 2012 #85
Thanks, somebody had to do it. : ). nt rDigital Dec 2012 #103
LOLOL Skittles Dec 2012 #87
whatever...............nt Demonaut Dec 2012 #89
So the culture around a game is more violent DevonRex Dec 2012 #90
Wow.. it sounds like the horror of his opinion SomethingFishy Dec 2012 #91
How about we all just order sushi and call it a night ? : ) nt rDigital Dec 2012 #174
bullshit. it was a football player who committed the murder/suicide....i wasn't insulted one bit. spanone Dec 2012 #92
Not really. He went whole hog on handguns while simultaneously ignoring rDigital Dec 2012 #153
Here is a name he overlooked. Chris Benoit. Great Caesars Ghost Dec 2012 #93
The Pro Athlete who killed his whole family with his bare hands. : ( rDigital Dec 2012 #95
exactly, it would be no different if Joven didn't have a gun. Great Caesars Ghost Dec 2012 #110
If your definition Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2012 #96
Obviously, Bob Costas isn't on the same level of such world renowned intellectuals Moses2SandyKoufax Dec 2012 #104
+1. Hoyt Dec 2012 #114
Exactly! And it also helps if they're psychotic jerks. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2012 #115
There is no such thing as a respected journalist...they are entertainers, just like the team members ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #119
An OJ reference? Moses2SandyKoufax Dec 2012 #121
I had not seen a OJ reference previously, but am not paying the story much mind ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #123
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #98
You aren't likely to find anyone more favorable to the right to keep and bear arms than me TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #99
I think what he did was fine. I think the complaining about (gasp!) social discussion in a football fishwax Dec 2012 #101
Why does he have less of a right to speak than, say, Limbaugh? alarimer Dec 2012 #106
He's allowed to have an opinion. Now he's paying for it. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #113
Gun nuts need guns. sarcasmo Dec 2012 #111
I must have missed the part where Costas was required to check with you Downtown Hound Dec 2012 #118
You definitely missed it. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #126
Fuck Costas Berserker Dec 2012 #120
As opposed to the stunning intellect you've just demonstrated here. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #122
To Bob the Blowhard... -..__... Dec 2012 #124
well you can wish in one hand and shit in the other.. frylock Dec 2012 #155
You got lucky. A jury voted 3-3. Electric Monk Dec 2012 #184
Yes. Let's Dixie Chick Bob Costas for speaking his mind on an important topic. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #189
uh oh.. costas doesnt like the precioussssssss, no he doesn't... dionysus Dec 2012 #207
Guns! bongbong Dec 2012 #133
It's been a while, BB. Good to hear from you. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #140
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #136
He's a public figure. There's no need to get personal. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #144
This is news? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #141
It's always something. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #145
The NFL doesn't give a shit SHRED Dec 2012 #150
They do only to the point it impacts the brand and the gate ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #157
don't forget rape. crazyjoe Dec 2012 #151
Football players CHOOSE their violence. Guns are such that your personal choices can have little patrice Dec 2012 #152
I can definitely understand this sentiment. Solid post. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #163
Project Much ?? WillyT Dec 2012 #154
No, not really. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #160
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #156
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #158
This message was self-deleted by its author rDigital Dec 2012 #159
You defended your position in that thread. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #164
This message was self-deleted by its author rDigital Dec 2012 #165
Nope. He's right. Arugula Latte Dec 2012 #161
Thank you for participating in the conversation. : ) nt rDigital Dec 2012 #162
The tipping point on guns might finally be at hand MightyMopar Dec 2012 #166
In which direction? In the last 30 years concealed carry went from an obscurity in a couple states rDigital Dec 2012 #167
I disagree with almost everything Costas said tularetom Dec 2012 #168
I'm not saying that it should be illegal for him to say anything, just that it was ill advised and rDigital Dec 2012 #170
Yes... BY All Means, Let's Not Let Reality Iggy Dec 2012 #185
He should have mentioned all of that. But now to the industry he makes his living yakking about, freshwest Dec 2012 #182
Agreed. Another breath of fresh air from the freshness factory. Always a pleasure, FW. : ) nt rDigital Dec 2012 #183
So glad to have seen your post. Thank you. n/t Judi Lynn Dec 2012 #186
What media inducing fear? nt Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #193
Oh, here's one of them: freshwest Dec 2012 #194
Can't disagree with those 4 things... MrMickeysMom Dec 2012 #187
A most standard response LanternWaste Dec 2012 #190
The gun lobby has been hijacking America for its own political ends for too long. DainBramaged Dec 2012 #191
cheap shot? ha, right. Raffi Ella Dec 2012 #192
Discuss all you like, the issue has already been decided. Pacafishmate Dec 2012 #197
Do you still believe that gun control supporters are holocaust enablers? apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #195
. Rex Dec 2012 #199
"holocaust enablers" Kolesar Dec 2012 #205
Yep - and that isn't even the HALF of it. n/t. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #216
... apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #196
... apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #198
Last I checked, this country still has freedom of speech liberal N proud Dec 2012 #201
Agreed, and I am simply doing the same as he. He's a public figure, harsh criticism is expected. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #203
You're not a public figure. You're a gungeoneer with a significant number of hidden posts Kolesar Dec 2012 #206
Thread disruption is not appreciated. If you have a problem. rDigital Dec 2012 #208
Go outside and play basketball or something Kolesar Dec 2012 #209
Sure. rDigital Dec 2012 #210
+1,000. n/t. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #215
What you are doing is hanging a tag on him because you don't like what he said liberal N proud Dec 2012 #211
Exactly. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2012 #213
I can appreciate your perspective. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #214
It's been 12 days and I still think this post is moronic. n/t ellisonz Dec 2012 #219
 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
1. Calling the Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahmbulance for you!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:41 PM
Dec 2012

Yupy

(154 posts)
39. He should talk about people like you and how to AVOID your NON-SENSE COMMENTS
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:21 PM
Dec 2012

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,760 posts)
112. +1 :) n/t
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:58 PM
Dec 2012

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
148. yeah. fuck that guy for giving five minutes to discuss an epidemic when
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:37 PM
Dec 2012

the football game was on.

 
117. Or just call the family of Nancy Benoit
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:29 PM
Dec 2012

Armed or not, it wouldn't have made a difference.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
2. Classic example of jock culture
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:41 PM
Dec 2012

Arguably more damaging than the so called gun culture.

11 Bravo

(24,307 posts)
56. I am very much a product of the "jock culture", and I'm also a proud progressive.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:00 PM
Dec 2012

We return you now to your regularly scheduled stereotypical broad-brush attack.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,443 posts)
68. Me too.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:17 PM
Dec 2012

It's sad that there are those on DU that find the two incompatible.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
86. Same here played football ans graduated second in my high school class
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:03 PM
Dec 2012

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
105. Sorry the sarcasm was lost on some
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:36 PM
Dec 2012

There are any number of people blaming the gun culture for all sorts of things. Then someone posted black vs white gun crime stats yesterday and the argument went racial. Just thought I would push back some

There are issues with the jock culture in both high school and college at places. Think Columbine. Professional athletes have been getting away with murder (literally) for some time. Its misogynist and exploitative.

I too was a student athlete, but thanks to very down to earth mother and well trained father, never took it to seriously. When I had to make a choice in college, I left athletics in favor of academics.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
149. actually, he was addressing the murder death of two people by guns
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:38 PM
Dec 2012

given that there is exactly about ten minutes a year given over to discussing the violence of guns in America which is the leading cause of death in some demographics, I applaud his guts. Now go back to the game.

radicalliberal

(907 posts)
218. I wonder if nonathletic boys who have no interest in sports are ever subjected ...
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 04:54 PM
Dec 2012

... to marginalization or broad-brush attacks. No, that couldn't be true.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
3. oh, so he doesn't quote you, so you consider him stupid
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:44 PM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
127. Yes. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:13 PM
Dec 2012

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
175. I quoted him and I'll be he's not happy with me either:
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:44 AM
Dec 2012
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
4. Oy...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:45 PM
Dec 2012

911 what is our emergency?

We need a wwaaambulance.

rocktivity

(45,006 posts)
16. Wrong number
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:06 PM
Dec 2012

You're supposed to call WHINE-one-one!


rocktivity

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
100. Comments like these are far more effective with an accompanying illustration.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:08 PM
Dec 2012

[IMG][/IMG]

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
5. You may be 100% correct about Costas, but, Sometimes, it takes a moron to move things Forward
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:47 PM
Dec 2012

Politics is life. Life is Politics
Football is life. Life is a football game (or is it baseball)

and football is our national pasttime

I think the repubs took Janet's wardobe malfunction and used that singular event to get rid of Dan Rather later on.

Plus ESPN hired Rush Limbaugh (though quickly fired him when he couldn't control his racism).

Plus Hank Jr. one of the most rightwing of rightwingers, sang the theme for decades and getting good face time on tv and keeping his name in view, and his views front and center

I have been to many concerts in my life

and mostly the crowd is with the singer, being that they paid good money to see them

but a few years ago, seeing Springsteen, all of a sudden a new kind of thing happened

Some(not many) yelled out- we paid our money to hear you sing, so sing and don't politic here
when he sang his "41 shots" song.


As Billy Joel sang "We didn't start the fire"
but it takes a spark to make a fire
and as Archduke Ferdinand found out sometimes sparks come in the most unobvious of places.

or as George Carlin posit'd "Football vs. Baseball"
In a war, anything goes. And football is war

(IMHO)
 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
6. There is always another topic to address in this godforsaken nation. But Costas said what he felt.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:50 PM
Dec 2012

That he didn't please YOU is kind of neither here nor there.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
102. We all have our opinions. That's why we're here : ). nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:10 PM
Dec 2012
 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
7. If you don't love the gun, that makes you a moron??? nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:51 PM
Dec 2012

Response to kelliekat44 (Reply #7)

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
107. Yeah, that's exactly what he said....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:45 PM
Dec 2012

sure....

Spazito

(55,431 posts)
8. LOL!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:53 PM
Dec 2012

Bob Costas doesn't reflect your view of the world of guns ergo he is a "moron". Wrong.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
9. Unrec...he advocated for a very good cause...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:54 PM
Dec 2012

Unrec to high heaven your stupid OP.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
53. +1
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:56 PM
Dec 2012
 

Lightbulb_on

(315 posts)
94. Would you be as excited if he had advocated for what others believe...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:58 PM
Dec 2012

... to be a "very good cause" but you find abhorrent?

Perhaps an anti gay marriage speech in the prop 8 days?

or a pro-Romney speech a few months ago?

Some folks think that those are really important and valid. It doesn't mean that football is the place for it.

jorno67

(1,986 posts)
10. Fail!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:56 PM
Dec 2012

Costas spoke from the heart in front of everyone knowing damn well that he'd take some lumps from knee jerking, mouth breathing, shallow thinking, gun toting Umercans. Hell he put his job on the line to do so! That makes him a hero! I'm sure he is truly sorry he didn't mention you or your pet project during his limited allotted time.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
11. He's a moron because he doesn't share your fetish?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:57 PM
Dec 2012

That's nice.


bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
22. There are many purist on DU that can't see a larger picture. Domestic violence is
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:11 PM
Dec 2012

a problem that must be solved, but guns are often used in that violence. Gun control is part of many solutions. Costas was exactly right.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
24. Hear, hear!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:18 PM
Dec 2012

Wish the OP was able to grasp the connection.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
12. He was doing a story on a sports related tragedy. Railing against war on drugs seems more political.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:57 PM
Dec 2012

Or anything else you listed would seem more political than a story about a NFL tragedy.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
131. You're right, Mental illness and the NFL's cult of violence would have made better topics. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:19 PM
Dec 2012

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
169. Because violence and guns are entirely unrelated.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:33 AM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
173. I see what you are saying.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:38 AM
Dec 2012

Last edited Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:22 AM - Edit history (1)

Note that Russia has literally zero civilian handguns and their murder rate is in excess of 3x our murder rate. People will use what is available, but it's not the objects, it's the people doing the killing. A whole lot of them.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
178. But guns are far more efficient
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:57 AM
Dec 2012

At killing than other methods. They make it easier, which is both their purpose and their problem. Sure the football player might have used a knife, but it's far less likely, particularly for suicide. There is far greater access to murder because of guns.

I'm not advocating to take your guns away. The court has ruled on the issue. But I don't have to like how common guns are in American society.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
179. I can appreciate your perspective and I respect it. Here's more of mine.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:24 AM
Dec 2012

Japan's suicide rate absolutely trounces our total murder & suicide rate combined at 23.8 per 100k(Our suicide rate is 12 and our murder rate is 5.22). South Korea is even higher at 31.2.

They have no legal civilian handguns and almost no other civilian legal guns of any kind.

I think the media makes the problem seem bigger than it is. I think readily accessible mental healthcare is a more productive solution than whack-a-mole with our rights.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
180. I am all for access to mental health care
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:29 AM
Dec 2012

Sounds like a good start to me.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
181. A few of my high school friends might still be with us if they had received the proper care. : (
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:38 AM
Dec 2012

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
13. I don't think that what he did was moronic.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:57 PM
Dec 2012

I think it was courageous. Saying that he could have addressed some of the other issues you mentioned misses the point. A football player did not die from poverty, inequality or the war on drugs. Possibly mental illness.

I may or may not agree with what he did, but I wouldn't call it moronic. Probably career suicide, though.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
128. May he go the way of Hank Williams Jr. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:14 PM
Dec 2012

srican69

(1,426 posts)
14. Oh my - Gun toting tough guy is complaining about hurt feelings...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:02 PM
Dec 2012

If need a licence ( that needs periodic renewal) for a car - then I should damn well have the same requirements for operating a firearm. There are too many idiots with guns in this country and that is a FACT.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
108. You don't need a licence to buy a car, or to operate it on private property.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:47 PM
Dec 2012

Just when you take it out on public roads.

I also don't see much about vehicles in the Constitution....

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
116. Other things not in the Constitution:
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:21 PM
Dec 2012

The Air Force
Congressional Districts
The Electoral College
Executive Order
Executive Privilege
Freedom of Expression
(Absolute) Freedom of Speech and Press
"From each according to his ability..."
God
Immigration
Impeachment means removal from office
Innocent until proven guilty
It's a free country
Judicial Review
Jury of Peers
"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"
Marriage
Martial Law
No taxation without representation
Number of Justices in the Supreme Court
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
129. You're so pleasant. I wish that DU had more posters of your caliber. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:16 PM
Dec 2012

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
15. It was hardly a "cheap shot."
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:05 PM
Dec 2012

It was a message that needed to be communicated.

The fact you didn't want to hear it? Well that's your own damn fault.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
17. Attention...um....world. Got a message?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:07 PM
Dec 2012

Make sure it is thoroughly vetted by Democratic Underground user rDigital to ensure it conforms with his/her belief and value system.

That is all.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
97. We all have opinions. :) I'm no authority, it's all good. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:02 PM
Dec 2012

FSogol

(47,609 posts)
18. Unrec. With everything going on in the world, you get upset over a sports yakker
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:08 PM
Dec 2012

insulting guns?

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
132. Unrec. Your not caring doesn't make my point irrelevant. Also, note the recs. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:21 PM
Dec 2012

mfcorey1

(11,134 posts)
19. I respectfully disagree. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:08 PM
Dec 2012

rtassi

(629 posts)
20. more then appropriate
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:09 PM
Dec 2012

for Bob to use half time to editorialize ... it was after all related to persons involved in the very sport being broad casted .. to say nothing of the suicide taking place on the property and in front of his organization. It will never be determined to anyones satisfaction if the killings would have taken place had a gun not been present or readily accessible ... but that it was, is evidence enough of the inherent dangers of emotionally unstable persons having access to guns ... professional athletes or not ...
I applaud Bob for the courage it took, knowing that the reactionary and fearful would blow a gasket and view football as exempt from societal commentary ...

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
21. I'd be pissed too if a sportscaster had more common sense than I did. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:10 PM
Dec 2012

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
54. LOL
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:58 PM
Dec 2012

Seriously though, I think some sportscasters are brighter than their counterparts in the news division.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
139. Why would anyone be mad about that? nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:33 PM
Dec 2012
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
23. Costas is just over-the-head of gun culture. Kind of like those who saw climate change, bigotry,
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:16 PM
Dec 2012

the earth is not flat, etc., before others.

I applaud him for making something of his "position" other than just sports.
 

regjoe

(206 posts)
25. Yes, he is a moron for preaching his fears and politics during a sporting event
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

on national television.

If he felt he had to open his trap, he should have blabbed about what this event was truly about: violence against women.

It's funny: costas whines about a Constitutional right and whines about government not taking it away, but posters say you are the one who needs the waaaaaaaaambulance. LOL!

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
32. Unrec for stupid NRA talking points...nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:33 PM
Dec 2012
 

regjoe

(206 posts)
40. Ah, the notorious "UNREC"
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:30 PM
Dec 2012

Used often by those unable to dispute facts.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
47. Facts?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:47 PM
Dec 2012

You mean the epidemic problem with gun violence in this country?

Those kind of facts?

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
52. As Michael Moore pointed out...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:55 PM
Dec 2012

Canadians have nearly as many guns as those in the US do.

So why does Canada have so many fewer deaths?

I'm sick and tired of this "If we have gun control, everything will be all hunky-dory!"

Criminals who BY LAW aren't supposed to have guns, are arrested with them.

Guns do not cause violence.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
55. Canada also has much stricter gun control laws than the U.S.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:59 PM
Dec 2012

So that would make perfect logical sense.

But nice try.

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
59. If Canada does, why are there as many as there are in the US?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:03 PM
Dec 2012

And what exactly are those laws?
And which of those laws have counterparts in the US, like felons being forbidden from having guns?

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
61. Just a brief sample:
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Canada

Individuals who wish to possess or acquire firearms in Canada must have a valid possession-acquisition, or possession-only, licence (PAL/POL); either of these licences allows the licensee to purchase ammunition. The PAL is distributed exclusively by the RCMP and is generally obtained in the following three steps:
1.Safety training: To be eligible to receive a PAL, all applicants must successfully complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course[15] (CFSC) for a non-restricted licence, and the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course[16] (CRFSC) for a restricted licence; the non-restricted class is a prerequisite to the restricted licence. The RCMP publishes information on the locations and availability of these courses.[17]
2.Applying for a licence: Currently only one type of licence is available to new applicants, the possession-acquisition licence (PAL). People can request a PAL by filling out Form CAFC 921.[18]
3.Security screening: Background checks and investigations are performed. All applicants are screened, and a mandatory 28-day waiting period is imposed on first-time applicants, but response time may be longer.[19]

Licences are typically valid for five years and must be renewed prior to expiry to maintain all classes. Once licensed, an individual can apply for a firearm transfer;[20] and an authorization to transport[21] (ATT) for restricted firearms.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

The NRA would crap its pants if we ever suggested doing something similar over here.
 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
66. The NRA no longer has the power it once did.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:15 PM
Dec 2012

This was shown quite emphatically in how much the NRA spent on this election, and how badly they did.

Those laws look like they make sense, and should be put into place here in the US.

And fuck the NRA and their hysterics.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
69. Good, then we agree on something.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:17 PM
Dec 2012

So if not the NRA, what's stopping states from enacting measures similar to those in Canada?

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
72. What's stopping them?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:20 PM
Dec 2012

Hysterics from gun nut groups like the NRA.

And believe it or not, the NRA is not the worst.

Just look up "Gun Owners of America" and their leader, Larry Pratt.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
73. I'm not getting you.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:23 PM
Dec 2012

On the one hand, the NRA doesn't have the power that it used to.

But on the other hand, common sense gun control measures are being blocked because of opposotion of the NRA and other gun advocacy groups.

Can you elaborate? I'm not being sarcastic; I'm just curious as to your angle here.

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
74. Mostly they are blocked due to bought-and-paid-for politicians.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:29 PM
Dec 2012

There's also a great deal of hysterical propaganda being spread by the gun nut groups, just look how a UN bill to stop the trafficking across borders of guns has in the eyes of Wayne LaPierre, morph into a "UN plot to grab our guns."

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
109. So they do have power. Got it. n/t
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:49 PM
Dec 2012

frylock

(34,825 posts)
64. probably wouldn't hurt to do some basic research before arguing against something
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:13 PM
Dec 2012

Spazito

(55,431 posts)
60. We have sensible gun control...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:07 PM
Dec 2012

NO conceal/carry; severe restriction on handguns; etc, etc, etc. You actually make a good point FOR sensible gun control by pointing out the vast differences in the number of deaths per capita between Canada and the United States even though your intent was the opposite.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
79. Because Canada didn't come from the wild wild west idolize the gun culture
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

the stereotyped Cowboys beating the indians with their gun vs. the bow and arrow

I don't remember Dudley Doright having a gun though

People in Canada had Canadian Mounties, but not the image of the gunslinger

as Johnny Cash sang"I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die&quot c)

Guns kill directly.

and its legal guns that make illegal guns impossible to get rid of

most of the major events were from legal guns, betcha this one was too

The tea party showed what it showed.
Can anyone imagine if the Rev. Farrakhan's million man march had 1 million people stroking their guns like the tea party did outside town halls (and then Gabbie Giffords was almost killed and a judge was)

It is the glorification in America of the gun

the entire issue needs to be reframed

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
172. Men cause violence
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:38 AM
Dec 2012

Are you suggesting we get rid of them?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
63. what you posted was opinion..
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:12 PM
Dec 2012

there was nothing factual in anything you posted.

 

regjoe

(206 posts)
88. Nothing?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:33 PM
Dec 2012

Fact: Costas preached his fears and politics during a sporting event on national television.
Fact: Control over a woman was the cause of this tragic event and violence against a woman was the result.
Fact: The 2nd Amendment is a Constitutional right.
Fact: Pro 2nd Amendment supporters fear losing their right. Anti rights people fear inanimate objects.

Debatable opinion: Costas is a moron.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
147. opinion; opinion; fact; opinion
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:25 PM
Dec 2012

i give you another week here, tops.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
177. So why are you so fucking afraid
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:47 AM
Dec 2012

Of hearing anything that states the obvious: guns kill. No one is taking away your guns. You people are messianic. It's not enough that you have personal arsenals and that thousands of people die every year so you can play with your guns. But you feel you shouldn't have to be subject to hearing the views of others. You won. The court places your right to bear arms above my right to safety. We don't like it but there is nothing we can do about it. So you hear some bitching once in a while. Deal with it. WTF are you complaining about anyway? What more do you want? Mind control?

 

regjoe

(206 posts)
200. Hmmmm?
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:28 PM
Dec 2012

Not sure where you get that I am afraid, but I am not.

Anti rights people can preach all they want, but they should use facts, not their personal opinions. Halftime of a football game is not the time or place to preach your fears.
Yes, the court has maintained that our 2nd Amendment right, which has been around since our founding btw, is above your fear.

I deal with your fear on a daily basis and, to be quite honest, I find it amusing. But that in no way means that I aim to prevent you from your whining. I know the 2nd Amendment isn't going anywhere.

What am I complaining about? Costas preaching anti 2nd Amendment rhetoric on national television during football and trying to pass it off as fact. If he want to preach his political opinions he should do it on political shows.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
217. Why is it anti rights
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 07:36 PM
Dec 2012

To make the obvious statement that guns kill people? There is never the right place as far as you folks are concerned. Why not be honest? You don't believe anyone should be able to say anything about your sacred guns ever.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
188. "Inanimate" objects that have the capability of becoming quite animate.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:52 AM
Dec 2012

As in having the capability to shoot a sharp projectile at the speed of sound which has the ability to cut through human flesh. That's pretty damn animate to me.

And that's not just an unintended consequence of the purpose of this so-called "inanimate object." That's its intended purpose.

We aren't talking about a stepping stool, or a toaster over, or a--I'll say it--car. (Because I know how much all you gun enthusiasts love to draw comparisons between car deaths and gun deaths as if they were any way remotely similar.) We're talking about an instrument which is designed exclusively for killing, injuring, or the simulation of killing/injuring.

You talk about fear of guns, and maybe that's you gun enthusiasts' problem. You don't think we should be afraid of them. Not even a healthy, logical, rational fear. Anything that has the ability to take a human life should be viewed with a bit of caution. And anything that was designed with the specific purpose of having the ability to take a human life should be viewed as extreme, as out of the ordinary, as something not to be trifled with except in only the most exceptional of circumstances. Collecting guns as if they were baseball cards, carrying them around as if they were your wallet in your pocket, chalking it off as simply your "right" without regard to potential consequences or problems down the road--it is an unhealthy obsession, a delusion.

So forgive me if I have just a little fear of your precious "inanimate object."

MountainMama

(237 posts)
202. Bravo!!
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:53 PM
Dec 2012

+infinity

 

regjoe

(206 posts)
204. "Gun enthusiast?" LOL!
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:21 PM
Dec 2012

Yes, it is an inanimate object. It cannot cause harm on its own, but it can be used to cause harm.
I'm not the type of person to trivialize your fears and desires with comparisons or what if scenarios. Guns are designed to be used to kill and are used to kill. But, as Americans, we have ALWAYS had the Constitutional right to have them. So the question is, do we strip that right from all in order to please the few? I say no. Especially seeing how the places with the strictest gun laws are also the ones with the most murders.

Seems to me that the people who are so paranoid about what MIGHT happen, but more than likely won't happen, are the ones with an "unhealthy obsession or delusion." Living in constant fear that SOMEBODY, SOMEWHERE, may be "collecting" guns or, heaven forbid, "carrying" one around.

Look, the fact is that the 2nd Amendment really is simply our right and its not going anywhere. With rights come consequences. Yes, there are some holes we can fill, but it's one of our most regulated and controlled "rights."
If it really does scare you that much, then by all means work to get rid of it. It will be a wasted effort, but at least it might make you fell better.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
212. The problem is, folks like you cry bloody murder on the "regulated and controlled" aspect.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:01 PM
Dec 2012

You say it's a regulated and controlled right, but if anyone attempts to regulate or control guns, you'll go on and on about infringement and gun grabbers and so on and so forth. The fact of the matter is very few here or anywhere are advocating for a total 100% ban on all firearms. But many of us want restrictions, whether that be in the types of weapons a private citizen can own, the steps one must go through to obtain one, the steps one must go through to keep one, for some perhaps the amount of guns a private citizen can own, where that gun can and cannot be carried. There's not necessarily a consensus, except amongst the most fervent gun enthusiasts, and that is that it is all bad, and we're all a bunch of pansy "nanny staters" yada yada yada.

And you talk about fear, but it seems to me the ones living their lives in fear the most are the gun enthusiasts. Everyone's a potential robber, every person is a potential mass murderer, and you and only you can be John Wayne and save the day with your trust old sidearm forever at your side. It's thinking like that where you see a 17 year old unarmed kid dead for no reason other than he was wearing a hoodie in an unfamiliar neighborhood. That's fearful thinking for you.

On the other hand, I choose not to have a gun in my house. I know I live in a safe neighborhood with very little history of violent crime and the likelihood of a violent home invasion in my home is slim to none and does not justify me bringing in an instrument specifically designed to cause death or injury into my house, which I share with my wife and two young children. And I know in that very slim chance of such an event, I do have a 34 inch solid aluminum Easton baseball bat under my bed that I'm quite comfortable in using. And it's cheap, doesn't require a license, and probably wouldn't attact the curiousity of any children using it for any reason other than a pickup game of stickball

And yes, I will call folks like you "gun enthusiasts." It's what one calls a euphemism. My preferred phraseology involves the combination of the word "gun" and a certain crunchy organic snack food found in bowls at bars and such, but I'd rather keep it civil here.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
41. Unrec for using the term 'talking points"
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
58. he didn't mention the constitution or gun control
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:00 PM
Dec 2012

He made the simple observation that as long as guns are ubiquitous, lots of people will die. Guns kill. That is what they are created to do, and they perform the task quite efficiently.

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
171. He didn't talk about any of that
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:36 AM
Dec 2012

Paranoid much?

BeyondGeography

(41,075 posts)
26. He's a smart guy
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:29 PM
Dec 2012

He might even be smarter than you.

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
67. So why did Costas do so badly during the London Olympics?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:17 PM
Dec 2012

I just wanted him to shut up.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
27. Unrec.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:31 PM
Dec 2012

Because I'm sick of the gungeon crawling into GD.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
28. Good thing you don't GET to decide what issue he cares about and when he talks about it.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:32 PM
Dec 2012

As for the accusation that he is a moron, I'm inclined to used the word "projection" and leave it at that.

Response to rDigital (Original post)

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
125. Samesies! nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:10 PM
Dec 2012

Response to rDigital (Reply #125)

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
143. No, just that I feel the same way as you do. Happy Tuesday. : ) nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:55 PM
Dec 2012

Response to rDigital (Reply #143)

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
30. Grow up ... he gave his personal opinion and I happen to agree with him ....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:32 PM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
130. I'm giving my personal opinion and I disagree with him.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:17 PM
Dec 2012
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
31. says the former gungeon member
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:33 PM
Dec 2012

So, missing the gungeon a little? You won't find as pleasant an atmosphere here for the gun types.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
33. he went after the precious, yes he did....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:34 PM
Dec 2012

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
34. Regardless;
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:36 PM
Dec 2012

He Spoke The Truth! Like it or not.

Viking12

(6,012 posts)
35. Don't you have a War on Christams to wage...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:39 PM
Dec 2012

or some other made up outrage?

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
36. Dennis Miller would never have done that, right, Cha-Chi?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:42 PM
Dec 2012

Response to Ian David (Reply #36)

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
134. Dennis Miller is another moron, but not the subject of this OP. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:24 PM
Dec 2012
 

Paladin

(32,354 posts)
37. Quit Whining. You've Still Got FoxNews On Your Side. (nt)
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:45 PM
Dec 2012

VOX

(22,976 posts)
38. But you're okay with the late Charlton Heston's public posturing for guns, guns, guns?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:46 PM
Dec 2012

Costas' choice to say what/when he did was appropriate to the immediate tragedy and the corrosive gun culture that cheapens life in this country.

The only people who would flip out at Costsa' common-sense remarks would be an NRA nut.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
135. You present a poor argument and a false dichotomy to boot. nt.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:25 PM
Dec 2012

Dirty Socialist

(3,252 posts)
42. Post And Run
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

He's gone now.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
137. Back now, did you want something? nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:26 PM
Dec 2012

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
43. I want to hear more about the suicide states for former NFL players
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:33 PM
Dec 2012

It must be huge

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
138. I guess it's not a big deal for you, but the suicide rate for men
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:31 PM
Dec 2012

who have played in the NFL is 6x the national average.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/opinion/bruni-pro-footballs-violent-toll.html?_r=0

sarisataka

(22,650 posts)
44. I don't know if I would say moron
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:41 PM
Dec 2012

and I am sure he spoke his opinion with the full knowledge and approval of the network. I believe he had a greater failing in reading someone else's words rather than his own. That I would have respected more.

And I agree there is a massive disconnect in the NFL. They push players to deliver the most exciting (violent) product they can deliver while claiming to be concerned for their health. I believe that concern ends when the player's career ends. They disavow any long term problems or when the violence spills from the field into a player's personal life.

The players are further enabled by the NFL, their teams and the legal system for the slap-on-the-wrist treatment we see a dozen or more times each year when they get in trouble with drink, drugs or 'altercations'.

I would have had far more respect for Costas if he advocated against domestic violence or the culture of violence in America.

Agree completely, even to add that guns are not solutions to everyday problems and must be handled with the utmost care would have been ok. To say that neither would be dead if not for a gun and the implication that the gun made him do it is merely excusing the violent action and avoiding the tough question of 'why'
 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
45. First rule of Gun Club
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:43 PM
Dec 2012

Don't talk about Gun Club. Thanks for the reminder, Gun Guy, I almost forgot.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
48. Great, get yourself a show and then you can decide what topics YOU'D like to discuss.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:48 PM
Dec 2012

malaise

(295,770 posts)
49. Whatever - but he was 100% correct to speak out about guns and violence n/t
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:53 PM
Dec 2012

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
50. Just For The Record, Ladies and Gentlemen, Check Out the Tons O' Fun Transparency Page
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:53 PM
Dec 2012

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
51. Crushing poverty didn't kill the NFL player and his girlfriend
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 04:54 PM
Dec 2012

a gun did. Costas' point was entirely appropriate. What is astounding is how rare such observations have become in this country. The rest of the world, rightfully, believes the US is insane in its profligate distribution of weapons. Naturally thousands of people die over meaningless arguments--like loud music--when people have guns. It's an obviously point. What is moronic is that you pretend otherwise.

Americans have little choice in these matters. SCOTUS has ruled the Second Amendment means your right to arms is more important than my right to safety. But that doesn't mean I have to be happy about it.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,443 posts)
57. I thought this was sarcasm when I saw the title.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:00 PM
Dec 2012

Looks like no one agrees with you.

Politicub

(12,327 posts)
62. Looks like he got to you
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:11 PM
Dec 2012

Good. Means his message is cutting through the clutter.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
65. Football Rules - 32,000 Dead American's MEH!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:14 PM
Dec 2012

expendable people, expendable jobs, expendable children, nobody gives a shit so shut your mouth, USA USA USA!

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
70. Wow.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:19 PM
Dec 2012

That is just sad. And so are you.

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
71. Last night Lawrence O'Donnell said something along the line of...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:19 PM
Dec 2012

How many home runs could Babe Ruth have hit without a bat?

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
75. I love how gungeoneers FAIL here when they get brave enough to wander out of the gungeon.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:33 PM
Dec 2012

You're not the first, and I'm sure you won't be the last.

Welcome to the rest of DU

mike_c

(37,045 posts)
76. do not reinstate....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:39 PM
Dec 2012

For obvious reasons.

watercolors

(1,921 posts)
77. I APPLAUD HIM FOR HIS STATEMENT!!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:39 PM
Dec 2012

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
78. "His own political ends?" Is he running for office or something?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:41 PM
Dec 2012

I guess you don't agree with him, but he's not a moron.

4_TN_TITANS

(2,977 posts)
80. As an obvious football fan
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:45 PM
Dec 2012

the irony of him talking about gun violence while taking a break from football violence was completely lost on me. Costas is not a moron, but point well taken.

GoneOffShore

(18,018 posts)
81. UnRec for you and your comment.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:47 PM
Dec 2012

Response to rDigital (Original post)

Response to rDigital (Original post)

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
85. Awesome thread....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:57 PM
Dec 2012

After the last couple of days watching people sniping on each other it's good to see an OP bring DU back together again.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
103. Thanks, somebody had to do it. : ). nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:14 PM
Dec 2012

Skittles

(171,564 posts)
87. LOLOL
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:18 PM
Dec 2012

you poor, POOR baby

Demonaut

(10,068 posts)
89. whatever...............nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:35 PM
Dec 2012

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
90. So the culture around a game is more violent
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:44 PM
Dec 2012

than the culture around machines designed specifically to kill.

Got it.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
91. Wow.. it sounds like the horror of his opinion
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:45 PM
Dec 2012

has scarred your fragile little mind.

He should commit hari-kari right now!

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
174. How about we all just order sushi and call it a night ? : ) nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:40 AM
Dec 2012

spanone

(141,523 posts)
92. bullshit. it was a football player who committed the murder/suicide....i wasn't insulted one bit.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:46 PM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
153. Not really. He went whole hog on handguns while simultaneously ignoring
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:48 PM
Dec 2012

the darkside of The NFL. It's a Pot-meet-Kettle kinda thing.

 
93. Here is a name he overlooked. Chris Benoit.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 06:53 PM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
95. The Pro Athlete who killed his whole family with his bare hands. : (
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:01 PM
Dec 2012
 
110. exactly, it would be no different if Joven didn't have a gun.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
96. If your definition
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:01 PM
Dec 2012

of moron is "intelligent, articulate, interesting, compassionate, and well-informed" then yeah--what a fucking moron.

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
104. Obviously, Bob Costas isn't on the same level of such world renowned intellectuals
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:29 PM
Dec 2012

like Ted Nugent, John Lott, Mary Rosh, Masaad Ayoob, Larry Pratt, Glenn Beck ect...

He's only a respected journalist and the face of an entire network's sports division (what a loser!). Apparently, anyone who wants to be taken seriously in the gun nut community needs to deal in blatant falsehoods, false-equivalencies, and right-wing conspiracy theories.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
114. +1.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:11 PM
Dec 2012

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
115. Exactly! And it also helps if they're psychotic jerks.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:17 PM
Dec 2012

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
119. There is no such thing as a respected journalist...they are entertainers, just like the team members
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:58 PM
Dec 2012

The NFL hates controversy and this is controversy...

Costas has already backpedaled somewhat: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021927990

If he was truly concerned about domestic violence in sports, he could have started with his ex broadcast partner

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
121. An OJ reference?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:10 PM
Dec 2012

I've noticed citing an 18 year old incident is the go-to argument for gun nuts who don't want to discuss the issue at hand.

Best part of all this is seeing idiot gun worshipers become further unhinged over the fact that they can't get NBC to discipline or fire one of the most respected men in his profession. Another welcome example of how the worst segments of society are losing control and influence.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
123. I had not seen a OJ reference previously, but am not paying the story much mind
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:55 PM
Dec 2012

I hate how badly LAPD screwed up the case. They took what should have been a binary case and mucked it up so badly that it will never be settled.

One of the joys of being a large black male is that you have to live with the public perception of large black men. Bad deeds by black athletes have direct personal consequences for me.

I have zero respect for "journalists" Its a non profession, never has been. They are entertainers, often with agendas of all stripes.

I have little tolerance for professional entertainers, including athletes. I accord them no deference or respect I don't give the person next door. Drives some in their entourages nuts. Been a couple incidents over the years.

The key organization will be the NFL who hates controversy. If this dies away, I doubt anything will happen. The game yesterday was one of the first I have seen in quite some time, the show has come a long way

Response to rDigital (Original post)

 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
99. You aren't likely to find anyone more favorable to the right to keep and bear arms than me
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:08 PM
Dec 2012

and I don't mean on DU, I'm fairly comfortable saying I might leave the NRA behind on that one but that doesn't mean I think Costas is even in moronic's vicinity. Smart people of good faith can disagree though I agree that the triage of problems is off base.

Costas went on a limb for this but is silent on much more pervasive and pressing issues and I am left wondering why this is so important when it is statistically small bore.

Moron? Not at all.

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
101. I think what he did was fine. I think the complaining about (gasp!) social discussion in a football
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:09 PM
Dec 2012

broadcast is kind of silly. It isn't as though he was creating the issue out of thin air. It was the topic of the day in the NFL on Sunday.

On edit: And I would think that even if his commentary had gone the other direction, pointing out that the day before Belcher tragedy there was another murder suicide, in which a man--in this case, without a handgun--committed two murders and then killed himself on a community college campus in Wyoming.

 

alarimer

(17,146 posts)
106. Why does he have less of a right to speak than, say, Limbaugh?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:39 PM
Dec 2012

He was quoting someone else, anyway, and I largely agreed with what he said.

How many fucking deaths is it going to take? How many people have to die before we wise up?

This is a two-fold problem: domestic violence and guns. Too much of both.

The fact is that women who are murdered are murdered by their partners.The constant availability of guns does not help the situation.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
113. He's allowed to have an opinion. Now he's paying for it. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:11 PM
Dec 2012

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)
111. Gun nuts need guns.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:56 PM
Dec 2012

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
118. I must have missed the part where Costas was required to check with you
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:30 PM
Dec 2012

about what he should talk about.

Oh and, fuck your respect. I don't need it and sure doubt Costas does either.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
126. You definitely missed it. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:12 PM
Dec 2012
 

Berserker

(3,419 posts)
120. Fuck Costas
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:00 PM
Dec 2012

And welcome to the real DU where people think and not act like assholes in lockstep.
Thanks again rDigital for posting this. Most of the posts sound like 3rd graders and about the same mentality. Sorry if I offended any third graders in here posting.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
122. As opposed to the stunning intellect you've just demonstrated here.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:44 PM
Dec 2012

Bravo. Bravo indeed.

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
124. To Bob the Blowhard...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:55 PM
Dec 2012

my deepest wish that this destroys your career in TV, sports, journalism forever.

Granted... it probably wont (we can only hope), but just the same, you still need a fastball to the face.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
155. well you can wish in one hand and shit in the other..
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:53 PM
Dec 2012

costas isn't going anywhere just because a few meatheads are butthurt over an editorial.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
184. You got lucky. A jury voted 3-3.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:38 AM
Dec 2012
just the same, you still need a fastball to the face.


TOS violation for advocating violence. I hope admins take note. You're long overdue for a pizza.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
189. Yes. Let's Dixie Chick Bob Costas for speaking his mind on an important topic.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:58 AM
Dec 2012

And wish him physical harm to boot.

You disgust me.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
207. uh oh.. costas doesnt like the precioussssssss, no he doesn't...
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:32 PM
Dec 2012
 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
133. Guns!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:21 PM
Dec 2012

The Delicate Flowers (gun-nuts) need their guns. They're too scared to walk out the door without one.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
140. It's been a while, BB. Good to hear from you. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:34 PM
Dec 2012

Response to rDigital (Original post)

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
144. He's a public figure. There's no need to get personal. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:01 PM
Dec 2012
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
141. This is news?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:41 PM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
145. It's always something. nt
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:02 PM
Dec 2012
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
150. The NFL doesn't give a shit
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:39 PM
Dec 2012

Neither do the Chiefs.


Because they still played the game.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
157. They do only to the point it impacts the brand and the gate
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:38 AM
Dec 2012

Then and only then will they give a damn

 

crazyjoe

(1,191 posts)
151. don't forget rape.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:41 PM
Dec 2012

patrice

(47,992 posts)
152. Football players CHOOSE their violence. Guns are such that your personal choices can have little
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:44 PM
Dec 2012

to do with whether your suffer from the use of guns.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
163. I can definitely understand this sentiment. Solid post. nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:58 AM
Dec 2012
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
154. Project Much ??
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:48 PM
Dec 2012

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
160. No, not really. nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:55 AM
Dec 2012

Response to rDigital (Original post)

Response to rDigital (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #158)

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
164. You defended your position in that thread.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:58 AM
Dec 2012

And you restated it another thread.

1. http://www.democraticunderground.com/117284156#top

2. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=162303

And you did not answer the question.

Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #164)

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
161. Nope. He's right.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:55 AM
Dec 2012

Truth hurts.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
162. Thank you for participating in the conversation. : ) nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:56 AM
Dec 2012
 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
166. The tipping point on guns might finally be at hand
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:54 AM
Dec 2012
 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
167. In which direction? In the last 30 years concealed carry went from an obscurity in a couple states
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:02 AM
Dec 2012

to being the rule of law in 49 states.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
168. I disagree with almost everything Costas said
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:29 AM
Dec 2012

But he had every right in the world to say it. If you have a problem with sportscasters pontificating about non sports related topics your mute button can be your best friend.

You need to do a better job of choosing your battles. Don't try to defend the 2nd amendment by attacking the 1st.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
170. I'm not saying that it should be illegal for him to say anything, just that it was ill advised and
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:33 AM
Dec 2012

that it wasn't the right place. Sports are an escape from politics and all of the other stuff in life. Don't bring politics into sports, is my main idea.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
185. Yes... BY All Means, Let's Not Let Reality
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:41 AM
Dec 2012

like a football player becoming unhinged, killing his girlfriend, then himself (right in front of his coach).. let's not interject THAT-- into the football game and interfere with our need to distance ourselves from reality.

Moving on....

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
182. He should have mentioned all of that. But now to the industry he makes his living yakking about,
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:48 AM
Dec 2012

I'm sure he has been well schooled on not doing that on the air. If he had, it would have been his last network gig. It's like the veil of illusion between an actor and the audience. He's part of the magic show, and must not destroy the illusion.

The underbelly of sports scandals, the way tthe industry of the privately owned sporing franchises use public money for bringing along athletes to get into the professionals; the milking of property tax levees for decades and sales taxes for a private venue for private profit that the majority of people cannot afford, yet pay taxes on; the drugs and injuries and the reason players unionized and demand high salaries, as they are unable to do their work as long as other workers, and few survive in any condition to enjoy retirement.

It's out of balance, but that misery is supposed to be taken care of the unions and communities, but the game remains the same.

As far as crime, mental illness and poverty/inequality and the war of drugs, those are factors in violence of all kinds. Not just the 'sexy' crime with the gun or knife or fist; but the crime of lack of sane social policy and human rights. That is beyond Costa's pay grade and can't be brought up to people a half-time. Since they are there to have an 'experience,' not learn anything but some stats of how the teams that the public doesn't profit from watching, but diverts their minds from all those dreadful life lessons.

I don't think he's a moron. He's simply a symptom of the insanity of America, that millions or billions are being spent for this diversion, when the country's infrastructure is crumbling, schools are being lost, the environment destroyed and everyone's cheering and yelling for a ball they also don't own tossed by people they don't know, in a stadium they pay for and it goes on and one. There's a bit of the Roman sports arena in all of this, and it's all overhyped.

He didn't. by the criteria you are using here, dishonor the sporting industry, for the reasons you and I have just given here. He did bring up what has been on people's minds because of daily events and the media inducing fear.

This is not the beginning of confiscating the guns. That would be the only reason I'd see worth getting upset over.


 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
183. Agreed. Another breath of fresh air from the freshness factory. Always a pleasure, FW. : ) nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:02 AM
Dec 2012

Judi Lynn

(164,122 posts)
186. So glad to have seen your post. Thank you. n/t
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:55 AM
Dec 2012

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
193. What media inducing fear? nt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:43 PM
Dec 2012

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
194. Oh, here's one of them:
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:42 PM
Dec 2012


All of the we're-all-gonna-die! sort whose policy is to keep their viewers in a constant state of vigilance in order to make them less able to reflect and more open to right wing brainwashing.

You know, those guys. And most of the networks are just Faux-lite.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
187. Can't disagree with those 4 things...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:18 AM
Dec 2012

The 4 things listed, I agree.

However, the fact that guns kill more people in one year than Americans that were killed in Viet Nam and that the NRA has bought our legislators is the true crime.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
190. A most standard response
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:05 AM
Dec 2012

"... is a moron."

A most standard response when faced with ideas which may impugn our sacred cows. Zesty.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
191. The gun lobby has been hijacking America for its own political ends for too long.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:12 AM
Dec 2012

Sorry your culture is showing.




Raffi Ella

(4,465 posts)
192. cheap shot? ha, right.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:55 AM
Dec 2012

Remember something for me will ya', rDigital?

The electorate has changed; After Obama there will be Hillary; the Gun control discussion? it's gonna happen.

 

Pacafishmate

(249 posts)
197. Discuss all you like, the issue has already been decided.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:22 PM
Dec 2012

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
195. Do you still believe that gun control supporters are holocaust enablers?
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:43 PM
Dec 2012

Jury: poster has specifically stated this and has had a post hidden claiming just that. See here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=269047&sub=trans

This is not a "call out" or some kind of personal attack: it is a legitimate question based on the poster's own past replies.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
199. .
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 04:03 AM
Dec 2012

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
205. "holocaust enablers"
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:23 PM
Dec 2012
fIll iN tHe bLank really is fucked in the head. His thread was total flame bait. I see that he has lots of deleted posts.

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
216. Yep - and that isn't even the HALF of it. n/t.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:23 PM
Dec 2012

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
196. ...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:51 PM
Dec 2012

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
198. ...
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:41 AM
Dec 2012

liberal N proud

(61,194 posts)
201. Last I checked, this country still has freedom of speech
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:41 PM
Dec 2012

He had the microphone and took the opportunity to provide "HIS" opinion.

You may disagree with him and that is OK too, but because he used the tools he had to say what he wanted doesn't make him a moron.

It was a pertinent topic given the shadow the events of the previous day over the whole game.

Sports is what Costas does and his world was stunned, so he spoke out.

Can't blame him for that! All you can do is disagree with what he said.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
203. Agreed, and I am simply doing the same as he. He's a public figure, harsh criticism is expected. nt
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:54 PM
Dec 2012

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
206. You're not a public figure. You're a gungeoneer with a significant number of hidden posts
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:25 PM
Dec 2012

Having a good old time agitating on a Democratic message board

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
208. Thread disruption is not appreciated. If you have a problem.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:32 PM
Dec 2012

Take it to meta.

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
209. Go outside and play basketball or something
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:34 PM
Dec 2012

You need to clear your head.
How about a tourney that lasts a year or two?

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
210. Sure.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:46 PM
Dec 2012

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
215. +1,000. n/t.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:22 PM
Dec 2012

liberal N proud

(61,194 posts)
211. What you are doing is hanging a tag on him because you don't like what he said
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:47 PM
Dec 2012

Calling someone a moron might as well call them something else no difference.

Your OP would have been far better received had you simply said you disagreed with what he said and made your case. You chose to go the name calling route which goes nowhere.

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,493 posts)
213. Exactly.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:02 PM
Dec 2012

I don't like most of what George Will has to say (except perhaps about baseball.) But I know he's no moron.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
214. I can appreciate your perspective. nt
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:03 PM
Dec 2012

ellisonz

(27,776 posts)
219. It's been 12 days and I still think this post is moronic. n/t
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:38 PM
Dec 2012
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...